Pamela Geller’s Hypocritical Support of a “Reformation of Islam”

10 64All it takes is for a Muslim to say something non-Muslims want to hear, and many in the non-Muslim community come running in support. If one of them says Islam does not condone terrorism, or that Islam will reform they are mistakenly paraded around as the “savior” of the free world. Some examples of this from the past are “Muslims Against Sharia”, a fraudulent group that I had exposed on my first site, After them I encountered Shoaib Choudhury of Bangladesh who I exposed on Facebook. A so called moderate who had threatened to sue in an effort to silence me, and ended up bilking non-Muslims out of 10’s of thousands of dollars.

One of the most notable Muslims “saviors” of humanity was Dr. Tahir ul-Qadri of Pakistan. Whose “Islam is Peace” fatwa was all the rage in the non-Islamic community back in 2010. A fatwa that was easily refuted on this site. Then there is America’s “moderate” Muslim poster boy Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, who was so easily refutable by me that he blocked me from his Twitter account just for questioning his so called “reformation” campaign.

(Click on images to enlarge.)
Jasser blocks NAI

Today’s “moderate” Muslim rage is all about the President of Egypt Al Sisi, and I know she has done some excellent work with her transit ads, but of all people Pamela Geller should have known better.


Egypt’s President Sisi: A Titan For Freedom in the Islamic World Calls for Reformation of Islam

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi gave an extraordinary, groundbreaking speech on Islam on New Year’s day.

Sisi said that the “corpus of [Islamic] texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years” are “antagonizing the entire world”; that it is not “possible that 1.6 billion people [reference to the world’s Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants


And to think that Obama opposed this visionary and supported the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood party. Imagine a President of the United States backing the savages against so singular a voice for change. Look for Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood groups in the US (CAIR, MAS, ISNA et al) to tear Sisi a new one.

Geller Al Sisi

As you can see she calls him a visionary and implies that Islam could actually change. But in the past she criticized Zuhdi Jasser (rightfully so) for having the same vision. How about the UK’s “moderate” Muslim think thank the Quilliam Foundation, are they going to save the UK from Islam? Apparently she does not think so, and in the past had said the following about “moderate” Islam.

Pamela Geller:

I have long derided the “moderate Islam” meme as a theory with no basis in reality or history. It’s wishful thinking, dangerous, and suicidal.

So why the change of heart? Why the weakening of a message? Why suddenly send out a message of false hope? One that is slowly killing the West.

Instead of promoting the fantasy of Islam reforming she should have explained to her readers why it will not happen. But since she didn’t, I will take the lead and do it.

The first reason is that Koranic verse 10:64 states the words of the Koran cannot be changed..

Koran 10:64: Altafsir. com

{ لَهُمُ ٱلْبُشْرَىٰ فِي ٱلْحَياةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا وَفِي ٱلآخِرَةِ لاَ تَبْدِيلَ لِكَلِمَاتِ ٱللَّهِ ذٰلِكَ هُوَ ٱلْفَوْزُ ٱلْعَظِيمُ }

Theirs are good tidings in the life of this world: in a hadīth verified by al-Hākim this has been explained as [referring to] a propitious vision which an individual might have or [a vision] which another might have of that person; and in the Hereafter: Paradise and reward. There is no changing the Words of God, no failing of His promises; that, mentioned, is the supreme triumph.

From there we can move onto the fact that in the Koran there is a thing called the “Seal of the Prophets”. Meaning there will be no other prophet after Mohammad.

Koran 33:40:

{ مَّا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَآ أَحَدٍ مِّن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَـٰكِن رَّسُولَ ٱللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ ٱلنَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيماً }

Muhammad is not the father of any man among you: he is not Zayd’s biological father and so it is not unlawful for him to marry his [former] wife Zaynab [after him]; but, he is, the Messenger of God and the Seal of the Prophets, and so he will not have a son that is a [fully grown] man to be a prophet after him (a variant reading [for khātim al-nabiyyīna] has khātam al-nabiyyīn, as in the instrument [known as a] ‘seal’, in other words, their [prophethood] has been sealed by him). And God has knowledge of all things, among these is the fact that there will be no prophet after him, and even when the lord Jesus descends [at the end of days] he will rule according to his [Muhammad’s] Law.

In order for Islam to reform and become a non-dominating, non-violent religion. Muslims would have to rid Islam of its central figure, Mohammad.


That is NOT going to happen.

In order to win this war we need a strong consistent message. One that does not mislead the public into believing that “moderate” Muslims are going to save us from the brutality of Islamic rule. One that believes only the absolute truth about Islam will save our future generations from the chains of Islam. That is the message of North American Infidels. A message that we will not back off on!


Please join the nation’s most assertive anti-Islamic organization. You can do so by clicking HERE.

15 comments for “Pamela Geller’s Hypocritical Support of a “Reformation of Islam”

Comments are closed.