Trial Time: Pamela Geller ~ You’re Charged W/Aiding and Comforting the Enemy

If you follow my work over the years you probably know that I am willing to challenge anyone who promotes false hope in regards to the threat of Islam. No matter how high profile the name is. From Mohamed Zuhdi Jasser’s unexplained call to reform Islam, to the Clarion Project’s false hope of peacefully coexisting with Islam, to the Middle East Forum’s Daniel Pipes dream of a non-threatening Islam that does not exist. Which bring us to today’s subject matter, Pamela Geller of the Geller Report.

Now I freely admit that Pamela did tremendous work against the Ground Zero Mosque, and great work with her anti-Islam NY Subway ads. Unfortunately over the years she has weakened to the point of actually aiding and comforting the enemy. A case I will easily prove.

The Charges: Aiding and Comforting the Enemy


All Rise for the Honorable Judge Christopher Logan

Recently Miss Geller has been promoting the so called peace deals between Muslim majority countries and Israel.

Exhibit – A

To view the article click here.

Now I support President Trump, but I also deal in reality and refuse mislead the public on the threat of Islam. Because no matter how much good he does, his words do not override the words of the Allah. As Muslim’s believe that the Koran consists of the literal words of Allah. Also believing that Islam is perfect.

Koran 5:3

Apparently Pamela does not really care that Christians are severely persecuted in Indonesia, and is even willing to reward the country despite this atrocious behavior.

To view the article click here.

Exhibit – B

To view the article click here.

Exhibit – C

To view the article click here.

Exhibit – D

Empowering the Enemy

Experts react: Sudan and Israel reach historic peace agreement

Snip

The agreement comes at the same time as Trump announced that he will remove Sudan from the US State Sponsors of Terrorism List in recognition of the country’s progress towards democracy after the ouster of former leader Omar al-Bashir in 2019 and in return for a compensation package from Sudan for US terrorism victims. In a joint statement, the Trump administration said that the United States “will take steps to restore Sudan’s sovereign immunity and to engage its international partners to reduce Sudan’s debt burdens, including advancing discussions on debt forgiveness consistent with the Highly Indebted Poor Countries Initiative.”

Yes Sudan coughed up the $335 million dollars in “compensation”. The problem is what they get in return.

Israel and Sudan will also “begin economic and trade relations, with an initial focus on agriculture,” and will “meet in the coming weeks to negotiate agreements of cooperation in those areas as well as in agriculture technology, aviation, migration issues and other areas for the benefit of the two peoples.”

Snip

“The United States for its part is showing a willingness to keep raising the ante. In exchange for the deal, Sudan will be removed from the state sponsor of terror list and will enjoy millions if not billions of dollars of economic assistance from the UAE and the United States. Subsequent Arab countries contemplating peace—each with their own long list of demands—are sure to take note.”

To view the article click here.

Exhibit – E

The Israel-UAE-Bahrain peace deals, explained

Snip

In the course of four pages, the Israel-UAE document says both nations will establish “full normalization of bilateral ties,” embassies with resident ambassadors and cooperation in an array of areas, from investment to tourism to agriculture. It also calls for both parties to “foster mutual understanding, respect, co-existence and a culture of peace between their societies in the spirit of their common ancestor, Abraham.”

Snip

Neither the UAE nor Bahrain have ever attacked Israel; nor has Israel attacked them. So there was no peace to be made. And unlike with Egypt and Jordan, Israel and the two countries are far from each other.

Empowering the enemy for no reason at all. (LW)

To the view the article click here.

Exhibit – F

U.S. plans to sell 50 F-35 fighter jets to the UAE after accord with Israel

The State Department on Thursday informally notified Congress that it plans to sell F-35 fighter jets to the United Arab Emirates, according to the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

The deal would include up to 50 of the Lockheed Martin-made jets at a cost of $10.4 billion, a congressional aide said. If the sale is completed, the UAE would become only the second country in the Middle East to fly the advanced fighter jets after Israel.

Context: The sale of F-35s to the UAE was made possible by an accord signed in September at the White House that normalized relations between Abu Dhabi and Tel Aviv.


To view the article click here.

Questioning the Defendant

  1. Fact is that there are already Sharia Courts in Israel, and the call to prayer is being broadcast onto some of the streets of the country. So how does Israel benefit by allowing more Muslims into the country? How does Israel benefit in the long run from importing more Islam?
  2. Approximately three years ago you said, and I quote, “Muslim immigration means more Islamic terrorism.” So why are you pushing for more Muslim immigration into Israel?
  3. In the same video that I just quoted you from, you spoke of jihad terror. So why are you willing to arm Muslims? Especially when Mohammad himself said it was OK for Muslims to lie in war and “to settle disagreements”. Why should Muslims be given the benefit of the doubt? Where is trusting Muslims working out for a host non-Islamic nation? France? Germany? India? The United Kingdom?
  4. What if all 50 Muslim majority nations signed “peace deals” with Israel? Would you support empowering the Islamic world with financial aid and arms? Are you willing to shift the balance of power from the West to the Islamic world in the name of this so called peace?
  5. Did you suddenly forget what the term “hudna” stands for?
    “Simply stated, Muslims are allowed to enter into a ?hudna? or temporary ceasefire with a non-Muslim enemy and then break it at any time, once they have gained enough strength to resume hostilities.”
  6. I have seen you quote the Koran quite well in some of your articles. Did you suddenly forget about Koran verse 47:35? Mohsin Khan: “So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islam), while you are having the upper hand. Allah is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.” To further explain the verse. From the world renowned Tasfir (Scholarly interpretation and explanation of the Koran.) Ibn Kathir:
    “(So do not lose heart and beg for peace while you are superior.) meaning, in the condition of your superiority over your enemy. If, on the other hand, the disbelievers are considered more powerful and numerous than the Muslims, then the Imam (general commander) may decide to hold a treaty if he judges that it entails a benefit for the Muslims. This is like what Allah’s Messenger did when the disbelievers obstructed him from entering Makkah and offered him treaty in which all fighting would stop between them for ten years. Consequently, he agreed to that. Allah then says:
  7. Kuwati Sheikh Naji Al-Kharas has not forgotten. Kuwaiti Imam Sheikh Naji Al-Kharas: All Arab Peace Agreements With The Jews Are Null And Void Because You Cannot Abolish Jihad; Permanent Peace Agreements Are Impermissible, Sheikh Naji Al-Kharas: “The Arabs have tried to negotiate and sign peace agreements with the Jews. Obviously, all these agreements are null and void. They are all null and void – the Camp David Accord, the Oslo Accord, the [Jordanian-Israeli agreement] of Wadi Arabah, and the ensuing agreements. Why are they null and void? Because they abolish the jihad. You are not allowed to sign a permanent [peace] agreement with the enemy. If you sign an agreement, it must be temporary, and that’s it. Nobody said one can sign a permanent agreement. This won’t be found in the Quran or the Sunnah. Can one abolish the jihad? The jihad must not be abolished.” Do you claim to know more about Islam than the all three of those sources Pamela?
  8. Finally, didn’t you back Robert Spencer several years ago when he issued a statement that encouraged non-Muslims to be against banning Islam?

Case Closed

Miss Geller, you have been charged with Aiding and Comforting the Enemy. How do you plead?

I will email this article to Pamela and challenge her to a video debate on the issue. Let’s see if she responds.

When I compare Pamela to me, I think of a Fantasy $eller vs. a Truth Teller. Please help me continue to promote these truths by making a one-time or monthly donation today. While my truths caused PayPal to turn against me and shut down my account, you do have the options of Patreon or Zelle.

Become a Patron!

For Zelle, please email me at Loganswarning@Hotmail.com

Thank you,

Christopher Logan

Comments

comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *