UK: Muslim Women Take to Streets, Call to Impose Sharia on us~ Videos

The women of Campaign Islam, have taken it to the streets and have sent us two messages. The first one is about our “attacks” on Islam, one of them beginning the “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day”. Please listen closely as she states the only way these “attacks” will stop, is if they usher in Islamic law. In other words, they will try and force us to stop, and trust me this Islamic organization is not the only one that wants to impose Sharia Law on us. They are uniting across the world, and non-Muslims have to man up, and stop making excuses for Islam. It will be us or them.


In this video, Campaign Islam sends a message to Muslims in the UK military. It is not one of friendship.



44 comments for “UK: Muslim Women Take to Streets, Call to Impose Sharia on us~ Videos

  1. True
    July 5, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    Do you realize that your Google ad thing is showing a “How to Convert to Islam” advertisement on your site?

    Weird coincidence or someone is screwing you.

    • admin
      July 5, 2010 at 11:16 pm

      Hi True,
      The ads go by keywords, there is nothing that I can do about it. It will change. 🙂

  2. July 5, 2010 at 11:26 pm

    It will them or us, no doubt about it at all. Many of us are are preparing for the worst case scenario. The way this country
    is going with the first mussie potus, islam
    and muslims are quite bold and think they
    have nothing to fear. People need to wake
    up and stop listening to the taqiyya that
    is spewing forth from the Islamists and
    dhimmis that keep lying to the American
    people about islam and muslims.

    I have a message for them:


    I am cross posting to PC with links and credits. Thanks Christopher.

    • admin
      July 5, 2010 at 11:33 pm

      When you post something from here, post a backtrack here to your site. We are in this together.

  3. July 5, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    I’ve said it before, there will be a holocaust, either on us or them. As a civilized westerner I’m not too fond of promoting violence but in this case, to survive the onslaught of pislam, I don’t really think we have much of a choice. It doesn’t matter which nation that falls first, be it Israel or one of the european nations. It will start a chain reaction and then one country after another will fall like domino tiles, one tile falling over the other and so on. Viewed from this perspective we are all literally in the same boat. It will be a clash of civilizations, ours against the barbaric pislam. The way I see it the arselifters have two advantages of us, outbreeding us like rats and their vile savageness.

  4. When*Pigs*Fly
    July 5, 2010 at 11:50 pm

    I think many non-muslims are waiting for the opportunity to go toe to toe.

    The hairy hordes are in for a surprise.

    • admin
      July 5, 2010 at 11:52 pm

      Our numbers are growing, but we need to get the politicians on our side.

      • When*Pigs*Fly
        July 5, 2010 at 11:59 pm

        Good point. Any suggestions? They all seem to be pandering for the immigrant votes.

        • July 6, 2010 at 5:38 am

          Sue Myrick is a member of the United States’ House of Representatives. She represents a district in North Carolina. She has an agenda formed with several other members of Congress to halt Islamization. If imposed completely, it would cripple the encroachment of that cancer into the U.S.A.

    • Ann
      July 6, 2010 at 1:46 am

      I agree. If these ass….. think we will sit back and take it, they are so wrong. We must stop cowering to these evil bitches and their ilk. who the hell do they think they are. I wish they would all go to islamic countries and leave us alone. Until we wake up to the devil within, they will continue to try and distrupt our way of life. THEY WILL NOT WIN.

      • July 6, 2010 at 2:01 am

        Ann, its OK to call them arselifters (or asslifters).

        • July 7, 2010 at 11:29 am

          At least we don’t wind up in the profanity filter as on many other sites. I don’t even understand the need of such a silly thing as a profanity filter. This or that swear word does not make me upset at all. Cutting off someones head or hands makes me upset though. Thank god they don’t beep words on radio and tv in my country. That is probably the only advantage we still have over here. In later years the word negro has become one of those no-go zones. I mean that word originates from the latin word of black, as simple as that but now they have made it racism. It’s a stroke of genius I might say, bit by bit they’re taking words from us. They’re practicing the draconian and orwellian art of newspeak. By changing the language they enslave us. They decide what we can say or not say.

          • July 7, 2010 at 9:13 pm

            Yes, I understand what you mean. That’s why I don’t like censorship – except when it comes to arselifters and their dhimmis.

  5. Adam H
    July 6, 2010 at 1:15 am

    I disagree, i dont think we do need the politicians. When enough of us are on the streets, when the heat is on, the politicians will have no choice but to get on board, otherwise they will lose their seats, and at the end of the day that is all they really care about.

    • Vas
      July 6, 2010 at 1:48 am

      You are absolutely true.

      But how do we reach the people when morons like Karen Armstrong and Dinesh D’Souza ( I hope I got the name right.) are working against us and calling us islamaphobes?

      In my experience of spreading knowledge of Islamic tenets, I found out that people go by what appears in main stream media. I am not saying that they completely trust MSM, but they have lesser trust in us, because some of commentators use abusive and harsh language.

      Actually a very interesting article was put up in and I suggest people read it, especially the comments section. It is very relevant.

    • admin
      July 6, 2010 at 12:01 pm

      That’s what I mean mate. 🙂

  6. R_not
    July 6, 2010 at 5:33 am

    And this is why I don’t really feel sorry for muslim women anywhere nor do I do one darn thing to change their plight. Why? Because the women who could try to change the plight of muslim women only work to follow or implement it.

    While there are no safe houses in any muslim country – the safe houses in the West are full of muslim women. The women are the ones who carry out genital mutilation. The women are the ones who are so vocal, so proud, when their little ones blow themselves up. They are hoping they get named as one of the saved by that martyr. It was a muslim woman, with her baby, willing to blow up an airline with the baby formula in a bottle. We see a godzillion of videos of Gazan muslim children training to be suicide bombers, etc.

  7. Fran Ingram
    July 6, 2010 at 6:40 am

    Boggles the mind, these passionate women in their weird Arab 7th century worlds. I cannot understand the attraction.
    Trapped by the ogre on the mountain, as Wafa Sultan puts it in “God of Hate.”
    Islam is of the Devil!

    • July 6, 2010 at 12:17 pm

      I completely agree.
      It is the EVIL that the Torah and the New Testament WARNED about. They knew of Many Religions that were similar. Islam is the one big one left. This is EVIL.
      How this female can stand there and think that Islam is good for her and for women, is out of my realm of understanding. The feminists, here, have said nothing. What kind of women are these?
      What kind of FEMALES support stoning of women?

      ISLAM is EVIL and the people who don’t renounce Islam are inhumane, especially if another life free from the torturers of Islam is offered.


      • Linda Strawn
        July 6, 2010 at 9:45 pm

        Yes, islam is from the pit of hell and allah is satan.
        Here is a free 295 page pdf downloadable book by Sujit Das:
        Unmasking Muhammed: The Malignant Narcissist and his Grand Delusion Allah
        Every muslim should be forced to read it to give them the sense to leave islam, and every non-muslim needs to read it to defend against those who don’t.
        The author uses extensive understanding of psychiatry, history, the Qu’ran and the life of Muhammed. It is the most exhaustive source I’ve seen. He doesn’t hold the copyright and wants this disseminated as widely as possible. Please repost this source as often as applicable.

        • admin
          July 6, 2010 at 9:55 pm

          Hi Linda,
          Thanks for the link. I will make a new post with the link in it.

