Citizenship Does not Automatically Equate to Loyalty

If we look across the West, we can see that Islam is dividing the West from within. Muslims are doing this with the support of far-leftist non-Muslims, who are either uniformed on Islam, want to stay purposely blind to the threat, or just hate Western Civilization so much that they will side with just about any ideology that opposes our way of life. The slaves to Allah are not the first to attempt an internal destruction of America. Back in the 30’s the Nazis who were obviously a huge external threat, also tried to divide America as well. In 1933 Nazi Deputy Führer Rudolf Hess, ordered German citizen Heinz Spanknobel who was living in America, to form an American Nazi organization. Eventually the group was merged into the German American Bund.

In 1936, the Friends regrouped as the German American Bund, an organization espousing to be “100% American.” They professed to be for “constitution, flag and a white gentile ruled, truly free America.” The Bund had two goals: to establish an effective power base by “Nazifying” the German American community and to sway American public opinion in favor of the New Germany.


Does the propaganda sound familiar? This is just what Muslims in America are doing today! The reason Muslims are being more successful is because their enemy ideology is in the guise of a religion.

The Nazi organization elected Fritz Julius Kuhn, a naturalized citizen of the United States to be their leader. When it came to being a Nazi, US citizenship did not equate to loyalty to America.

These days one of the statements non-Muslims protectors of Islam use to try to silence the critics of Islam, is that “they are US citizens”. As you can see with Nazism, citizenship does not always equate to loyalty. In regards to Muslims it does not necessarily mean they will stand with America over Islam. A recent Hizb ut-Tahrir America conference in Illionis is a perfect example of this.

(US Muslim leader calls for Sharia to the chants of Allah Akbar)

To further my point we will take a look at a new report by Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

Report: More than half of people arrested for Islamic terrorist activities were American citizens

Sixty percent of people arrested for Islamic terrorist activities between January 2009 and April 2011 were American citizens, according to a new report from Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. The study of 104 people who were arrested included U.S. and non-U.S. citizens living in America or abroad.

The report, “Analyzing the Islamic Extremist Phenomenon in the United States: A Study of Recent Activity,” was authored by Joan Neuhaus Schaan, fellow in homeland security at the Baker Institute. Jessica Phillips, an intern with the Baker Institute’s homeland security and terrorism program, provided research support for the study.

Using data from international and U.S. news reports, general Internet media, public records and official court documents, the researchers set out in November 2010 to analyze information on the status of Islamic extremism in the United States. They also looked at some of the unanswered questions raised by U.S. Rep. Peter King’s Committee on Homeland Security hearing, “The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and That Community’s Response.” King, R-N.Y., and chair of the committee, held the hearing March 10, 2011.

“Providing policymakers this data can allow for a factual discussion and diminish rhetoric,” Neuhaus Schaan said. “Consequently, policy can be crafted to address current and future needs in the face of change and adaptation by those determined to bring harm to the United States.”

Other key findings from the report include:

Of the 104 people arrested for Islamic extremist activities between January 2009 and April 2011, half were born in the U.S., 22 percent were naturalized citizens and 7 percent were dual citizens.

Of the 104, 5 percent entered the U.S. on a visa.

Sixty-three percent of converts had a known prior criminal record.

Of the 14 American converts with a prior criminal history, at least 55 percent had converted to Islam in prison.

Ninety-two 92 percent were male.

Sixty-four percent were 30 years old or younger.

Sixty-six percent had traveled or were in the process of traveling to the Middle East, Somalia, South Asia or the Balkans.

Of the 104, 70 percent had an association or were attempting an association with an internationally recognized terrorist organization; al-Qaida and its associated branches were cited most.

Of the 29 persons with no known association to a group, 11 had been active on terrorist-related chat rooms and websites.

Overall, 38 percent had been involved in this Internet activity.

Only 10 of the 104 are what the authors would consider “lone wolves”; most in the cohort had ties to others in the group or to an organization.

Information on birthplaces and conversion to Islam was available for 77 of the 104 people arrested. The data revealed that 60 percent of the group was born outside the U.S. Of the 31 U.S.-born persons where religion of origin could be determined , 14 were born into Muslim families and 17 converted to Islam.

“The Internet and prison conversion are the two biggest new trends that policymakers need to look at more closely,” Neuhaus Schaan said. “We’ve seen a major change in how people become associated with extremist groups in the past 20 years, and we need to adapt.”

The report concludes that approximately two-thirds of those involved in extremist activity are men under the age of 34, and no single, all-encompassing profile can be made of the analysis group of 104. Neuhaus Schaan said that the Baker Institute will continue to compile data and issue an updated report annually.

The full report can be viewed HERE.

When it comes to members of enemy ideologies, US citizenship does not necessarily mean loyalty… Isn’t it time we end all Muslim immigration?

[colorvote id=”1″ style=”wpcvp-poll”]

6 comments for “Citizenship Does not Automatically Equate to Loyalty

Comments are closed.