National Security Adviser H R McMaster ~ “Peaceful Islam” to Dominate the World

If you have been reading my Twitter and Facebook pages, you would know that I have been saying that when it comes to Islam Trump has been getting terrible advice. Advice that is Islam empowering.

One of his unfortunately trusted advisers is H. R, McMaster. A clear apologist for Islam.

Terrorists are “un-Islamic” and the label “radical Islamic terrorism” is not helpful when describing their activities, President Donald Trump’s new national security adviser said this week, showing a marked difference from the language the president and many of his senior advisers often use.

Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster made the comments during his first “all-hands” staff meeting on Thursday, reports The New York Times, quoting people who attended. They also reported the new adviser, who remains in the active military, wore his Army uniform during the talks.

Is that so McMaster? Do you claim to know more about Islam than Mohammad himself did?

Facts show us that Mohammad was a self-proclaimed terrorist.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

 

 

 

 

 

Facts show us that Mohammad was an absolute madman.

Muslim Book 016, Number 4131:

He [Muhammad] commanded about them, and (thus) their hands and feet were cut off and their eyes were gouged and then they were thrown in the sun, until they died.

Facts show us that Mohammad supported sex slavery, and those with morals know that is rape.

 

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Hadith Number 3371:

Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

Facts show us that Mohammad had no problem in killing in the name of Islam.

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24:

So I ask again. Does McMaster know more about Islam than Mohammad did?

Donald Trump to deliver ‘inspiring’ speech on ‘peaceful vision of Islam’ in Saudi Arabia
President will give ‘direct speech’ on how to combat extremism, says his national security adviser

Donald Trump will give a speech on combatting radical Islam to a group of Muslim leaders in Saudi Arabia during his first trip abroad as US President.

Mr Trump will speak to around 50 Muslim leaders and will take part in opening a centre there which is dedicated to promote moderate Islam, said national security adviser H R McMaster.

As usual I will give a point by point breakdown on the misleading information that this article supplies. Something the MSM does not have the courage to do.

1. Trump believing that Muslims care what he wants only shows us that he is uninformed on Islam.

2. I have been going out of my way to speak to Muslims for over a decade now. Yet in all of that time, not one of them has condemned even one verse in the Koran. Including extreme actions such as amputations and lashings. If he thinks the Saudis are going to he is extremely naive.

Koran 5:38:

Koran 24:2: 

Oh wait….the Saudis support both of those torturous actions.

United Nations torture experts called on Saudi Arabia on Friday to stop corporal punishment, including flogging and amputations, practices that the Gulf kingdom considers an integral part of its interpretation of Islamic law.

3. There is no radical Islam. There is only the Koran and it is the book of Islam. If we do not accurately name the enemy ideology we will not win this war.

4. “Moderate Islam”? Can McMaster show us just one translation of the Koran that does not call for dominance over non-Muslims? By force if need be. Because I have yet to find one. I have found these seven translations though.

At this point there are only two options here. Either McMaster is a shill for Islam, or he is ignorant on the issue. Either way he is complicit in the impending Islamic destruction of Western Civilization.

In closing I will give you this last piece of evidence…

The President will “will deliver an inspiring but direct speech on the need to confront radical ideology and the president’s hopes for a peaceful vision of Islam to dominate across the world,” Mr McMaster said.

Please wake up Mr. President, and handle your business!

The Hijab, Freedom or Defiance?

Over the past few years there have been numerous debates on the hijab. A head covering worn by Muslim women.

One of them has been whether wearing the hijab is an act of enslavement or freedom. The correct answer has two parts to it though. It is an act of enslavement and defiance.

As proven in the world renowned Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

Koran 33:59 

As you see the explanation of the verse states that Muslim women are to wear it in order to distinct themselves from the women of Jahiliyyah and slave women.

Jahiliyyah (Oxford Islamic Studies Online)

Pre-Islamic period, or “ignorance” of monotheism and divine law. In current use, refers to secular modernity, for example in the work of Abu al-Ala Mawdudi , who viewed modernity as the “new jahiliyyah.” Sayyid Qutb interpreted jahiliyyah as the domination of humans over humans, rather than submission of humans to God. The term denotes any government system, ideology, or institution based on values other than those referring to God. To correct this situation, such thinkers propose the implementation of Islamic law, values, and principles. Radical groups justify militant actions against secular regimes in terms of jihad against jahiliyyah.

Meaning they do not want to be like non-Muslim women, not even the ones who support them. Meaning wearing the hijab is not an act of assimilation, it is an act of defiance and disrespect. It is time to stop supporting what looks down on you ladies. Islam.

The Rebel TV & Ezra Levant Promote Muslim Propagandist Malala Yousafzai

Yes there is sympathy for her because the Taliban shot her in the face. In no way though is that an excuse for such faulty reporting. As Rebel TV and Ezra Levant have put her on a pedestal in their failed attempt at playing the “good” Muslim, bad Muslim “game”. A “game” the MSM media has been playing for years. A “game” that really should be referred to as Islamic Roulette.

Now I have no love for the Islam loving Trudeau. but that does not mean we should be promoting a Muslim propagandist like Malala. If the homework was done Rebel and Ezra would have known 5 major points about Malala.

1. That she promotes the notion that Islam is about equality. (At the 1:26 mark.) Which is easily proven false here.

Koran 9:29

2. That she states killing people is not Islam. Islam is peace. (At the 2:45 mark.) Well apparently she knows Islam better than Mohammad did.

3. That she believes lack of education is the problem for (Islamic) terrorism. (At the 3:45 mark.) Does that include Al Qaeda’s top two dogs, Osama Bin Laden, and Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri?

4. That, and most importantly, she is against the criticism of Islam. (At the 4:25 mark.)  Which might be why Ezra promotes her. Because if you read his article he does not criticize Islam either. He criticizes “radical Islam”. Are there two Korans?

How do I know these things about her? Because a couple of years ago I took the time to watch the following video which is just over 5 minutes in length.

Oh yea….#5…she is against Trump’s proposed travel ban.

“Well, when the president banned Muslim-majority countries, that was really disappointing. And I was deeply hurt because I’m a Muslim,” Yousafzai said. “And to me, it just seemed like directly blaming Muslims, and that is not a solution. That is just making an excuse and hiding from the real problems. I think he needs to understand that you need to meet the people. You need to see the refugee people.”

Right Malala, Muslims would never lie as instructed to.

Meaning she wants to follow the Koran’s call to flood the world with Muslim invaders.

Koran 4:100

Friend of the West? Not even lose. Irresponsible reporting? Most definitely.

The Clarion Project to Logan’s Warning: We do not Know how Islam Will Reform

We Have a Bridge to Sell you 

Recently I was involved in a three party email with the Clarion Project’s Jeremy Cardash and The Logic of Islam’s Dr. Carl Goldberg. Who defeated the Clarion’s Project’s Zuhdi Jasser in a public debate.

Unfortunately Jasser is not the only face Clarion promotes as they mislead the country on the hope of a reformation of Islam. Another is so called moderate Muslim Raheel Raza.

Originally the content of the email was Dr. Carl questioning Clarion on reform. So I decided to chime in with few simple questions.

Unlike the MSM we are not afraid to ask the Tough Questions on This Issue

Clarion Strikes Out

Strike one!: First off it is flat out insulting that Jeremy works for an organization that lives off of donations, promotes the reformation of Islam, and cannot even explain how it will happen.

Strike two!: Not only did Jeremy fail to explain how Islam will reform, neither could Raheel. Because that email was sent out on March 23rd. It is now April 4th. So those “few” days have turned into nearly two weeks….

Strike three!: America’s poster boy so called moderate Muslim Dr. Zuhdi Jasser also cannot explain how Islam will reform.

If you have been donating some of your hard earned money to The “Moderate” Muslim Money Maker known as The Clarion Project, you might want to demand a refund.

 

 

Aposte Hirsi Ali: We Must Reach out to the Reformers

Or in Other Words, Let us Continue With the Islamicide of West 

Back in March of 2015 Apostate Hirsi Ali, who I will call Apostate Ali, released a book entitled “Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now’. In response I wrote a three part rebuttal. In it I exposed the fact that she has no answers. Just the usual fantasy of an Islamic reformation. As she is against banning the burqa, against banning all Muslim immigration, against the mass deportations of Muslims, and against banning the Koran.

“I think that’s ridiculous, and I’ve been very hard on him for that,” Hirsi Ali said when asked about Wilders’ call for a ban on the Koran and mass deportations. “He and I are not friends at all.”

No wonder her and the Great Geert Wilders parted ways. Because anyone who is paying attention to this issue knows that her policies are nothing more than a slow Islamicide.

Apparently positive results do not matter to her though. Because in the wake of the implosion of America’s poster boy “moderate” Muslim, Zudhi Jasser, Apostate Ali still calls for the reformation of Islam. A policy that not even her friend Jasser can explain.

From the The “Islamic Reform” page of Jasser’s American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) website.

Apostate Ali Misleads the Public

Cutting to the Chase ~ Ali Does not Fight Islam, She Fights for it 

Conclusion Page 61

The dominant strategy from 9/11 through the present,
focusing only on Islamist violence, has failed. In focusing
only on acts of violence, we have ignored the ideology
that justifies, promotes, celebrates, and encourages violence, and
the methods of dawa used to spread that ideology.

Without question, certain military operations against jihadist
groups could be conducted more effectively. The virtual abandonment
of Iraq, the overreliance on air power and drone strikes,
the belief that terrorist networks can somehow be decapitated:
all of these have been fundamental tactical errors. Nevertheless,
a return to the highly effective counterinsurgency tactics of the
Iraq “surge” and its counterpart in Afghanistan, while necessary,
cannot be regarded as a sufficient response to the threat we face.
Plainly, we cannot continue to fight political Islam by engaging in large-scale foreign military interventions. The American public has not unreasonably lost faith in that approach. So what else can be done?

First, we need a paradigm shift that recognizes how violent
jihad is intertwined with the ideological infrastructure of dawa.157
In the old paradigm, we focused on combating Islamic terrorism

62 the challenge of dawa

In the new paradigm, we must continue to seek the destruction
of groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda, but we must also
develop a suitable strategy to combat dawa.

This will reopen—if it was ever over—the contentious debate
on how to balance civil rights with the need for security. There
are trade-offs to be made here, as always. It is clearly fatalistic to
suggest, as the Obama administration did, that Americans must
learn to live with the terrorist threat and that, on the basis of
statistics, Americans are more in danger from their own bathtubs
than from Islamist terrorists. The terrorist threat cannot
be measured only by the number of successful terrorist attacks.
The threat also includes the many attacks that were thwarted by
effective security measures and, more importantly, the unknown
plots currently being hatched, and the probability that such plots
will grow more numerous and more dangerous in the future.
Bathtubs do not plot to overthrow the American way of life. The
Islamists do.

It is the job of Congress to find the right balance in the face of
this specific threat between our rights and freedoms and a policy
package that is effective in combating the threat. Protection of
the religious rights of the members of the Muslim minority who
are not engaged in Islamist dawa should be an integral part of that package.

Congress must give the president in this war the tools he needs
to identify and dismantle the infrastructure of dawa in the United
States: the network of radical Islamist centers, associations, and
mosques that perpetuate political Islam in its most radical form, even if they themselves do not perpetrate the violence that they so often preach.

This work is urgent. Two successive administrations have
approached the problem of political Islam with a completely

Ayaan Hirsi Ali 63

flawed strategy: the illusion that a line could somehow be drawn
between Islam, “a religion of peace,” adhered to by a moderate
majority, and “violent extremism,” engaged in by a tiny minority.
President Trump has already identified a different course
of action. In August he pledged that his administration would
“speak out against the oppression of women, gays, and people of
different faith” in the name of Islam. While the Obama administration
has shunned proponents of Islamic reform, Trump vowed
to “be a friend to all moderate Muslim reformers in the Middle East, and [to] amplify their voices. This includes speaking out against the horrible practice of honor killings,” as well as establishing as “one of my first acts as president . . . a Commission on Radical Islam which will include reformist voices in the Muslim community.”158 He also declared that “we should only admit into this country those who share our values and respect
our people”—screening would-be immigrants for links not just to
terrorism but also to political Islam as an ideology.

I warmly welcome those words and hope that they will be
turned into deeds soon. This report is intended to help the new
administration put these long-overdue corrections to US policy
into swift and effective action.

Detailed Policy Recommendations

The recommendations made here to President Trump’s administration
can be grouped under seven headings:

General

• The administration should acknowledge that combating
political Islam by military means alone is not working.
• The administration should define the enemy more clearly:
political Islam (Islamism) is not just a religion, but is also a
political ideology.
• The administration should understand the significance of
Islamist dawa, the subversive, indoctrinating precursor to
jihad.
• The administration should ensure that key personnel in all
relevant agencies understand the risk of Islamism, Islamist
dawa activities, and militant jihad.
• The administration should choose its language carefully.
Ideology is about persuasion. The administration must learn
to persuade the leaders of the other branches of government,

66 the challenge of dawa

the American people, allied countries, and Muslims that
Islamism is a hazard and poses risks to both national security
and America’s constitutional order.

Government Outreach

• The administration should recognize the diversity of Muslim
citizens and support Islamic reformers here and around the
world.
• In reaching out to the Muslim American community, the
administration should ally itself with genuine Muslim
moderates and reformers, not with “nonviolent” Islamists.

Was Zuhdi Jasser one of those “genuine moderates and reformers?

I do not know what Islamism and Islamists are. I do know what Muslims are though. They are the followers of the enemy ideology called Islam.

Name the enemy or lose the war.

The Clarion Project’s “Moderate” Muslim Money Maker

For years I have been warning the public about how The Clarion Project misleads the public on Islam. Even challenging their spokesperson Ryan Mauro to a debate on the issue.

Not only are they misleading America on Islam. They are also lining their pockets as they do so. Even asking President Trump for funding. As Just a few weeks ago Ryan Mauro appealed to the public that The President should financially aid Muslim groups that “fight Islamism”.

 

Now which organization would fit that bill? Well one would be Zuhdi’s American Islamic Forum for Democracy.

Who is a board member of Clarion? Zuhdi Jasser of course.

What a “coincidence”!

Now we go full circle, because Jasser himself has also made a recent public appeal for funding.

Jasser:

I can guess why we had shortcomings in outreach. If we had more funding, we could study this more scientifically…No one knows truly how that majority of Muslims feels about Islamist ideologies. National security is in desperate need of helping us study that. …We have not been able to effectively reach out to the majority of Muslims because of resources and the absence of effective platforms.

That statement was made after he reached out to 3000 U.S. Mosques inviting them to join him in a reformation of Islam. Yet only 40 replied.

National Security? Like Ryan he means the Trump administration.

Is that so Zudhi? That’s your “guess”? Unlike you Zuhdi, I do not have to “guess” why you had what you call shortcomings. I know why. For starters the Koran clearly states that the words of Allah cannot be changed.

Koran 6:34

Koran 10:64

Koran 18:27

How will funding Jasser change the words of Allah? Is Allah on the take? Can he be bribed? How much will it cost? Millions of billions of trillions of dollars? Considering Allah “rules the universe” why would he need the money?

Coming up next: The Bait, The Reform Fantasy