Sharia Law (Islamic Law) 101: Non-Muslims Under Sharia

Whether Muslims takeover through violence or by using our freedoms against us to advance Islam, the final goal is the same. That is an America governed by Sharia Law. While the laws of America are equal for all, Sharia Law discriminates against non-Muslims, apostates, homosexuals, and women. I believe if more Americans knew what Sharia Law demands they would take a stand against it. This will be my first installment on Sharia, and I just want it known that the laws I write about were taken from, the Reliance of the “Traveller, A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”. The book has the stamp of approval of Al Azhar, the world’s highest learning Islamic school. This first installment shows us how non-Muslims, are treated as second-class citizens under Islamic rule. I will not add any commentary to the laws, this way people can print it out if they like. They are pretty self explanatory, though if anyone has any questions please ask them in the comment section below.Thank you.

JUSTICE CHAPTER: NON-MUSLIM SUBJECTS OF THE ISLAMIC STATE (AHL AL-DHIMMA)

o11.1 A formal agreement of protection is made with citizens who are:

(1) Jews;

(2) Christians;

(3) Zoroastrians;

(4) Samarians and Sabians, if their religions do not respectively contradict the fundamental bases of Judaism and Christianity;

(5) and those who adhere to the religion of Abraham or one of the other prophets (upon whom be blessings and peace).

o11.2 Such an agreement may not be effected with those who are idol worshippers, or those who do not have a Sacred Book or something that could have been a book.
(A: Something that could have been a Book refers to those like the Zoroastrians, who have remnants resembling an ancient Book. As for the psuedoscriptures of cults that have appeared since Islam (n: such as the Sikh, Baha’is, Mormons, Qadianis, etc.) they are neither are nor could be a Book since the Koran is the final revelation.)

o11.3 Such an agreement is only valid when the subject peoples:

(a) follow the rules of Islam (o11.5) (A: those mentioned below (o11.5) and those involving public behavior and dress, though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject communities have their own laws, judges, and courts, enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves);

(b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)

THE NON-MUSLIM POLL TAX

o11.4 The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is on dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per year) The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon.
It is collected with leniency and politeness, as are all debts, and it not levied on women, children, or the insane.

o11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

(1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness:

(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar)

(3) are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykun”;

(4) must keep to the side of the street;

(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

(7) and are forbidden to build new churches

o11.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days (when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).

o11.7 A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances, or enter any other mosque without persmission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches without their permission).

o11.8 It is obligatory for the caliph to protect those of them who are in Muslim lands just as he would Muslims, and to seek the release of those captured.

o11.9 If non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state refuse to conform to the rules of Islam or pay the non-Muslim poll tax, than their agreement with the state has been violated. (dis: o11.11) (A: though if only one of them disobeys, it concerns him alone).

o11.10 The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;

(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;

(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;

(4) kills a Muslim;

(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

o11.11 When a subject’s agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

PRISONERS OF WAR

o9.14 When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph considers the interests
(O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed , and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

Comments

comments

0 0 votes
Article Rating
127 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] outspoken against Islam. Over the years we particapted in numerous online debates in an attempt to expose the threat of Islam to non-Muslims. What I did not know about my friend until recently is that he is an ex-Muslim. An ex-Muslim […]

trackback

[…] of time until Muslims feel they have enough power and claim the West is their’s and under the jurisdiction of Islam. Then […]

trackback

[…] is being done by non-Muslims in this war is not even coming close to saving our future generations from Islamic rule. Muslims have successfully turned our freedoms into a tool of Islam, nation building didn’t […]

trackback

[…] I believe the US Embassy meant what they said, and wants to remain in that fantasy land. When I asked them if they have ever read a Koran, they pulled a Harry Houdini on me. We will never win the war, until we name the enemy. That enemy is Islam! […]

trackback

[…] I believe the US Embassy meant what they said, and wants to remain in that fantasy land. When I asked them if they have ever read a Koran, they pulled a Harry Houdini on me. We will never win the war, until we name the enemy. That enemy is Islam! […]

trackback

[…] is the resolve of the American infidels. A quickly growing group of Americans who are fully aware of what will happen to their future generations if Islam is not stopped. A group of true patriots who are willing to roll up their sleeves against your attempts of curbing […]

trackback

[…] did he intentionally lie like his hero Mohammad instructed Muslims to do? Even scholars at Egypt’s Al Azhar University admit that Islamic Law pertains to non-Muslims as… I challenge him to prove them […]

trackback

[…] it or not. If they get their way the freedoms of our generations will be swept away, as Islam calls for dominance over non-Muslims. The Islamic war on non-Muslims is not a new phenomenon though. It has been going on since the days […]

trackback

[…] he only sees what he wants to see, and quite frankly I do not think he has the courage to face the harsh realities of Islam itself. At the core of his argument is the view that “moderate Islam cannot exist.” To which I reply […]

trackback

[…] of those who are wronged! If you… http://fb.me/2qlpFOzq7  What he fails to mention is that Islam is what oppresses, and on top of that the “scholar” took the easy way out, by blocking me on […]

trackback

[…] aspects of Sharia that have crept into Western societies are just the beginning stages of a complete domination of non-Muslims under Islamic Law, if the so called religion is not […]

trackback

[…] outspoken against Islam. Over the years we particapted in numerous online debates in an attempt to expose the threat of Islam to non-Muslims. What I did not know about my friend until recently is that he is an ex-Muslim. An ex-Muslim living […]

trackback

[…] outspoken against Islam. Over the years we particapted in numerous online debates in an attempt to expose the threat of Islam to non-Muslims. What I did not know about my friend until recently is that he is an ex-Muslim. An ex-Muslim living […]

JS
JS
8 years ago

The above list of “conditions” are taken form the original agreement between the second caliph, Omar bin al-Khattab (r. 634 to 644), and a community of conqured christians in Syria, (thus the name “Conditions of Omar”, or “The Pact of Omar”) and forms the basis for what is known as “dhimmi” or “dhimmitude” today. Sharia law defines a dhimmi as any non-Muslim living under Islamic authority. The whole point is to promote the perception of “submission” or to “feel themselves subdued” by the Islamic authority over them.

Below are excerpts from Raymond Ibrahim’s article “Western Ignorance of the ‘Conditions of Omar’” March 24, 2014 in PJ Media website:

(It is written in first person, according to the original text)

Not to build a church in our city—nor a monastery, convent, or monk’s cell in the surrounding areas—and not to repair those that fall in ruins or are in Muslim quarters;

Not to clang our cymbals except lightly and from the innermost recesses of our churches;

Not to display a cross on them [churches], nor raise our voices during prayer or readings in our churches anywhere near Muslims;

Not to produce a cross or [Christian] book in the markets of the Muslims;

Not to congregate in the open for Easter or Palm Sunday, nor lift our voices [in lamentation] for our dead nor show our firelights with them near the market places of the Muslims;

Not to display any signs of polytheism, nor make our religion appealing, nor call or proselytize anyone to it;

Not to prevent any of our relatives who wish to enter into Islam;

Not to possess or bear any arms whatsoever, nor gird ourselves with swords;

To honor the Muslims, show them the way, and rise up from our seats if they wish to sit down;

We guarantee all this to you upon ourselves, our descendants, our spouses, and our neighbors, and if we change or contradict these conditions imposed upon ourselves in order to receive safety, we forfeit our dhimma [covenant], and we become liable to the same treatment you inflict upon the people who resist and cause sedition. (1)

Ref: (1) http://www.raymondibrahim.com/islam/western-ignorance-of-the-conditions-of-omar/

trackback

[…] a beautiful sunny day. Freedom was in the air! Then unfortunately I was hit with a reminder of what so many of us are fighting to keep these simple freedoms. Sahih Bukhari: The People of the Book. […]

trackback

[…] Now we will step through Obama’s smokescreen and further into the nightmare Islam is….  […]

trackback

[…] so can certainly bring some life-threatening results. It is just a price we must pay in order to save our future generations from death or enslavement under Islamic rule. While on Facebook yesterday I had posted the following […]

trackback

[…] funny, and it is obvious that the doctor is not happy with America or North American Infidels’ truths on Islam. But that is OK, his threat just adds fuel to the […]

trackback

[…] have an America first President in office via Donald Trump, it does not mean that we free from the threat of Islam. In fact far from it, and one of the main reasons for that is the MSM’s obsessive criticism of […]

trackback

[…] years I have been saying in order to win the war with Islam, we must accurately name the enemy ideology. Which is something most of the MSM is just not willing […]

trackback

[…] years I have been saying that we must accurately identify the enemy ideology, or is it just a matter of time until we lose the war. Naming the enemy is exactly what I did on […]