ACT!’s B. Gabriel: Muslims can be Loyal, Patriotic Americans

Yes friends, you read it correctly!

(Click on image to enlarge)

ACT! Loyal Muslim Americans
Brigette Gabriel:

There are certainly many patriotic Muslims who have served, or are currently serving, in our armed forces. One such example is Zuhdi Jasser, who served our country honorably and now speaks publicly against Jihadists – at extreme risk to his own life as well as to the lives of his family.

(Note: This article is not directed at the great ACT! foot soldiers. It is directed at the upper echelon of ACT!)

The woman I had dubbed the “Queen of False Hope”, has completely crossed the line now. As if $elling America the fantasy that “moderate” Muslims are going to save the day was not bad enough, she is now just flat out lying to America. Because one cannot be loyal to the Koran and the US Constitution at the same time, and I believe she is fully aware of that. The reason being is that, Islam and the US Constitution clearly contradict.

The US Constitution grants freedom of religion.

First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Islam does not grant the same equality.

Koran verse 9:29 (Altafsir)

{ قَاتِلُواْ ٱلَّذِينَ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَلاَ بِٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلآخِرِ وَلاَ يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ وَلاَ يَدِينُونَ دِينَ ٱلْحَقِّ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ ٱلْكِتَابَ حَتَّىٰ يُعْطُواْ ٱلْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَاغِرُونَ }

Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam.

The 8th Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

Eight Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

While the Koran promotes such punishments.

Koran verse 5:38

{ وَٱلسَّارِقُ وَٱلسَّارِقَةُ فَٱقْطَعُوۤاْ أَيْدِيَهُمَا جَزَآءً بِمَا كَسَبَا نَكَالاً مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَٱللَّهُ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ }

And the thieving male and the thieving female (the definite article in both [nouns] relates to the subject [sc. wa’lladhī saraqa wa’llatī saraqat, ‘And the male who thieves and the female who thieves’]; because this [clause] resembles a conditional statement [sc. ‘if he thieves, if she thieves’ etc.] the fā’ has been included in the predicate [fa’qta‘ū, ‘then cut off’]) cut off their hands, that is, the right hand of each of the two from the wristbone; it is explained in the Sunna that the amputation applies to [the stealing of] a quarter of a dinar and upwards, and if the person were to re-offend, the left foot should then be amputated from the ankle, and then [on subsequent re-offending] the left hand [is amputated], followed by the right foot, after which discretionary punishment is applied; as a requital (jazā’an is in the accusative because it is a verbal noun) for what they have earned, and an exemplary punishment, for both of them, from God; God is Mighty, His way will prevail, Wise, in His creation.

The 13th Amendment abolished slavery in the United States.

Thirteenth Amendment: Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Meanwhile Islam clearly advocates slavery. Even sex slavery!

Koran verse 4:24

{ وَٱلْمُحْصَنَٰتُ مِنَ ٱلنِّسَآءِ إِلاَّ مَا مَلَكْتَ أَيْمَٰنُكُمْ كِتَٰبَ ٱللَّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ وَأُحِلَّ لَكُمْ مَّا وَرَاءَ ذَٰلِكُمْ أَن تَبْتَغُواْ بِأَمْوَٰلِكُمْ مُّحْصِنِينَ غَيْرَ مُسَٰفِحِينَ فَمَا ٱسْتَمْتَعْتُمْ بِهِ مِنْهُنَّ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ فَرِيضَةً وَلاَ جُنَاحَ عَلَيْكُمْ فِيمَا تَرَٰضَيْتُمْ بِهِ مِن بَعْدِ ٱلْفَرِيضَةِ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيماً حَكِيماً }

And, forbidden to you are, wedded women, those with spouses, that you should marry them before they have left their spouses, be they Muslim free women or not; save what your right hands own, of captured [slave] girls, whom you may have sexual intercourse with, even if they should have spouses among the enemy camp, but only after they have been absolved of the possibility of pregnancy [after the completion of one menstrual cycle]; this is what God has prescribed for you (kitāba is in the accusative because it is the verbal noun). Lawful for you (read passive wa-uhilla, or active wa-ahalla), beyond all that, that is, except what He has forbidden you of women, is that you seek, women, using your wealth, by way of a dowry or a price, in wedlock and not, fornicating, in illicitly. Such wives as you enjoy thereby, and have had sexual intercourse with, give them their wages, the dowries that you have assigned them, as an obligation; you are not at fault in agreeing together, you and they, after the obligation, is waived, decreased or increased. God is ever Knowing, of His creatures, Wise, in what He has ordained for them.

I could easily come up with more examples, but will stop there in an effort not to make this article too long.

Maybe Brigitte or one of her henchmen would like to explain how one can be loyal to both the US Constitution and the Koran? If they do respond they need to bear in mind that to deny even one verse of the Koran, is to apostate from Islam.

From the Reliance of the Traveller, Apostasy from Islam (Ridda). p597

ACTS THAT ENTAIL LEAVING ISLAM

(7) to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it;

Also bear in mind that Jew-hating Imam Syed Soharwardy, claimed the US Constitution and the Koran are in sink. Was he correct ACT!?

So not only does the upper echelon of ACT! support Muslim immigration….err…..the Muslim invasion, they are supporting Muslims in America. As if the result of Muslims in America is going to be any different from the result of Muslims in the UK.

To add insult to injury Gabriel claims she was born in Lebanon, and her town was overrun by Muslims. If that is true, why would she even begin to support Muslims and Muslim immigration? If we do not end Muslim immigration it is just a matter of time until we lose this war.

At this point I have to ask. Is it all about the Benjamin’s?

images (5)

 

Comments

comments

26 comments for “ACT!’s B. Gabriel: Muslims can be Loyal, Patriotic Americans

  1. April 13, 2014 at 8:17 am

    You nailed it, Christopher! I do wish she would explain in depth her position. Enough that CAIR will reach out to her, putting duress back into play. The US Constitution exists to resist Sharia, and Islam does not exist without that brutal promise of misery.

  2. Kaliko
    April 16, 2014 at 3:06 pm

    Well all these passages are reflected in the Bible also, so by your logic one cannot be a devout Christian and patriotic

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 3:22 pm

      The Bible is stories of those times, and Christians are not on a worldwide campaign attempting to turn back the clock to then. So by logic, your comment is pointless.

      • Kaliko
        April 16, 2014 at 4:10 pm

        So you do not deny that the bible contains all the same laws that the Koran does. The same laws that you use to justify your hate and anger towards Islam.

        • admin
          April 16, 2014 at 5:03 pm

          The Koran calls for Muslims to dominate Christianity. Obviously the Bible does not say that. Why should I like or respect Islam?

          • Kaliko
            April 16, 2014 at 5:39 pm

            Well once again you are not answering my question and the bible does call for the killing of non- believers just as any Abrahamic religion. So all the points in your argument against Islam can be used against Christianity, how weird?

          • admin
            April 16, 2014 at 5:42 pm

            I sure did answer it, and you might want to read up on the 10 Commandments. Also Christians are not on a worldwide jihad. Muslims are. Your attempt to get the focus off of Islam fails. You are a terrible conman. A failure to Allah.

  3. Kaliko
    April 16, 2014 at 6:00 pm

    Ok I get it. You are angry because you feel Christians reign over the world is slipping. I’m sure you are familiar with the massive numbers of deaths caused by Christian conquest and the countless other atrocities committed by them and this is by no means a tactic to turn the hate onto Christians just reminding you that every religion has a history of violence. To address your statement asserting Muslims are on a worldwide jihad, they are they must constantly defend their beliefs against those like you and does Christianity not promote the spread of their beliefs. Once again my question has not been answered. I thought you might have valuable insight to provide but it seems you don’t

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 6:03 pm

      Nothing that happened in past history is going to accept Islam today. That con fails as well, and I answered your question twice. Anyone can see you ducked my comment about the 10 Commandments. You are not nearly as slick as you think you are.
      http://www.10-commandments.org/

      People like me are people who do not want to be dominated by Islam. So save the usual self-centered Muslim victim card.

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 6:04 pm

      You childishly try to discredit me, but turned coward when I challenged you to a debate on Islam. That says it all….

  4. Kaliko
    April 16, 2014 at 6:19 pm

    Where did you challenge me to a debate on Islam, your comment on the 10 commandments has no meaning in this conversation you said read up on it. What is there to duck when you just say you should read up on the 10 commandments. You sir are the one ducking questions and shifting focus onto another subject I am not trying to convert you to Islam I am not even Muslim. I did not turn coward and dodge a QUESTION in this whole conversation. So once again in there not a parallel to scriptures in the bible and scriptures in the Koran? if so can’t all the points you make against Islam be made against Christianity?

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 6:30 pm

      1. OK, so it was a Muslim con artist on Twitter.
      2. Lol! Obviously the 10 Commandments have meaning. What a ridiculous statement.
      3. I responded to your last question more than once. If you do not like the answer that is on you.

  5. kaliko
    April 16, 2014 at 7:18 pm

    You can really twist words, I didn’t say the 10 commandments didn’t have meaning I said they have no meaning in this conversation and by that I mean they have no meaning as a reply to the statement I made on the parallel between Christianity and Islam. And you did not fully respond to my questions which now is rhetorical because my statement is a fact. You still seem to be ducking all of my statements on the negative impact that Christianity has made while I have responded to all of your questions

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 7:21 pm

      It has no meaning in this conversation because you want to ignore them. I responded the way I wanted to. You do not dictate how I respond, and Christianity is not the issue. But thanks for continually proving my point on why you are here. If you have nothing else to say but that, we are done here.

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 7:25 pm

      The Crusades were the result of 100’s of years of Muslim aggression, and Christianity was not the reason your country was annexed.

      http://www.ushistory.org/us/44b.asp

      As I said, you are just a pointless distraction from a serious issue.

    • admin
      April 16, 2014 at 7:28 pm

      Fact is that Jesus did not rape, enslave, and plunder. Mohammad did.

  6. kaliko
    April 16, 2014 at 7:37 pm

    Hatemongers like you are

    • admin
      April 17, 2014 at 9:58 am

      Mohammad was the hate-monger. Here you are supporting him. You are either a Muslim or a coward. Either way you are part of the problem.

  7. Kaliko
    April 17, 2014 at 11:32 am

    I’m the coward because I’m the one deleting others peoples comments to make myself look better

    • admin
      April 17, 2014 at 3:27 pm

      You are a coward because you do not speak out against the threat of Islam, you are also a waste of my time. I will NOT continue to go around in circles with you. Got it now? THE END. #WaronIslam

  8. Kaliko
    April 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm

    It must be nice deleting all my comments to try and discredit me

    • admin
      April 17, 2014 at 3:25 pm

      I deleted some not all (anyone can see that you are just a liar now, and a bad one at that), of the last few because I heard what you had to say. You just continued to repeat yourself, and I am not going to continue to repeat myself over and over to you. As I already exposed the fact you are here to protect Islam. Nothing else needs to be known. Have fun obsessing over me. I know you will!

  9. Abdul Ameer
    May 23, 2014 at 11:45 am

    You do Brigitte Gabriel an injustice. In her first book, Because They Hate, written back in 2006, she wrote: “Islamic terrorists the world over, whom we characterize as fanatic, are really just very devout followers of Muhammad. They are following his example and doing exactly what the Koran teaches…”

    When she says that Moslems “can be” loyal Americans, she is talking about Moslems as people, not about Islam as a body of doctrines. Moslems, like followers of other religions, can be observant or non-observant, practicing or non-practicing. The non-observant Moslems, the non-practicing Moslems can be loyal Americans precisely because the do not follow the Islamic jihadist doctrines.

    We need to distinguish between Islam as a belief system and Moslems, as people who may or may not follow the doctrines.

    • admin
      May 23, 2014 at 12:34 pm

      Hi, no offense but the woman has been saying things like Islamism and radical Islam to the media for years. She also $ells America a feel good fantasy that “moderate” Muslims are going to save the day. While supporting Jasser who clearly misleads the public on Islam.

      As for the rest, sorry, I am not interested in trying to sort out the “good” Muslims from the bad. It is a recipe for disaster that helps keep Islam alive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *