Sharia Law (Islamic Law) 101: Non-Muslims Under Sharia
This first installment shows us how non-Muslims, are treated as second-class citizens under Islamic rule. I will not add any commentary to the laws, this way people can print it out if they like. They are pretty self explanatory, though if anyone has any questions please ask them in the comment section below.
Thank you.
JUSTICE CHAPTER: NON-MUSLIM SUBJECTS OF THE ISLAMIC STATE (AHL AL-DHIMMA)
o11.1 A formal agreement of protection is made with citizens who are:
(1) Jews;
(2) Christians;
(3) Zoroastrians;
(4) Samarians and Sabians, if their religions do not respectively contradict the fundamental bases of Judaism and Christianity;
(5) and those who adhere to the religion of Abraham or one of the other prophets (upon whom be blessings and peace).
o11.2 Such an agreement may not be effected with those who are idol worshippers, or those who do not have a Sacred Book or something that could have been a book.
(A: Something that could have been a Book refers to those like the Zoroastrians, who have remnants resembling an ancient Book. As for the psuedoscriptures of cults that have appeared since Islam (n: such as the Sikh, Baha’is, Mormons, Qadianis, etc.) they are neither are nor could be a Book since the Koran is the final revelation.)o11.3 Such an agreement is only valid when the subject peoples:
(a) follow the rules of Islam (o11.5) (A: those mentioned below (o11.5) and those involving public behavior and dress, though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject communities have their own laws, judges, and courts, enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves);
(b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)
THE NON-MUSLIM POLL TAX
o11.4 The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is on dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per year) The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon.
It is collected with leniency and politeness, as are all debts, and it not levied on women, children, or the insane.o11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:
(1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness:
(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar)
(3) are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykun”;
(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches
o11.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days (when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).
o11.7 A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances, or enter any other mosque without persmission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches without their permission).
o11.8 It is obligatory for the caliph to protect those of them who are in Muslim lands just as he would Muslims, and to seek the release of those captured.
o11.9 If non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state refuse to conform to the rules of Islam or pay the non-Muslim poll tax, than their agreement with the state has been violated. (dis: o11.11) (A: though if only one of them disobeys, it concerns him alone).
o11.10 The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;
(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;
(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;
(4) kills a Muslim;
(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.
o11.11 When a subject’s agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).
PRISONERS OF WAR
o9.14 When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph considers the interests
(O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or a Muslim captive held by the enemy.
If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed , and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.
.jpg)
.jpg)
Meet the principal of Al Azhar and some of his pupils.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhKewS_LSsU&
Too bad it was taken down. Thank anyway.
And Fox News, and their major Saudi Shareholder, are helping bring this to you.
Then we have the rest of the media, which will not even touch the subject of Sharia.
I do not believe Fox News has a part in bowing before Muslims.
Muslims are ruthless. They would commit genocide against non-Muslims, especially Christians to rule the world.
Muslims must be stopped from coming to America!
No mosque at Ground Zero and Sharia Law in the USA!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhaBSPGBXco&feature=related
Actually, arselifters have killed more Hindus than anything else. Approximately 80 million of them in their bloodthirsty conquest of India. All up, its estimated that they have killed 250 to 300 million people.
As she says in ‘Poltergeist’….
“They’re here!!”
“Here is a zunnar to wear”
“Here is a yellow Star of David to wear”
Seamless.
I think you missed o9.13
O9.13
When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.
There is more. Kuffar can not testify in court. Women can only testify in civil, not criminal cases.
It is a 1251 page book. the download is about 33mb. You can find a link to it at Crusader’s Armory, in the Sharia menu.
Thank you so much, this is so important to know!
I am sharing your post and of course will credit!
Thanks for helping out!
While “Reliance of the Traveler” may be overwhelming for some, there is a concise abstract of Sharia Law distributed by the Center for the Study of Political Islam. The booklet is titled “Sharia Law for Non-Muslims” and it is only 47 pages long. One of the startling revelations is that the Quran is not the primary source of Sharia Law. Only 14% of it can be traced to commands in the Quran. The rest is pure Muhammad.
Strictly speaking, since Mahound fabricated the koran, sharia is 100% pure Mahound.
A wonderful job. Super helpful inoframtion.
Gw9i6R etiwcyciixdl
I can’t tell you any MMuslims that know anything about’The Relance of the Traveller. Muslims certainly dont read it.
Listen, don’t come here and make comments that have nothing behind them. Al Azhar is the highest learning Islamic school in the world, and you do not speak for the Muslim community.
It is Muslim scripture.
If Muslims don’t read it, then they are practicing a version of their faith that doesn’t include it.
But the law is still there.
And there are plenty of Muslims who have read it, believe in its superiority to the Law = reason formula.
Your religion, your god is anti-humanistic, cruel, and warlike.
He is Ashur and Enlil both reborn.
Parallel post to this is Nonie Darwish’s commentary on
“US Constitution is Shariah Compliant.”
Just published on ITF.
More tools for the arsenal.
One simple law should be applied to all religions in the U.S.
“No religious law shall supercede the laws of the United States and any U.S. law violated in the name of religion shall be prosecuted in the same manner that any other violation of U.S. law shall be prosecuted.
This law shall be applied equally to ALL RELIGIONS.”
How difficult would it be to draft a proposed law based on what Louisiana and Oklahoma did? To protect Americans from Shariah law ever being implemented.
Then, sending that law to every state in the Union.
Mad Pig Shariah didn’t mention if Texans could keep their guns or not. That’s good. So we’ll keep our guns and blow those smart alecky Muslims to kingdom come if they get smart with us. It wouldn’t do any good if Mad Pig Shariah changed its laws to confiscate guns. I know Americans, especially Texans; those SOB’s would have a hell of fight, and they would lose. In Texas, we have a right to blow heads off if thugs break into our homes, thanks to Gov. Perry.
A new host took Rush Limbaugh’s place today. This new host said that the proposed Muslim Mosque at ground zero should be called the “Murder Mosque.” I agree; it’s most apropos. What do you think?
I 100% agree
Chris,
thanks so much for this!
Your’re welcome.
I just left an LDS site and as you may know many LDS memebers feel a kinship with muslims and believe they are just being treated with prejudice they way LDS memebers believe they were. I was reading an article by a guy who was talking about those bigots protesting the Temecula mosque and how he intended as a good Mormon to attend the ground breaking. The following is a reply to his post he got from a Mormon who had served in Iraq as an intelligence officerthis guy really explains the reality of the muslim situation here in the US. thought I would share as it reflects everything you are saying on your blog:
I believe there is a basic misunderstanding of the nature of Islam in the West, including within our church. I am an Army Military Intelligence officer with over 28 years of service, an Iraq War veteran, and have had the privilege of being tutored by some of the greatest minds in America on the true nature of Islam. I have read and studied the Quran numerous times. I am also a faithful LDS member. While I also have a positive view of most Muslims, I cannot say the same of Islam and Sharia Law, which, as non-Muslims, ultimately calls for my destruction—and yours. This is not a statement of hatred, but rooted in fact that I have come to learn over many years of study and teaching to other service members in formal instruction. I have even had Muslim service members in my course where I cover this information, and they have concurred with its accuracy.
The West has been deliberately misled to believe that Islam is a religion, when it is not. In the United States, this position is misused to shield Islam behind our First Amendment against any criticism or deeper understanding of its true place in history, or of the dangerous implications of Sharia Law. Ask any Muslim, and they will tell you that Islam is not just a religion, but an entire way of life. That way of life includes its own codified law: Sharia. The intent of Sharia is to supersede ALL other law on Earth, everywhere. This includes our own U.S. Constitution, which we know from the D&C to have been inspired by God. Thus, Sharia and our Constitution are in direct contradiction with each other. A rudimentary understanding of Sharia Law makes this plain.
You mention that you love to visit mosques. The West has been misled to believe that the mosque is nothing more than a place of worship. But it is much more than that. Following the precedents set by Muhammad, the mosque is also used as a meeting place to plan military campaigns, to house fighters/terrorists, and to store weapons, something that non-Muslim places of worship are not used for. Mosques are constructed also to establish religious dominance over an area or a people, as demonstrated by the grand mosques in Istanbul (formerly a church), and Cordoba (which is the name of the controversial mosque in NYC), among many others. Again, this is not the purpose of other non-Muslim meeting houses, including our own temples. Those decent people in Temecula have good reason to be outraged. Mosques ultimately are symbols of tyranny, especially when they are built in such a way as to tower over everything else. Symbolism has great meaning to Muslims, as in many other cultures.
As for the quotes you used from the protesters, they were factually correct:
1. Anyone with an understanding of the values of our Founding Fathers knows that our country was founded on Christian principles. As Mormons, we have a deeper understanding of this truth than most. That, coupled with the understanding of the eventual intent of Islam, people would and should feel threatened.
2. I don’t know who the “they” were that the protester was referring to as far as who are “known terrorists”. If he was referring to the 9-11 hijackers, then he would be correct. If he was referring to all Muslims, then that would be an obvious falsehood. But I think based upon the history—both ancient and recent—of Muslim-sponsored Jihad campaigns, such a statement would come from a position of fear more than hatred.
3. As far as “being trained to kill people from the time they’re in their youth,” if one looks at the Pakistani madrassas, this is an accurate and non-bigoted statement. A rudimentary reading and understanding of the Quran would also confirm this statement. Just read Quran 9:5, the “ayat saif” or Verse of the Sword. There are numerous other verses like this, but this is the most obvious one. This is also the verse that abrogates all of the peaceful verses in the Quran.
I trust that you have read the Quran and have a full understanding of the Doctrine of Abrogation as it applies to the Quran. Anyone who does not is not capable of understanding the implications of Islam and Sharia Law. If you have not done so, then I highly encourage you to research and apply the Abrogation Doctrine to the verses of the Quran, and then read it chronologically instead of cover to cover, which makes little sense. To speak about Islam without having done so is to speak from a position of ignorance.
The Calvary Baptist Church’s statement that you quoted about their concerns of Islam itself are also valid, as well as legally (under Sharia law) and historically accurate. Your retort about demonstrating freedom of speech is an obvious emotional response, but not factual. We in the West continue to be deliberately misled by organizations such as CAIR/HAMAS that Islam is 1. A religion, and 2. Peaceful, when it is neither. Other than Judaism, Islam is the only “religion” with its own codified law. The difference is that Judaism specifically mandates that Jewish Law does NOT replace or supplant any secular laws, and that they apply to Jews only. Sharia Law is intended to apply to EVERYONE, Muslim or not, and replaces and supplants ALL other law, including the U.S. Constitution. Since Article 6 states that “this Constitution shall be the law of the land,” any effort to replace it with Sharia law is treason. However, this is the intent of Islamic Doctrine—everywhere and always—as REQUIRED and UNDISPUTED by Sharia Law. Imams cannot cherrypick which parts of Sharia they choose to follow: if you are a practicing Muslim, it is all or nothing. Muslims are either pious or heretics; there is no in-between. That is a difficult concept for Westerners to grasp, but we see it every day and shake our heads not understanding why Muslims are so eager to kill other Muslims, again, as mandated by Sharia law.
Additionally, one must study the Hadiths to properly understand Islam and Sharia law. Reading the Quran alone is a good start, but not enough. Sharia law is based upon both. It would be like only reading and applying half the Constitution as law.
When you attend the groundbreaking and dedication of the Temecula mosque, you should also deliver a highlighted copy of the Constitution to the Imam, pointing out Article 6.
What an absolutely brilliant reply , Bravo!
“American Me” Thanks so much for sharing this factual information.
An excellent post AmericanMe. I would just like to add the following about Mormons feeling ‘kinship’ with Muslims.
Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism, and Muhammad enjoy many similarities. Both claim to have received ‘new revelation’ from an angelic being (although Joseph later gave the bulk of his revelation from his translation of ‘golden plates’ written in a ‘reformed Egyptian’ language and of course, additional revelation received from ‘on high’); both attacked the Torah/Tanach and the Xtian New Testament as being altered where the ‘precious’ verses foretelling each of their specific advents were removed or lost in transcription; polygamy was a big issue with each, although it may have been acceptable in Arabia; and both appeared to receive fortuitous additional ‘revelation pertaining to their personal behavior or tastes as the circumstances presented themselves. Joseph Smith also started the “Joseph Smith Translation’ (JST) of the ‘King James’ bible in which he added back many of those ‘lost’ verses related to his personal advent which occurred in the 1830′s. No credible manuscripts have ever been found to support these numerous changes in the Torah/Tanach, and old Joe was murdered before his JST translation was completed. The main difference in Mormonism is that the ‘mantel’ of the ‘prophet’ was handed off to another. Some say it was a relative of Joseph Smith, which lead to the formation of the Reorganized LDS Church, headquartered in Independence, MO (a smaller group of Mormons likened to the Shiite brand of Islam); where the bulk of others followed the ‘apostle’ Brigham Young to Utah where the larger LDS Church is headquartered (likened to the Sunni sect of Islam). Like Muhammad, Joseph Smith made many credulous statements, some of which included his particular take on the Anglo/British Israelism theory. Like the early movement of Muhammad, Joseph Smith received ‘persecution’ during the formative years of his movement as well, and this is most likely what ‘Mormons’ mean about feeling ‘kinship’ with Muslims.
How do I know any of this??? I am an ex-Mormon who was married in a Mormon Temple and am still married to the same Mormon woman (now inactive herself) for over 34 years. There are common threads and claims in all cults, no matter upon which continent they were founded. Muslims can’t get over the ‘Crusades’ and their more than a thousand years of hate spawned by the ‘Crusades; and Mormons are still licking their wounds over the early persecution issues during their formative years. Most Mormons are great people, as are many Muslims in America, but don’t think for a minute that either would refrain from instituting more of their brands of religion upon others. Both cults feel that they are the only correct or ‘true’ religions on the face of the planet. Just my 2 cents!!!
You’re right.
Islam and Mormonism are both in the same league precisely because their adherents believe themselves to be in possession of perfect and final truth.
As a result, both faiths threaten the integrity of communities espousing other faiths and ideologies.
excellent reply. We in the UK have our EDL starting to stand up for our rights and will not let sharia take over
What are Islamic terms to describe this kind of law?
Justice, Tolerance, Freedom of Religion and Peace!
And finally it is divine law. lol!
Lan Astaslem = ?
I will never submit.
Men neither. Pislam sucks!
Am I the only person who understands that Islamism is actually a Crime Syndicate masquerading as a religion? Notice that Islamism was established solely to injure in part or to totally destroy human beings, ALL HUMAN BEINGS, including the Muslims.
ISLAMISM IS THE ONLY SO-CALLED RELIGION, ACTUALLY A CRIME SYNDICATE THAT DOES THE FOLLOWING:
Uses Suicide Bombers. No other entity does this.
Murders apostates that no longer wish to be associated to the Crime Syndicates of Islamism.
The only Crime Syndicate that practices Female Genital Mutilation.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that stones women to death.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that relegates women to second class status or worse.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that declares war on other religions in order to maim, kill, rape, and enslave its opponents. Islamism is definitely the most repressive Crime Syndicate.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that allows Muslim perverts to “marry” little female babies from the time of their birth, and then later allows the pervert Muslim husbands to legally rape the “brides” when they reach the “ripe age” of 8th or 9th years. Sometimes the Muslim perverts can’t wait that long, so the “husbands” rape the “brides” when they’re seven years old. Can’t you agree by now that Islamism is a Crime Syndicate?
Islamism isn’t the only Crime Syndicate that, in this case, murders apostates because the Mafia, another Crime Syndicate, also murders “traitors.”
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that practices Honor Killings.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that hangs, or stones homosexuals until dead.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that flogs women as old as 75 years for minor offenses.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that must give part of its Zakat (charity money) to Jihad, so that Jihad can continue committing crimes.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate whose Caliph can hold office through seizure, meaning through force.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that exempts the Caliph from serious charges such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, and drunkeness, sometimes rape.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that forgives a Muslim if he murders an apostate, someone in an Honor Killing, or an adulterer.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that rules that a Muslim may never get the death penality if he murders an “infidel.” However, the Muslim that murders another Muslim may get the death penality.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that rules that a non-Muslim may not sell a weapon that can be used against a Muslim.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that rules that no one can say anything bad about pedophile, child molester, slave owner, wife beater, adulterer, murderer, Muhammad. Isn’t that horrible that we can’t tell the truth about Muhammad?
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that rules that everyone must obey the Caliph even if he’s unjust. Har, har, har. Isn’t that funny?
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that rules that non-Muslims may not rule over anyone, not even over other non-Muslims.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that gives Muslim husbands the right to divorce their wife or wives for any whimsical reason, but the wife does not have this right.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that rules that a Muslim rapist is only required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.
Islamism is the only Crime Syndicate that allows Muslims to lie if it enhances the Crime Syndicate of Islamism. Hey, wait a minute; the Mafia also allows lying, come to think about it. But what’s the difference in Crime Syndicates? Not much.
WE MUST DESTROY THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF ISLAMISM BEFORE THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF ISLAMISM DESTROYS US AND A FEW NICE MUSLIMS WHO WISH THEY HAD THE COURAGE TO DISASSOCIATE THEMSELVES FROM THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF ISLAMISM.
Amen and Yes Sir !
All of these things have been done in the name of Jesus Christ, born of the virgin Mary and raised in Nazareth. That doesn’t make them Christian values. How would it make them Muslim values, then, if someone did them in the name of Mohammed?
Because pislam makes it clear what the koranimals must do. Arselifters who don’t do it are not true arselifters, just as those Christians who do things that Jesus told them not to do.
Did you miss this part?
“This will be my first installment on Sharia, and I just want it known that the laws I write about were taken from, the Reliance of the “Traveller, A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”. The book has the stamp of approval of Al Azhar, the world’s highest learning Islamic school.”
Please change your name until you have some knowledge on the issue.
This does not change anything about islam or that it is headed your direction. You are a target like it or not. That is unless you are a willing and commited convert whoes life will now be described by these things as well
You haven’t read the Quran, the hadiths, the sirah or Reliance of the Traveller.
You really don’t know why this site exists, or why we write what we do.
And this site will continue to not make any sense until you study Islam in the light of Western Civ and history.
Non-Muslims are not allowed to build houses of worship in Muslim countries.
Non-Muslims are treated unfairly in Muslim countries in education, government posts, employment, government tenders and are treated as third/fourth class citizens.
In America, they have all the freedom enjoying by the endemic Americans, but now they want to implement Sharia Law to have special privileges over the endemic Americans.
The Muslims are the slothful type living like parasites feeding on non-Muslims’ sweat and blood.
They pray to Allah five times a day 365 days a year hoping that Allah will put food on their tables, but when Allah fails to answer they prayers, they rob the non-Muslims for their survival/luxurious lifestyles.
Now in California, they not only building Mosque at the expense of non-Muslims, but causing nuisance to the endemic Californians with their minarets broadcasting deafening noise five times a day.
href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyqjgyzSBj0&feature=related”>CAIR Video: Calif. Mosque Minaret Approved Despite Anti-Muslim Sentiments
CAIR Video: Calif. Mosque Minaret Approved Despite Anti-Muslim Sentiments
Hi newstone,
Another victory for Islam. CAIR should have been closed down along time ago.
[...] the sake of our families future generations, we need to fight Sharia with all we have, otherwise they will [...]
[...] Koran Day”. What they are really saying is they want to do away with our freedoms, and for us to bow down to Islam. From the about the OIC [...]
[...] Islam is this. Do you have any concerns whatsoever, about your families future generations being forced to live under Islamic rule? Patting yourself on the back for being “tolerant”, does not make the the threat of Islam [...]
Pleace what will islam do to a mob killing one person
[...] Mosque a “moderate”. But the truth is that no Muslim who supports Sharia is a moderate, because Sharia calls for the domination of non-Muslims. Here is what the Imam had to say about Sharia to the Jordanian newspaper [...]
[...] On the website of his organization there is a 16 point plan to silence the critics of Islam. As per Sharia Law, they are trying to curtail liquor sales in [...]
Thanks for the reposts!
This is How Moslims Think.. Wake up America.
http://samhindu.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/facebook-sam-hindu-this-is-how-muslims-think-wake-up-america/
This will wake up all gullible Americans and yahoo generation.
Sam HIndu
Follow the “I am a Muslim Woman” link to see how Sharia treats women.
Very Interesting.
[...] see if the complaint actually states why Islam should not be recognized as a religion. It is called Sharia Law. via [...]
[...] More from allah.. nothing left to do but Glory in the Lord.. another sign that must come to pass.. Sharia Law (Islamic Law) 101: Non-Muslims Under Sharia | Logan's Warning Reply With Quote + Reply to [...]
[...] The Islamic “respect” of other religions, means that Muslims are to fight, extort, and dominate Jews and Christians. Koran verse 009.029 YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor [...]
First of all , this right-wing lunacy is kind of dumb, do you really think they can take over? I’d go on and on about that but i want to make a point.
I’m a left-wing RADICAL. Meaning Everything “America” stands for can burn in hell (Capitalism, Christianity)
But IF (REALLY IF NOT WHEN) Muslims ever tried to take over, I’d laugh. So would many others, Atheists (like myself), Christains, Right and left wingers alike. We wouldnt listen to them.
Muslims are flawed since they believe the garbage in their stupid book without questioning it. I’d never submit to a flawed creature. Infact, i’d walk up to the most Muslim one of them all, and spit in his face.
Oh yeah, f*ck Mohammed, I drew a nice big picture of him sucking a camel’s cock, and wiped my ass with it! And then i snapped a cross in half, and blew my nose in an American flag. F*ck all y’all
Peace and Love
If they go unopposed of course they will eventually takeover, because they will never stop pushing. So far they have taken over the Middle East (outside of Israel), Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, large portions of Africa, Europe, Thailand, etc. How much more of the world do they have to takeover, before Islam is to be considered a threat? Maybe one day you will be mature enough to see that Islam is a threat to the left and right.
Quote:
But IF (REALLY IF NOT WHEN) Muslims ever tried to take over, I’d laugh.
end quote.
You wouldn’t be laughing for long, I assure you.
You are a nihilist.
well you have to look at it from another perspective, bare with me for a second lets say that Islam is the truth that there is no God but Allah and Mohamed(pbuh) is his final messenger, and everything in the holy Quran is the truth and the Muslims will be the winners in this life and in the next and all those who opposed God and his laws are thrown in hell, will Sharia law make since then, can it be justified.
look at the law it elevates and separates the believers from the unbelievers cause God wants his followers to be the masters of this world and all those placed in hell to live like servants cause they choose not to obey God so they will neither enjoy this life or the next.
now think about it If God has given man laws to fallow he must have put in it laws on how to treat the unbelievers, what do you think he would say about those who choose not to believe in him, in the end he is going to place them in hell.
now is the law fair and just does it in anyway harm the unbelievers or does it encourage them to want to become Muslims.
today how many people want to be like the actors they see on tv or act and dress like music stars the fine example they set, God put this laws on earth as a mercy for unbelievers
Your point is totally moot because sharia law is full of hate and oppression even toward those that are believers of their allah.
Quote:
look at the law it elevates and separates the believers from the unbelievers cause God wants his followers to be the masters of this world and all those placed in hell to live like servants cause they choose not to obey God so they will neither enjoy this life or the next.
end quote.
Anti-humanism at its finest.
If the individual has worth, even a worth you cannot quantify or define, then everything you suggest is a crime against humanity itself.
You exalt God to destroy humanity.
Your religion is profane, a mockery of everything good.
Nothing can come of it but the corruption by power and the seduction by violence.
You desipse the infidel.
You are free to destroy the infidel not because God loves you, but because you hate and hate.
Islam is profane.
Mohammed is a false prophet.
The Koran is a profane book filled with “revelations” from a spirit of the world.
If God told you to kill, you would do it.
If God told me to kill, I would strike his face.
Why?
I know that God would never command murder.
Ye shall know them by their fruits.
We have seen the bloody fruits of Islam.
We repudiate it, we are repulsed by it, and nothing you say will ever change that.
[...] For more information on Obama and Islam, click on the link below and hear what Osama Dakdok, who was raised in Egypt, has to say. Dakdok has translated the Koran into English and can give you the skinny on this whole sordid affair. http://www.thestraightway.org. Or for more information you may go to http://loganswarning.com/2010/08/26/sharia-law-islamic-law-101-non-muslims-under-sharia/ [...]
[...] Sharia Law (Islamic Law) 101: Non-Muslims Under Sharia | Logan’s … [...]
[...] those new to the subject, jizya is part of Shariah Law.) The only problem is that the Koran states the actions of Mohammad are to be followed for all [...]
[...] well trained and armed army of thugs, fellons, cowards and those who believe that only Muslims and Islamic/Sharia law should govern the United States and the world. The United States has become a training ground for [...]
We need to wake up America! This is a very real threat to our whole way of life. I like the way someone put it, it’s not a religion, it’s a way of life.
[...] SNIP In U.S. cities, African Americans account for about two-thirds of Muslims, said Khalid Blankinship, a Temple University expert on Islam who embraced the religion in 1973. He said most Muslims, regardless of ethnicity, shared the same Sunni doctrine. [...]
What does it say about athists and others ‘not of the book’?
In Islam, such people don’t even have the right to life.
WE DON’T WANT TO USE IT YOUR SHIRA LAW AND BRING YOUR LAW TO YOUR NATION IN MIDDLE EAST AND ALL WEST NATION WILL NEVER WANT YOUR LAW ..BASTARD
[...] first ones would be to end all Muslim immigration, and officially ban the governmental aspects of Sharia Law. Only a foolish non-Muslim would let Islam take over America in the name of freedom of [...]
Hello there, You have performed a great job. I’ll definitely digg it and in my opinion recommend to my friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this site.