Unfortunately many non-Muslims continue to want to trust Muslims and support many of them just because they are polite as they whitewash Islam. Much of this takes place at open Mosques. And who I believe is the top culprit at this in America is Dr. Sabeel Ahmed of Gain Peace. Who has no qualms about misleading non-Muslims on Islam.

Striking from all angles. From misleading the elderly, exploiting the COVID pandemic, exploiting racial dialogue, and misleading non-Muslims at interfaith meetings.

Well now we see his true end-game. Sharia Law.

Sharia ‘Already Here,’ Speaker Tells Plano Mosque Open House

A Plano mosque’s outreach event told visitors Sharia is “already here,” even as former Muslims who fled Islamic regimes warned that Sharia becomes dangerous when it gains state power.

An open house at a Plano mosque drew attention Saturday when a speaker present stated that “Sharia is already here.”

According to The Dallas Express, the meeting took place at the Islamic Association of Collin County and was organized by WhyIslam Dallas in partnership with GainPeace and ICNA Dallas.

The event, entitled “Understanding Islam & Shariah: Myths vs Facts,” provided an opportunity to “learn about Islam, ask questions, and engage in respectful, meaningful conversations,” according to a posting.

Unlike his interfaith meetings, here at Logan’s Warning you can actually learn just how oppressive Sharia is in regards to non-Muslims. 

The following is an excerpt  from the Reliance of the Traveller, A Classic Manual of Islamic Scared  Law. Which has the stamp of approval of the world-renowned Egypt’s Al Azhar University.

JUSTICE CHAPTER: NON-MUSLIM SUBJECTS OF THE ISLAMIC STATE (AHL AL-DHIMMA)

o11.1 A formal agreement of protection is made with citizens who are:

(1) Jews;

(2) Christians;

(3) Zoroastrians;

(4) Samarians and Sabians, if their religions do not respectively contradict the fundamental bases of Judaism and Christianity;

(5) and those who adhere to the religion of Abraham or one of the other prophets (upon whom be blessings and peace).

o11.2 Such an agreement may not be effected with those who are idol worshippers, or those who do not have a Sacred Book or something that could have been a book.
(A: Something that could have been a Book refers to those like the Zoroastrians, who have remnants resembling an ancient Book. As for the psuedoscriptures of cults that have appeared since Islam (n: such as the Sikh, Baha’is, Mormons, Qadianis, etc.) they are neither are nor could be a Book since the Koran is the final revelation.)

o11.3 Such an agreement is only valid when the subject peoples:

(a) follow the rules of Islam (o11.5) (A: those mentioned below (o11.5) and those involving public behavior and dress, though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject communities have their own laws, judges, and courts, enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves);

(b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)

THE NON-MUSLIM POLL TAX

o11.4 The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is on dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per year) The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon.
It is collected with leniency and politeness, as are all debts, and it not levied on women, children, or the insane.

o11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

(1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness:

(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar)

(3) are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykun”;

(4) must keep to the side of the street;

(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

(7) and are forbidden to build new churches

o11.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days (when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).

o11.7 A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances, or enter any other mosque without persmission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches without their permission).

o11.8 It is obligatory for the caliph to protect those of them who are in Muslim lands just as he would Muslims, and to seek the release of those captured.

o11.9 If non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state refuse to conform to the rules of Islam or pay the non-Muslim poll tax, than their agreement with the state has been violated. (dis: o11.11) (A: though if only one of them disobeys, it concerns him alone).

o11.10 The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;

(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;

(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;

(4) kills a Muslim;

(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

o11.11 When a subject’s agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

PRISONERS OF WAR

o9.14 When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph considers the interests
(O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or a Muslim captive held by the enemy.
If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed , and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

Back to the Article.

The statements made by GainPeace Executive Director Dr. Sabeel Ahmed were in reference to the moral and religious practices already being carried out by Muslims living in the area. “Right now, as you eat your lunch [provided by the event], you are part of the practice of Sharia by Muslims,” said Ahmed.

Why are they eating halal food in the first place? Eating halal only normalizes Islam in America.

Even though Dr. Ahmed says Sharia is here he still tries to sugarcoat what Sharia is. As proven above. What can we expect considering I infiltrated one his workshops and have him on film encouraging Muslims to mislead non-Muslims?

SNIP:

In contrast to Isagholi’s comments, Jacob Kennedy of Indivisible Frisco stated that while he opposes “any attempt to impose religious law in the United States,” he also believes “Muslims remain free to practice their faith privately.”

Link to Article

Giving Islam the benefit of the doubt just doesn’t work at all. It is time for America to face that fact.