        • July 8, 2010 at 8:28 am

          post on my blog as a Reference link

        • March 30, 2012 at 11:32 pm

          Exposing Sujit Das and His Blasphemous book against the Prophet of Islam (PBUH).
          Fasihuddin (PSP) in his coloumn Sujit Das ke Napak Harzasarai (Sujit Das’s unholy rubbish) published in Daily Aaj, Peshawar on Friday, March 30th, 2012, has critically evaluated the blasphemous book of Sujit Das (Bombay, India), and has beautifully exposed his venomous character, virulent fallacies, poisonous derivations and out of context narrations and self-styled explanations of many basic and authentic facts about the Holy Prophet of Islam (Peace Be Upon Him). Fasihuddin says that it is a very common propaganda technique of non-muslims or pseudo free-thinkers of the muslim world in the modern days to malign Islam, its Holy Book and the Messenger of Allah, Hazrat Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), for their petty worldly gains, cheap popularity and ulterior personal motives like cash, publicity, visas, asylum, etc in the western world. The beguiled commentators and perverted writers feel joyous over triggering violent responses from the simple, uneducated and honest muslim society. Resultantly, these pseudo free-thinkers further capitalize on such uncontrollable demonstrations and a vicious circle of radicalization starts moving round and round. This is how the vested interests further their sinister motives and ensure their mundane gains by creating more and more cleavages in the west and the muslim world and widening the gap already existing between the two. Fasihuddin has clearly identified the basic flaws and incoherence in the highly provocative account of Sujit Das, the Dirty (as he names him for Sujit feels no compunctions in uttering very low, mean and base words for the most sacred and holy personality of Islam and all religions, the Prophet Muhammad, Peace Be Upon Him). The writer in a cool, passionate way advises the muslims not to over-react to such blasphemous writings in shape of violent processions, instead they should try to tackle them in an analytical, critical and academic way, and expose their hidden meanness, intellectual dishonesty and superficial understanding of the true and sophisticated Islamic code of beliefs and the essence of its legal system. This superficiality, coupled with malicious ignorance, dishonesty of intention and personal greed, results in such undesirable, un-warranted and baseless products as that of Sujit Das, the Cursed (only a cursed person can use an abusive language against the holy personalities and prophets). Look at the name of his book: “Unmasking Muhammad, the Malignant Narcissist and His Grand Delusion Allah”. When the title is so malignant and full of venom and hatred, then what one can expect of its contents to be judged on a scholarly and value-free touchstone. Fasihuddin points at a very important fact about some other religions by quoting the Noble Prize Winner poet Rabindranath Tagore who said, in 1924, that “the real cause of the failure of Brihmo Samaj was that it lacked a dynamic personality and a practical demonstration behind it”. Islam has a very practical personality behind its teachings and tenets in the shape of its Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). Lets see a few fallacies in the account of Sujid Das’ blasphemous account:
          1. Sujit says, “Anyone who claims to be a prophet must be prepared to have his prophesy tested”. Fasihuddin says: “Didn’t the Prophet of Mercy prove his claim in front of his diehard opponents when he announced his prophethood? Why people believed in him then, and why more than 1.3 billion people even today can offer their lives for his respect, dignity and prophethood? Were those people mad and lunatics then, and are crazy today? What is Sujit’s standards for testing and what is its authenticity, validity and universality?
          2. Sujit Says: “There are enough pious and totally un-objective traditions of Muhammad preserved by the Muslim religious community, but what is lacking in these sources is honesty”: Fasihiuddin says: “What about the writings of hundreds of orientalist scholars like AR Nicholson, A R Gibb, TW Arnold, Prof. Phillip K. Hitti, Prof. Montgomery Watt, and many more who wrote very high sounding words in praise of the Holy Prophet and the Holy Book? What is Sujit’s criteria for honesty? How can he prove the content and quantity of ‘honesty’ in his own blasphemous book? Lets see his “honesty”. Sujit quotes different rivals of Islam, even of the early muslim era, the opponents in Mecca and Madina at the time of Prophet’s advent, and Sujit firmly believes in all such false accusations with no “testing of honesty” and pretends to have the power of describing all such chronic animosities as a true account! Sujit, like many others, are not ignorant of the fact that even the worst enemies of the Holy Prophet (PBHM) used to call him Sadiq (the truthful) and Ameen (the trustworthy), and they used to keep with him their belongings in case of long absence from the village. History is full of such testimony.
          3. Sujit casts his sinister aspersions on the first revelation as: “This Divine confrontation was less heavenly and more demonic”. An encounter which happened in a cave for the first time, and unexpectedly, and surely having its awesome spiritual effects, and which later proved to be the starting point of the complete revelation is ‘less heavenly’ and ‘more demonic’ in Sujit’s account. How he differentiates between the spiritual and demonic aspect of an event? With what authority and standard he can say and measure the two portion of being less and more in one event? A man who has no experience in a heavenly incidence or in a spiritual encounter, how can he realize one from the other?
          4. Sujit Says: “Muhammad gave no solid proof of his prophethood. He simply claimed to the title of Prophet of Allah….How can we be sure that Muhammad didn’t lie?” Fasihuddin says that what is the criteria of a solid proof? When people asked him for proof, didn’t Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) present anything? Was he not tested by the excellent and wise brains of his time? Didn’t they test him for more than 23 years of his Prophethood? Were all those believers dump and dupe? Sujit has shown utter ignorance and childish reasoning for proving a case on empirical basis or historical and verifiable proofs. How can we be sure that Sujit is not lying?
          5. About the Prophet’s Companions Sujit says with brazen face: “Those early companions of Muhammad not only lost their property and self-respect but the lives of their children, relatives, even their own lives. At the end of the day they returned with empty hands, disappointed and disillusioned. All of them were pathetic losers. Almost all of them died a dog’s death” (Page 208). For the rebuttal and denial of Sujit, the Cursed, this one note is enough. Who doesn’t know that what was the socio-political conditions of pre-Islamic and pagan Arabia and what made them rulers, scholars, writers, scientists, linguistic experts, administrators, military and political leaders and conquerors? Even the virulent account of the most prejudiced of the orienlatists have admired this humanizing and civilizational force of Islam and its Messenger, the Holy Prophet (PBUH) despite the fact that they don’t accept of Islam, and Sujit, the Cursed, has not an idea of any of such marvelous achievements of the Companions and their followers in the initial centuries of Islam. Fasihuddin has advised the muslims to read authentic scholars on Islam and teach their children the true muslim literature in the current age of anti-Islamic propaganda. He also advises the west not to allow, propagate or protect such sinister and malicious writings and their authors as it damages the efforts of inter-faith dialogue and a joint struggle for solving the problems of humanity and reducing its sufferings.
          6. While quoting the great Poet Allama Iqbal that the muslims are in a poor conditions due to their ignorance of the Quran and not properly following the Prophet (PBUH), Sujit says: “If Iqbal is true, then how the infidels have prospered? We, the non-muslims don’t practice Islam at all. In fact some of us even oppose Islam. Then how the infidel countries are better than Muslim countries that at least practice a bit? If the Quran is full of science, then why the Islamic countries are most backward?”
          Sujit’s account and analogy is full of his superficial knowledge about Islam, Quran, human civilization and the Rise and Fall of dynasties and empires. Iqbal’s poetic expression is not untrue when he says that the early muslims felt and understood the right meaning and message of the Holy Book and became the rulers of the major part of the world of that time. Iqbal has done a copious poetry and he clearly identifies the importance of science and technology for human progress and political dominance. His one part explains the other and shall not be read out of context. Quran is not a book of science but a book of guidance, salvation, enlightenment, moral purification and high ethics and accepted norms for leading a peaceful and productive life. Quran mentions certain guidelines to explore the hidden human faculties and natural resources and exhorts to unearth the forces and energies in the universe, by inviting the human intellect to think about the potential dividends in the globe and universe for further creation and betterment of human life. Quran doesn’t provide scientific formulae but a scientific outlook and sets on triggering a creative vision and analytical thinking in an able-minded person. Sujit’s poor knowledge is full of misleading misgivings about Islam and Quran. Unfortunately, the tender, unaware and easily impressionable minds of the young muslims are unnecessarily polluted and a dis-trust is created amongst the various communities of the world by these atheists and ‘employed’ writers like Sujit Das and others. Not only the muslims but also the true academics of other religions should disown and ignore these rubbish and blasphemous writings.
          Corrigendum: In the original coloumn a saying of Tabari is quoted. This is not from Sujit’s book but from another atheist and blasphemous writer, Abdul Kasem (Bengali) who too has written enormous baseless, superficial and extremely un-warranted things about the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the Quran, in the name of free-speech and research, whereas his account of ‘Contradictions in the Quran’ or ‘Muhammad Violated the Quran’ are full of fallacies, inaccuracies, out of context explanations and twisting meanings—all indicative of his poor knowledge of the Quaran, Arabic and Islamic teachings. Never in the history, even the diehard anti-Islam orientalists in the past had leveled such abusive, immoral, irrational and unreasonable charges against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as has been done in this malignant book of Sujit Das, the Cursed. Fasihuddin’s next coloumn will be exposing the lopsided accounts of Abdul Kasem Bangali.
          Contact: The article can be found on
          (Fasihuddin (PSP) is the President of Pakistan Society of Criminology and can be reached at

  8. boniferous
    July 6, 2010 at 6:48 am

    What westernized Muslims fail to realize is resembled in the well known photo of the Muslim in the UK holding a sign that says “behead those who claim Islam is violent”.

    These women are still westernized under neath their hijabs. These vibrant Muslims walking the streets with recorder on hip and microphone at the lips offering news flashes regarding anti-semitism or state of the ummah to Muslims are not thinking of their behavior as “haram” (taboo). It is. Under Sharia Law (for devout Muslims) it is haram for a woman to put her voice on a recorder lest she give a guy a … you know. OK? They love their prayers, their Muslim friends in the UK, they really do not consider what it is like to live under a dictator … .. They’re fools.

    • July 6, 2010 at 12:20 pm

      These fools are dangerous. They pave the way for much smarter and more nefarious forces

  9. Iain UK
    July 6, 2010 at 7:59 am

    The singing in the background on those two vids is atrocious, on the same par as the South African vuvuzela horns at the world cup. Why has there been in recent weeks such an upsurge of letterbox wearing women presenting muzzy propaganda video’s, especially those coming out of the UK? Is this going to be an ongoing new characteristic of attack on us that we need to be aware of? The use of women being thought of as less aggressive then their male counterparts and therefore we may respond, believe and listen better! Or is islam trying to show that they do respect women as equals in the struggle against the mad dog westerners?
    Maybe I have just got it completely wrong and it is because the women of islam have finally emasculated the males and have grown a pair?

  10. July 6, 2010 at 8:31 am

    Yet no one ever mentions that sharia forbids them to live with us. So does the quran.

    But it’s never mentioned….

    • July 6, 2010 at 11:24 am

      can you supply us with the direct quote?

  11. July 6, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    These women committed adultery by leaving the house without men and talking to people without their male guardians present.
    They, by sharia law, should be stoned.

    I have a petition link from the sons of the mother who “committed adultery” —>

  12. July 6, 2010 at 1:29 pm

    Why the US is in deep trouble

    A DC airport ticket agent offers some examples of why.

    1. I had a New Hampshire Congresswoman (Carol Shea-Porter) ask for an aisle seat so that her hair wouldn’t get messed up by being near the window. (On an airplane!)

    2. I got a call from a Kansas Congressman’s (Moore) staffer (Howard Bauleke), who wanted to go to Cape Town. I started to explain the length of the flight and the passport information, and then he interrupted me with, ”I’m not trying to make you look stupid, but Cape Town is in Massachusetts.”
    Without trying to make him look stupid, I calmly explained, ” Cape Cod is in Massachusetts, Cape Town is in South Africa.” His response — click.

    3. A senior Vermont Congressman (Bernie Sanders) called, furious about a Florida package we did. I asked what was wrong with the vacation in Orlando. He said he was expecting an ocean-view room. I tried to explain that’s not possible, since Orlando is in the middle of the state.
    He replied, ‘Don’t lie to me. I looked on the map and Florida is a very thin state!” (OMG)

    4. I got a call from a lawmaker’s wife (Landra Reid) who asked,

    ”Is it possible to see England from Canada ?”
    I said, ”No.”
    She said, ”But they look so close on the map.” (OMG, again!)

    5. An aide for a cabinet member (Janet Napolitano) once called and asked if he could rent a car in Dallas. I pulled up the reservation and noticed he had only a 1-hour layover in Dallas. When I asked him why he wanted to rent a car, he said, ”I heard Dallas was a big airport, and we will need a car to drive between gates to save time.” (Aghhhh)

    6. An Illinois Congresswoman (Jan Schakowsky) called last week. She needed to know how it was possible that her flight from Detroit left at 8:30 a.m., and got to Chicago at 8:33 a.m.

    I explained that Michigan was an hour ahead of Illinois, but she couldn’t understand the concept of time zones. Finally, I told her the plane went fast, and she bought that.

    7. A New York lawmaker, (Jerrold Nadler) called and asked, ”Do airlines put your physical description on your bag so they know whose luggage belongs to whom?” I said, “No, why do you ask?”

    He replied, ”Well, when I checked in with the airline, they put a tag on my luggage that said (FAT), and I’m overweight. I think that’s very rude!”

    After putting him on hold for a minute, while I looked into it. (I was dying laughing). I came back and explained the city code for Fresno, Ca. is (FAT – Fresno Air Terminal), and the airline was just putting a destination tag on his luggage.

    8. A Senator John Kerry aide (Lindsay Ross) called to inquire about a trip package to Hawaii. After going over all the cost info, she asked, ”Would it be cheaper to fly to California and then take the train to Hawaii ?”

    9. I just got off the phone with a freshman Congressman, Bobby Bright from Alabama who asked, “How do I know which plane to get on?”

    I asked him what exactly he meant, to which he replied, ”I was told my flight number is 823, but none of these planes have numbers on them.”

    10. Senator Dianne Feinstein called and said, ”I need to fly to Pepsi-Cola, Florida. Do I have to get on one of those little computer planes?”
    I asked if she meant fly to Pensacola, FL , on a commuter plane.
    She said, ”Yeah, whatever, smarty!”

    11. Mary Landrieu, Louisiana Senator, called and had a question about the documents she needed in order to fly to China. After a lengthy discussion about passports, I reminded her that she needed a visa. “Oh, no I don’t. I’ve been to China many times and never had to have one of those.”

    I double checked and sure enough, her stay required a visa. When I told her this she said, ”Look, I’ve been to China four times and every time they have accepted my American Express!”

    12. A New Jersey Congressman (John Adler) called to make reservations, ”I want to go from Chicago to Rhino, New York.”
    I was at a loss for words. Finally, I said, ”Are you sure that’s the name of the town?”
    “Yes, what flights do you have?” replied the man.
    After some searching, I came back with, ”I’m sorry, sir, I’ve looked up every airport code in the country and can’t find a rhino anywhere..”
    The man retorted, ”Oh, don’t be silly! Everyone knows where it is. Check your map!”
    So I scoured a map of the state of New York and finally offered, ”You don’t mean Buffalo, do you?”
    The reply? ”Whatever! I knew it was a big animal.”

    OMG I’m no longer surprised that the arselifters is pulling your legs (or ours for that matter). Maybe we should all do IQ checks on all politicians?

    • July 6, 2010 at 8:02 pm

      🙂 I’ll bet most of them are Dhimmicrats!

      • July 6, 2010 at 11:15 pm

        They couldn’t tell the difference between a democrat, dhimmicrat or a dumbocrat.

        • July 7, 2010 at 12:17 am

          That’s because there is no difference.

    • Steve Davis
      July 12, 2010 at 2:12 pm

      WHO ARE these people??? Surely they are not in positions of power? If that is the case then poor old Americans are in worse trouble than I thought!

  13. Jacob
    July 6, 2010 at 7:57 pm

    The Muslims are very united when it comes to criticism on their religion. We must fight this unity by unifying our beliefs under one rule! Free the world from unruly Islam!

  14. Colin Gibson
    July 6, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    This is not religion. It is vomit. Islam is bullshit

  15. Jim
    July 8, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    If you watched the three programs on the 4th of July from the Washington Mall, Bostin and Macy’s you had to notice that there wasn’t one woman in a tent or some bushy eyebrowed, bearded, dark complexioned man with one of those stupid ass hats on in the entire crowd!

  16. AmericanMe
    July 16, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    That sow just makes me physically ill. Can you imagine being forced to see your daughter imprisoned in cloth like that brainwashed and advocating her own debasement and enslavement?

  17. Arthur
    August 18, 2010 at 3:09 am

    Those whores of islam are brainwashed from birth. the only cure is execution!!!

  18. December 2, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you simply shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  19. October 4, 2015 at 3:36 am

    It’s in fact very difficult in this full of activity life to listen news on TV,
    therefore I simply use the web for that reason, and take the
    newest information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *