Google Disables ads on Logan’s Warning!

Today Google Adsense has taken a stand for Islam. Taken a stand for a so called religion that is out to enslave or kill the future generations, of the non-Muslims who have made this decision. Brilliant…..absolutely brilliant…..


Message flagged Monday, August 22, 2011 10:31 AM Message body
This message was sent from a notification-only email address that does not
accept incoming email. Please do not reply to this message.


During a recent review of your account we found that you are currently displaying Google ads in a manner that is not compliant with our program policies


Please note that this URL is an example and that the same violations may exist on other pages of this website or other sites in your network.


HATE/ANTI: Publishers are not permitted to place Google ads on sites with content advocating against any individual, group, or organization.More information about this policy can be found in our help center (

ACTION TAKEN: We have disabled ad serving to your site.

If the Interent was around during WWII, would Google have disabled ads on websites that warned people of the dangers of Nazism? I wouldn’t be surprised.



101 comments for “Google Disables ads on Logan’s Warning!

  1. maggy
    August 22, 2011 at 8:31 pm

    and what about the islamic sites inciting hate against non-muslims???…they are widely accessible on google….what the hell this double face.

    • August 23, 2011 at 9:07 am

      With a new ISLAMIC missile launch facility on the west coast of North America, Google should be more sensitive to the sentiments of those understanding the mortal danger we infidels face.
      Check out the website: asking donations for the the moon mission to be launched next year from British Columbia to put the first Moslem on the Moon. There he (NO DOUBT “HE”) will be the official observer of moon phases to time the start and finish of Ramadan. Oh joy.

    • Former NJ State Senator, Alene S. Ammond
      August 30, 2011 at 5:01 pm

      Dear Google, I am a Former Democrat NJ
      State Senator. I am also an expert re:
      military issues/i.e. bombings of Khobar
      Towers in Saudi Arabia killing 19 US
      pilots, wounding more than 500.

      I am shocked that you would block any
      sites with information about the dangers of
      Islamic Sharia laws and how they use
      them to dominate their women. Coming
      soon to America. It is surprising that
      you fail to recognize the dangers. Perhaps
      we need to boycott your sites. Either yo7u
      are very naive or profit dominates your
      philosophy. Alene S. Ammond, Former NJ
      State Senator 856/429-0844.

      • admin
        August 30, 2011 at 6:29 pm

        Hello Alene!

        I appreciate your support, and applaud your courage to post that. Thank you!

      • Dean
        September 2, 2011 at 1:59 pm


        Not only do you post here under different names, but now you are even impersonating a former US senator. I hope she finds this (on Google) and sues you. Clearly a copy and paste from the spacing after NJ. Her “expertise” is based on knowing of a bombing? Lol. If this really was a posting of a senator they would have more brains than to think your site was blocked by Google. They simply refused to carry your ad, more lol. And “she” is suggesting we boycott Google as some sort of threat? You would be that clueless. Not her.

        The naivety is “you7urs” haha. A senator addresses a letter to Google by posting it on your website? Too funny. This is a new low even for you islamophobic Logans Run!!!

  2. Christopher George
    August 22, 2011 at 8:53 pm

    What about all the anti-christianity stuff? Google allows that!

  3. August 22, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    They have been doing things like that for a while but I found the revenue from Adsense to be so insignificant that I simply don’t use it.

    Facebook is a worse source of corruption and censorship see

    Another site you might like is

    Bro. Winter

    • winterhypocrite
      August 23, 2011 at 10:58 am

      Interesting you cry out against censorship when you are extremely guilty of engaging in censorship yourself, sir. That, by definition, makes you a hypocrite.

      • eib
        August 24, 2011 at 6:53 am

        I’d suggest you look at Sheik Yer Mami’s webisite, and in particular, his ideas about comment-posting. It’s a huge box of text just below his stories.
        Perhaps you should also look at the comment-posting policy at Gates of Vienna.
        These are not public utilities, they are privately run blogs.
        All that is public about them is their venue.
        As far as I’m concerned, a blog-owner has every right to choose which comments or which input goes or stays at his site.
        If this individual takes comments and, by cutting text, changes their messages or implants, by way of connotations, messages in them that the writer never intended, then he would indeed be engaging in censorship.
        Wherever there is censorship, there is manipulation of the message.
        If comments are simply cut, then the commenter has been silenced, and sometimes, that’s what’s necessary if the blog is going in a specific direction on a topic.

        • winterhypocrite
          August 24, 2011 at 7:26 am

          I concur that a blog owner has every right to delete anything they wish to.


          When a blog owner such as Steve Winter complains about being censored (most of the time Mr. Winter isn’t being censored but suffering the consequences of violating terms of service) when at the same time Mr. Winter censors most all who comment on his websites, blogs, discussion forums, et al (he has several) then he becomes a major hypocrite by definition and his complaints ring hollow.

        • August 24, 2011 at 11:01 pm

          I don’t censor on my blog. The clown that calls himself a Baron at GoV is a bit of a goose.

      • eib
        August 24, 2011 at 6:54 am

        If you find that you have been silenced much— START YOUR OWN BLOG AND STOP BITCHING!!!

  4. August 22, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    Google isn’t the only way to advertise on a website 🙂

    I was checking a few of these out myself…

    * adbrite

    * Clicksor

    * Burst Media

    Just a few ideas. The heck with Google.

    • admin
      August 22, 2011 at 9:56 pm

      Hey Nachum!

      Thanks for posting that information.

  5. admin
    August 22, 2011 at 8:58 pm

    Like many other non-Muslim run companies, they are afraid to “offend” Muslims. They are afraid to face the harsh reality as to what Islam is.

    • Joe
      August 22, 2011 at 11:06 pm

      afraid to “offend” Muslims? They are either supporting the Muslim agenda or they are in denial and cannot see the threat the Islamic movement of America is going to be to them. I think they are in denial.

    • The Munz
      August 23, 2011 at 8:18 pm

      I am liking Goggle less and less now a days.

  6. Denny
    August 22, 2011 at 9:07 pm

    Yes, what about all the anti-Christianity material, and Muslim sites against the “infidels”!!!!! Is this what it is all about, a one way street for muslims?

    • admin
      August 22, 2011 at 9:22 pm

      Islam is a one-way street, and the West is playing right into its hand.

    • winterhypocrite
      August 24, 2011 at 7:28 am

      For whatever it is worth there is an excellent site that addresses and refutes the attacks from anti-Christian Islamic sites. It’s called Answering Islam and it’s URL is

      • eib
        August 24, 2011 at 8:53 am

        I think Answering Islam is an excellent site too. Whenever you are looking for Christian apologetics, you’re on a good track for refutations of Muslim doctrines about Christianity or the “other”.
        I wonder if Jewish religious authorities have been able to create good refutations of Muslim doctrines and Islam.

  7. Anna
    August 22, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    Bing will now be the only search engine that I will use!

    • larry
      August 24, 2011 at 6:12 am

      Who needs Google? Bing is much the better way!

  8. August 22, 2011 at 9:25 pm


    The next step is to find all Google ads on Musloid web sites including those that promote hatred of Jews, Christians, Israel, and so on. We must report them and make it a matter of record. If Google then does not drop its ads from the Musloid sites, we can publicly accuse it of having a double standard or whatever.

    • admin
      August 22, 2011 at 9:56 pm

      I have it saved, good idea!

  9. August 22, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    My site will soon be having the same fate then. I am so disappointed with Google.

  10. Fergie
    August 23, 2011 at 12:44 am

    I think some legal beagles would like to hear about this. Submit a copy of the email along with a list of sites from the Haji sites which display anti west, anti jewish stuff and sue their asses. Perhaps even the human rights folks might even get involved if a double standard can be proven.

  11. dumb crackers
    August 23, 2011 at 1:15 am

    ahaha you ignorant crackers got what you deserved. nobody wants any part of your bullshit. Git r done! ahaha faggot honkys

    • admin
      August 23, 2011 at 1:22 am

      Since you seem so intelligent, why don’t you come back here and debate me on Islam? Then explain why the campaign against Islam is growing.

      BTW racist, not everyone here is white.

      • dar alharb
        August 23, 2011 at 2:10 am

        “dumbcrackers” should read some of what mo had to say about what he called the ‘children of ham’.

      • MN
        August 23, 2011 at 1:31 pm

        Me brown.. India.. Hindu.. And I support Chris & LW.

      • Dean
        August 24, 2011 at 11:59 am

        I debated you. Instead of refuting the facts I posted you deleted them and abused me for causing trouble lol. Google is just giving you some of your same medicine so accept it and stop whining.

        • admin
          August 24, 2011 at 4:02 pm

          Dear OBSESSED FREAK, I did not delete your comments here. All you did was run from facts. RW promotes Islam, he does not have the guts to condemn Islam, and you do not have the guts to face this fact. I am not whining, but you have been since you have been here. LOL!

          • eib
            August 25, 2011 at 3:42 am

            According to Sharia law, what you are writing at this site and allowing us to write merits the penalty of death.
            You are a brave, brave man.

          • admin
            August 25, 2011 at 9:54 am

            Thanks eib, keep on speaking out!

        • eib
          August 25, 2011 at 3:41 am

          If you believe that what Google is doing is lawful, they you are not a Christian.
          You are a Muslim.
          You advocate the institution and enforcement of Sharia law.
          You need only say the Shahada and be done with it; you have submitted.
          And you’ll submit again and again. And here on earth, you’ll gain by it.
          Only after you die will your errancy become painfully apparent.

          • admin
            August 25, 2011 at 9:56 am

            Dean was only here to start arguments. He even followed me over to FaceBook to try and have the same conversation. He is gone now.

          • admin
            August 25, 2011 at 6:10 pm

            Oh look, OBSESSED FREAK is back under another name. (AXIOM) LOL!

            You dropping the “Islamophobia” term says a lot. In case you did not notice you get no respect here.

    • eib
      August 24, 2011 at 6:58 am

      Your African brothers and sisters are being enslaved by Muslims every day in the Trans-Saharan slave trade, and you do nothing, say nothing!
      620,000 Americans died to free 4 million black slaves.
      Not one Muslim has ever died to free even one slave.
      You’d better think carefully about who your friends really are. Better the white devil you know than the other you don’t.

      • August 24, 2011 at 8:01 am


      • August 24, 2011 at 11:04 pm

        Maybe he’s a member of the Nation of pislam?

        • eib
          August 25, 2011 at 3:38 am

          If he is, then he isn’t safe from the destructive tendencies of Orthodox Muslims.
          Most of them view the NI as heretical, and they will want to destroy it when they cease to have a use for it.

          • August 25, 2011 at 6:53 am

            Ironic isn’t it? If Sharia is ever implemented in the U.S. liberals and The Nation of islam will be the first who literaly have their heads handed to them, yet they are the one’s who defend islam. I guess there is something to the old saying “ignorance is bliss.”

  12. Robin Shadowes
    August 23, 2011 at 1:56 am

    I can’t say I will miss those arselifter dating ads one bit. They were quite annoying in fact.

  13. Diane Pascaretti
    August 23, 2011 at 5:14 am

    Why the surprise at this decision with Google they are the same org that helps the communist Chineese spy on their citizens. The same that helps big brother spy on us as well. They have small cars with antena radar on the roof and are driving through neighborhoods here in my area taking pictures. Creepy UnAmerican traitors. Get them off your computer. Don’t help them spy on us. As always thanks Chris for your info.

  14. mike v
    August 23, 2011 at 5:17 am

    shame on google and american people for tolerating this crapola

  15. arthur
    August 23, 2011 at 8:04 am

    This leaves it open to ban the koran which preaches hate and murder!!

  16. Chris
    August 23, 2011 at 8:23 am

    The only thing worse than being blind to the evils of the Islamic ideology is preventing others from speaking the truth. The prophet Ezekiel (called Dhul-Kifl in the Quran) made that point 2600 years ago: “If the watchman sees the enemy coming and does not sound the alarm, the enemy will come and kill those [unfortunate countrymen], but [God] will hold the watchman responsible for their death. (Ezekiel 33:6) One day Google will regret their complicity in the cover-up.

    • August 23, 2011 at 8:36 am

      Thank you Chris, well said!

    • eib
      August 23, 2011 at 1:06 pm

      It is the nature of evil to demand compliance and even active participation.
      The devil must make all his minions.

    August 23, 2011 at 9:24 am


    • admin
      August 23, 2011 at 9:38 am

      The anti-Islam backlash is coming. All within the law, of course.

      • August 27, 2011 at 8:32 pm

        I’m seeing a lot of reports lately about pislamophobia and who’s behind it on the libtard and dhimmi sites like HuffPo, Open Democracy and Al-jizya. Seems they are running scared and looking for someone to blame.

  18. August 23, 2011 at 9:27 am

    You may also choose to use . It is a search engine that is enhanced by google, but you can not be traced. All subjects searched are only seen by google as being from starting page.

    • August 27, 2011 at 8:35 pm

      At first I thought it was just a proxy service into Google’s search engine but it appears they they modify the returned search results too so that you can use their proxy service to visit the found pages too. That’s pretty neat. I think I might bookmark them for future use.

  19. grego
    August 23, 2011 at 10:02 am

    What you people don’t seem to realize is that there are many muslims EMPLOYED by google. Enough of one kind of worker in any company and they can force the company to change policies. When I was in college, I noticed a lot of muslim men taking computer courses or computer majors. Well, guess who is heading up computer departments at various organizations now?

    • Charlie
      August 23, 2011 at 10:54 am

      As sneaky and devious as the God they worship – SATAN himself.

    • August 27, 2011 at 8:36 pm

      That could be the case but Google seems to prefer people with PhDs in the key positions. You won’t find many arselifters with PhDs.

  20. Schmitty
    August 23, 2011 at 11:51 am

    It’s what happens when Google decided to jump into bed with Obama.

  21. Mark Preston
    August 23, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    I was “kicked off” Google’s ‘Groups’ for a post at a food group that discussed BBQ of all things. I posted a few words from P. Morton Shand’s thoughts on vegetarianism. The ‘peta like crowd’ somehow found a way to talk to Google. To this day I haven’t been able to figure how they did that, but, the extremists are out there.

    • August 24, 2011 at 11:11 pm

      Its easy to complain about posts on Google Groups. However, the poster has to have a GG account for them to do anything. They can’t censor someone who uses a regular newsserver and newsreader. I’d recommend one of the independent NSPs like Astraweb (fast but not the best. They limit you to 3 crossposted groups. If you go above that they silently delete your post. GG allows 5, by way of comparison). That way you can take your account with you if you swap ISPs. Do many ISPs in the US still offer newsgroup access? I know its getting worse. Comcast users seem to complain about it. Do RoadRunner still have it?

  22. eib
    August 23, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    you are currently displaying Google ads in a manner that is not compliant with our program policies

    You mean, not compliant with Sharia law.
    We will not obey the law if it is unjust.
    And to favor Islam is unjust.
    And evil in the eyes of the other great religions of the world.
    You know, the OTHER great religions of the world!

  23. kope
    August 23, 2011 at 4:12 pm


    bin laden win again

    • August 23, 2011 at 4:28 pm

      bin laden will never will, nor will islam

  24. Truth
    August 23, 2011 at 4:17 pm

    To hell with Google.

  25. dummies
    August 23, 2011 at 9:09 pm

    this website is so irrelevant, even Google wants nothing to do with it. go suck a dick NIGGAS!

    • admin
      August 23, 2011 at 9:22 pm

      Yet, you have posted here under the following names. Dumb crackers, derp, fags, drew, rapper?, john, dumb asses, and truth. LOL!

    • Robin Shadowes
      August 24, 2011 at 3:09 am

      The new word is nogger. LOL!

      • August 24, 2011 at 11:15 pm

        Yep! 😉 I wonder if he’s from Noggerdishu?

    • eib
      August 25, 2011 at 3:36 am

      Irrelevant — to whom?

  26. urban dictionary
    August 24, 2011 at 7:17 pm

    according to urban dictionary, this entire site is an embarrassment by christian wackos

    • August 24, 2011 at 7:52 pm

      Fortunatly we don’t care what urban dictionary thinks

    • eib
      August 25, 2011 at 3:35 am

      You don’t seem to understand that the man who runs this site is an atheist.
      There are many cases against the validity of Islam in the West.
      There is the theological case mounted by Christians and the rational and historical case mounted by non-Christians and most particularly skeptics.
      As a skeptic, the owner of this site has much more to lose under Muslim domination or even in the shadow of Muslim ascendancy than even the Christians do.
      Still, Christians are second-class citizens in Islam– subject to theft, murder, the pillage and desecration of churches, and rape.
      The more you know about Islam, the more repulsive it is as a culture.

    • admin
      August 25, 2011 at 9:51 am

      I. I don’t care what that dictionary says.
      2. I am not religious.
      3. Do you want your future generations to be forced to live under Sharia Law?

  27. August 24, 2011 at 10:57 pm

    Stay as watchman on the wall.
    However if possible is, to sue Google for double standard and conflict of interest,
    via Human Rights which includes, race,creed,
    ect.One creed cannot call for death to the infidels, while the targeted creed tries to defend itself and is warning others about it.
    As for urban dictionary, one does not have to be a christian to see the injustice of it all, unless the urban dictionary is the wacko. Reverend Dan has it right.

  28. Darrius Jeddburgh
    August 25, 2011 at 4:43 am

    fucking retards, fuck’em!

  29. August 25, 2011 at 10:55 am

    as for darrius jeddburgh who suffers from mouth diarrhea, there a remedies for this malady

  30. admin
    August 25, 2011 at 6:16 pm

    I am not “eib”, so stop making things up. You need to lose the obsession with me. It is pathetic. The facts were examined, you are a childish distraction to a serious problem.

  31. August 25, 2011 at 10:10 pm

    Dean, you write of Chris not answering you, what about you not answering me from the very first time you wrote on this site? I asked you how you or Rick Warren could answer the following when it comes to your or his “interfaith projects”
    2 John 1:7-11
    New International Version 1984 (NIV1984)

    7 Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist. 8 Watch out that you do not lose what you have worked for, but that you may be rewarded fully. 9 Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take him into your house or welcome him. 11 Anyone who welcomes him shares in his wicked work.

    All of it, but esp. verses 10 and 11 shows exactly what is wrong with Warren speaking at the ISNA Conference. Is he such a hero to you that you can’t see that with the Scripture in front of you?

    The ISNA is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sunni Muslims. In their charter, the stated goal is the destruction of Israel and the destruction from within of the USA. In 2010 according to the US State Department there were 11,604 Terror attacks in the world 60% of them were committed by Sunni Muslims; 13,186 people killed, 70% of those killed were by Sunni Muslims.

    Now you tell me after reading the Scripture, after seeing the FACTS, you think Warren should be addressing the ISNA?

    • admin
      August 26, 2011 at 12:24 am

      Dan, I did answer him over and over. He is here to play games. Warren supports Islam by showing up at these conferences, quoting the Koran, invoking the name of “Isa”, and NOT saying a word about Islam being a threat to Christianity. The man is a disgrace to Christianity. “Dean” brought up the Crusades, said there is no slave trade after eib brought up, dropped the “Islamophobia” term. His goal here is clear. The funny part is he thinks he is so important. He is too dumb to see I am not going to spend day after day on this with him. “Dean” I run from no one…..I am NYC…..

      Rick Warren bows to Islam.

      Quote of the Day: “Before we “shake your hand” in responding to your letter, we ask forgiveness of the All-Merciful One and of the Muslim community around the world.” – Rick Warren in a speech to Muslims.

      After 4 in the morning and OBSESSED FREAK is still trying to post here. LOL!

      • August 26, 2011 at 5:22 am

        It took me so long to type my reply his was already gone lol so you may want to delete my LONG post it doesn’t really make any sense without his! He tires me 😉

        • eib
          August 26, 2011 at 6:23 am

          The objective of tiring you out, of tiring us all out, serves the purposes of jihad perfectly.
          And they say Muslim apologists or dawah experts aren’t in the brainwashing business!
          The exhausted tend to submit, as Dean is well aware.

      • admin
        August 27, 2011 at 7:02 am

        I delete your posts because you are a disrespectful clown, and you are not driving me crazy. You are an obsessed freak, and a waste of time. How many hours do you stare at this site? LOL! We spoke, there is no point to continue the debate.

  32. admin
    August 26, 2011 at 12:30 am

    The prophet Ezekiel (called Dhul-Kifl in the Quran) made that point 2600 years ago: “If the watchman sees the enemy coming and does not sound the alarm, the enemy will come and kill those [unfortunate countrymen], but [God] will hold the watchman responsible for their death. (Ezekiel 33:6)

  33. August 26, 2011 at 5:19 am

    Dean, you must be on staff at Saddlebrook. You didn’t respond to my Fact, the FACT was the stats from the State Department, you responded to The Scripture. You were wrong but you did respond.

    1.) You wrote:

    In order to understand what is being said here we need to look at the context of these verses as well as the time in which it was written. The Christian faith was new and without Scriptures or a strong theological tradition there were dangers that the truth of the gospel would be corrupted early on by itinerant preachers who were teaching another gospel. So John is warning the church against people who want to come to the church and preach a gospel that denied that Jesus Christ (God) had come in the flesh.

    What relevance does this have today?
    You went to a Baptist College, I assume to the Seminary the way you write. You know The Holy Bible is the INERRANT Word of God. It is just as true, just as relevant today as when it was written. You should also know IF you have studied John wasn’t just talking about allowing them to Preach their false doctrine in a Church or in your home. In some of the translations it says not to even wish the anti-christ God speed. We are to share The Gospel with our Muslim Brothers and Sisters, we are not to do ANYTHING to give islam credability, or a platform.

    This is what the Wiersbe Bible Commentary says about that Scripture:

    John’s second epistle gives further warning about false teachers (2 John 7–11). A Christian who meddles with these deceivers is in danger of losing his full reward (2 John 8). You should not even say goodbye
    (which literally means “God be with you”). You are not to be rude or unkind, because that would not be Christian, but you are not to let them into your home to explain their views. Why? Because if you let them in,
    two consequences may follow: First, they will plant the seeds of false teaching in your mind, and Satan can water and nourish these seeds to produce bitter fruit.
    But even if this does not happen, by entertaining false teachers in your home you are giving them entrance into other homes! The deceiver will say to your neighbor
    down the street, “Mr. and Mrs. Smith let me into their home, and you know what good Christians they are!”

    Wiersbe talks of exactly what I told you earlier about the appearance of having a Preacher of Warrens prominence addressing the Imams and how they would use it.

    Furthermore, go into 1 John 2:18-27 to see more of John’s warnings.

    Then you write:

    Ahhh I hear you say, its OK to speak out faith publicly but not to go into the worship service of a religion that teaches a different gospel. Really? The reader of this post might be interested to learn that after the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, those early church leaders spoke regularly in the synagogues – the place of Jewish worship – the same Jews who handed over Jesus to be crucified! We see a number of instances of this in the Bible, Acts 9:20 and Acts 17:17 being just two examples. When they spoke there they stated unequivocably for Christ, stating they believed him to be the only way to the father, just as Rick Warren does.


    Warren didn’t do as Jesus did,he addressed a group of Sunni Muslim leaders who are a sister organization of The Muslim Brotherhood who’s number one goal is the destruction of Israel and the destruction of The US from within at a convention. Not quite the same as Jesus going into a Temple or Synagogues and sharing The Gospel with the Jews.

    Next you write:

    Finally we need to ask, which is more Christian: to love our enemies and work with them to overcome injustice? Or to spread falsehood about them and stir up hate?


    I resent that. You show me one single instance of me spreading falsehood about islam. One. You can’t. You are so niave about islam.

    • eib
      August 26, 2011 at 6:24 am

      To assert that Islam is intolerant is not to spread hate.
      It is to accept the truth.

    • eib
      August 26, 2011 at 6:31 am

      Ahhh I hear you say, its OK to speak out faith publicly but not to go into the worship service of a religion that teaches a different gospel.

      For the Christian, there are no different gospels.
      The only gospel, the only so named, is that of the Christians, that in the NT.
      There is no “different gospel”.
      The Quran is profane.
      It has no gospel, no testaments, no history, no context, no narrative order, nor does it have anything of God in it.

    • eib
      August 26, 2011 at 6:33 am

      The reader of this post might be interested to learn that after the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, those early church leaders spoke regularly in the synagogues – the place of Jewish worship – the same Jews who handed over Jesus to be crucified!

      The anti-Jewish thought behind this post indicates that the writer is a Muslim, or someone outside the two monotheisms.
      Islam is a form of Arabic paganism, worship of the elemental spirit Allah.
      “the same Jews”
      After Christ, the Jews were never the same.

      • eib
        August 26, 2011 at 6:36 am

        We are to share The Gospel with our Muslim Brothers and Sisters, we are not to do ANYTHING to give islam credability, or a platform.

        In democratic countries, this is lawful conduct.
        In the case of Muslims, this is all you can do.
        In Sharia-controlled countries, even sharing Christian scripture, doctrine and practice is ILLEGAL and punishable by death.
        Islam is profane.
        Islam is intolerant.
        Muslims are the bane of the world and residing in the outer darkness.
        They are not, and never have been, monotheists.

  34. eib
    August 26, 2011 at 6:38 am

    The Christian faith was new and without Scriptures or a strong theological tradition there were dangers that the truth of the gospel would be corrupted early on by itinerant preachers who were teaching another gospel. So John is warning the church against people who want to come to the church and preach a gospel that denied that Jesus Christ (God) had come in the flesh.

    What relevance does this have today?

    The way I see it, nothing has changed.

    • August 26, 2011 at 8:24 am

      Quote – What relevance does this have today?

      The way I see it, nothing has changed.


      • admin
        August 27, 2011 at 7:46 am

        “As-salamu Alaykum. I come to you today deeply humbled and honored by this invitation. I truly mean that. I applaud your courage for inviting an Evangelical pastor. Thank you.” This was the opening statement of Rick Warren, the leading pastor of the influential Southern California Saddleback Church, as he stood in front of the attendees of ISNA’s 46th Annual Convention in July 2009.
        He spoke these words as he stood at the podium emblazoned with ISNA’s logo, an image that, for many, is a symbol of terror and stealth jihad.
        ISNA is an American arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. It was founded in 1981 by a group of individuals which included the North American leader of Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) Sami al-Arian.
        In 2007 and 2008, ISNA was named by the United States Justice Department as a willing participant in the financing of millions of dollars to Hamas.

        Like I said, Warren is a disgrace.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *