Direct Descendant of the Family of Mohammad to Speak on Muslim Day 2010 at Canada’s Wonderland

How long are non-Islamic countries going to continue and lie to themselves, about our Muslim communities? They are are not here to assimilate, they are here to unite and takeover. Examples of them uniting can be seen in Australia, California, California again, and Cali again. Other areas being Chicago, Florida, Italy, Scandinavia, and the UK. Now lets take it to Canada.

Hat tip to Jeffrey.

One of the guests of this event is Islamic scholar Shaykh Muhammad bin Yahya Al-Husaini Al-Ninowy, who is a direct descendant of the family of Mohammad. In this video he states that Mohammad the lying, rapist, warmonger, control freak, is a great personality, a beauty that shined on this world. Enough said.

This is photo from a past Muslim Day event.

This event is taking place on July 18Th. Please get in touch with Wonderland, and embrace them with some “Logan Love”. Their contact information, can be found HERE.

Link to Article



31 comments for “Direct Descendant of the Family of Mohammad to Speak on Muslim Day 2010 at Canada’s Wonderland

  1. June 17, 2010 at 2:10 am

    I can’t help but notice it says direct descendant of the family of Mahound rather than a direct descendant of Mahound.

  2. Iain UK
    June 17, 2010 at 6:54 am

    Are you sure that photo is really from a past muzzy day. It looks more like the waiting room at the local benefits office down the road from me. Where’s the segregation.

  3. aerialcat
    June 17, 2010 at 7:59 am

    Someone should suggest DNA verification and watch them twitch.

    • June 17, 2010 at 8:10 am

      LOL! They’d have to dig up Mahound’s rotten corpse in Medina to compare against it.

      And, while they’re at it, they can dig up Aisha’s too to confirm how old she was when she died.

  4. Rose
    June 17, 2010 at 1:52 pm

    CL: It’s just simply unbelievable. We are just planting our heads in sand. Maybe some are just hoping they will go away. In Norway there is anti-religious “hate” speech laws that make it illegal to say anything, anything about Islam. Like Geert is being tried in the Netherlands, so too may Bruce Bawer be in Norway.

    I feel as though I am am living a surreal existence. And what you said about leftists supporting these animals, not withstanding the one leftist who said he hates Islam, is dead on.

    I’m getting weary, CL.

    • admin
      June 17, 2010 at 6:13 pm

      It is unbelievable that we would allow so much freedom to the ideology of the enemy. But have been getting some good news, like Louisiana banning Sharia, and it looks like OK will be next.

      Hang in there Rose!

  5. June 17, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    Did you ever wonder why authentic Muslims are wild, cruel, warmongers? Allow me to give you a hint by quoting Satan’s Bible, nicknamed the Qur’an:

    “Oh you who believe, retaliation is prescribed for in the matter of the slain; the free for the free, and the slave for the slave, and female for the female, but if any remission is made to any one by (aggrieved) brother, then persecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner….”(Surah 2:179).

    “And fight the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits,”(Surah 2:190).

    “And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers,”(Surah 2:191).

    “And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors,”(Surah 2:193).

    “Fighting is enjoined on you, and it is an object of dislike to you, and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you and Allah knows, while you do not know,”(Surah 2;216).

    “And fight in the way of Allah, and know that Allah is Hearing, Knowing,:(Surah 2:244).

    “And when you go forth early in the morning form your family to lodge the believers in encampments for war and Allah is Hearing, Knowing,”(Surah 3:121).

    “And if you are slain in the way of Allah, or you die, certainly forgiveness from Allah and mercy is better than what they amass,”(Surah 3:157).

    “And if indeed you die or you are slain, certainly to Allah you shall be gathered together,”(Surah 3:158).

    “Those who said of their brethren whilst they (themselves) held back: Had they obeyed us they would not have been killed,”(Surah 3:168).

    “Therefore let those fight in the way of Allah, who sell this world’s life for hereafer; and whoever fights in the way of Allah, then he be slain or he be victorious. We shall grant him a mighty reward,” (Surah 4:74).

    Comment: Can anyone imagine Jesus Christ talking like that? Nowhere did Jesus command violence to one’s neighbor. Instead Jesus said: “Do good to those who persecute you.” “Love your neighbor.” “Feed the hungry.” “Clothe the naked.” “Cure the sick.” “Obey the (ten) commanments.” That’s a far cry from the cruelty, violence, and wickedness of Islamism.

    P.S. More from Satan’s Bible, nicknamed the Qur’an, is forthcoming tomorrow or the day after. Thanks.

    • admin
      June 17, 2010 at 6:10 pm

      Welcome to the site!

    • June 18, 2010 at 1:31 pm

      Pislam is a death cult,it’s as simple as that.

    • June 18, 2010 at 2:51 pm

      thanks angelgringo for such a great list. i’ve collected pertinent well written comments on Islam and yours just made my list! I also believe Islam is satans religion. You may enjoy this free 295 page pdf downloadable book by Sujit Das:
      Unmasking Muhammed: The Malignant Narcissist and his Grand Delusion Allah

      • March 30, 2012 at 11:10 pm

        Exposing Sujit Das and His Blasphemous book against the Prophet of Islam (PBUH).
        Fasihuddin (PSP) in his coloumn Sujit Das ke Napak Harzasarai (Sujit Das’s unholy rubbish) published in Daily Aaj, Peshawar on Friday, March 30th, 2012, has critically evaluated the blasphemous book of Sujit Das (Bombay, India), and has beautifully exposed his venomous character, virulent fallacies, poisonous derivations and out of context narrations and self-styled explanations of many basic and authentic facts about the Holy Prophet of Islam (Peace Be Upon Him). Fasihuddin says that it is a very common propaganda technique of non-muslims or pseudo free-thinkers of the muslim world in the modern days to malign Islam, its Holy Book and the Messenger of Allah, Hazrat Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), for their petty worldly gains, cheap popularity and ulterior personal motives like cash, publicity, visas, asylum, etc in the western world. The beguiled commentators and perverted writers feel joyous over triggering violent responses from the simple, uneducated and honest muslim society. Resultantly, these pseudo free-thinkers further capitalize on such uncontrollable demonstrations and a vicious circle of radicalization starts moving round and round. This is how the vested interests further their sinister motives and ensure their mundane gains by creating more and more cleavages in the west and the muslim world and widening the gap already existing between the two. Fasihuddin has clearly identified the basic flaws and incoherence in the highly provocative account of Sujit Das, the Dirty (as he names him for Sujit feels no compunctions in uttering very low, mean and base words for the most sacred and holy personality of Islam and all religions, the Prophet Muhammad, Peace Be Upon Him). The writer in a cool, passionate way advises the muslims not to over-react to such blasphemous writings in shape of violent processions, instead they should try to tackle them in an analytical, critical and academic way, and expose their hidden meanness, intellectual dishonesty and superficial understanding of the true and sophisticated Islamic code of beliefs and the essence of its legal system. This superficiality, coupled with malicious ignorance, dishonesty of intention and personal greed, results in such undesirable, un-warranted and baseless products as that of Sujit Das, the Cursed (only a cursed person can use an abusive language against the holy personalities and prophets). Look at the name of his book: “Unmasking Muhammad, the Malignant Narcissist and His Grand Delusion Allah”. When the title is so malignant and full of venom and hatred, then what one can expect of its contents to be judged on a scholarly and value-free touchstone. Fasihuddin points at a very important fact about some other religions by quoting the Noble Prize Winner poet Rabindranath Tagore who said, in 1924, that “the real cause of the failure of Brihmo Samaj was that it lacked a dynamic personality and a practical demonstration behind it”. Islam has a very practical personality behind its teachings and tenets in the shape of its Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). Lets see a few fallacies in the account of Sujid Das’ blasphemous account:
        1. Sujit says, “Anyone who claims to be a prophet must be prepared to have his prophesy tested”. Fasihuddin says: “Didn’t the Prophet of Mercy prove his claim in front of his diehard opponents when he announced his prophethood? Why people believed in him then, and why more than 1.3 billion people even today can offer their lives for his respect, dignity and prophethood? Were those people mad and lunatics then, and are crazy today? What is Sujit’s standards for testing and what is its authenticity, validity and universality?
        2. Sujit Says: “There are enough pious and totally un-objective traditions of Muhammad preserved by the Muslim religious community, but what is lacking in these sources is honesty”: Fasihiuddin says: “What about the writings of hundreds of orientalist scholars like AR Nicholson, A R Gibb, TW Arnold, Prof. Phillip K. Hitti, Prof. Montgomery Watt, and many more who wrote very high sounding words in praise of the Holy Prophet and the Holy Book? What is Sujit’s criteria for honesty? How can he prove the content and quantity of ‘honesty’ in his own blasphemous book? Lets see his “honesty”. Sujit quotes different rivals of Islam, even of the early muslim era, the opponents in Mecca and Madina at the time of Prophet’s advent, and Sujit firmly believes in all such false accusations with no “testing of honesty” and pretends to have the power of describing all such chronic animosities as a true account! Sujit, like many others, are not ignorant of the fact that even the worst enemies of the Holy Prophet (PBHM) used to call him Sadiq (the truthful) and Ameen (the trustworthy), and they used to keep with him their belongings in case of long absence from the village. History is full of such testimony.
        3. Sujit casts his sinister aspersions on the first revelation as: “This Divine confrontation was less heavenly and more demonic”. An encounter which happened in a cave for the first time, and unexpectedly, and surely having its awesome spiritual effects, and which later proved to be the starting point of the complete revelation is ‘less heavenly’ and ‘more demonic’ in Sujit’s account. How he differentiates between the spiritual and demonic aspect of an event? With what authority and standard he can say and measure the two portion of being less and more in one event? A man who has no experience in a heavenly incidence or in a spiritual encounter, how can he realize one from the other?
        4. Sujit Says: “Muhammad gave no solid proof of his prophethood. He simply claimed to the title of Prophet of Allah….How can we be sure that Muhammad didn’t lie?” Fasihuddin says that what is the criteria of a solid proof? When people asked him for proof, didn’t Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) present anything? Was he not tested by the excellent and wise brains of his time? Didn’t they test him for more than 23 years of his Prophethood? Were all those believers dump and dupe? Sujit has shown utter ignorance and childish reasoning for proving a case on empirical basis or historical and verifiable proofs. How can we be sure that Sujit is not lying?
        5. About the Prophet’s Companions Sujit says with brazen face: “Those early companions of Muhammad not only lost their property and self-respect but the lives of their children, relatives, even their own lives. At the end of the day they returned with empty hands, disappointed and disillusioned. All of them were pathetic losers. Almost all of them died a dog’s death” (Page 208). For the rebuttal and denial of Sujit, the Cursed, this one note is enough. Who doesn’t know that what was the socio-political conditions of pre-Islamic and pagan Arabia and what made them rulers, scholars, writers, scientists, linguistic experts, administrators, military and political leaders and conquerors? Even the virulent account of the most prejudiced of the orienlatists have admired this humanizing and civilizational force of Islam and its Messenger, the Holy Prophet (PBUH) despite the fact that they don’t accept of Islam, and Sujit, the Cursed, has not an idea of any of such marvelous achievements of the Companions and their followers in the initial centuries of Islam. Fasihuddin has advised the muslims to read authentic scholars on Islam and teach their children the true muslim literature in the current age of anti-Islamic propaganda. He also advises the west not to allow, propagate or protect such sinister and malicious writings and their authors as it damages the efforts of inter-faith dialogue and a joint struggle for solving the problems of humanity and reducing its sufferings.
        6. While quoting the great Poet Allama Iqbal that the muslims are in a poor conditions due to their ignorance of the Quran and not properly following the Prophet (PBUH), Sujit says: “If Iqbal is true, then how the infidels have prospered? We, the non-muslims don’t practice Islam at all. In fact some of us even oppose Islam. Then how the infidel countries are better than Muslim countries that at least practice a bit? If the Quran is full of science, then why the Islamic countries are most backward?”
        Sujit’s account and analogy is full of his superficial knowledge about Islam, Quran, human civilization and the Rise and Fall of dynasties and empires. Iqbal’s poetic expression is not untrue when he says that the early muslims felt and understood the right meaning and message of the Holy Book and became the rulers of the major part of the world of that time. Iqbal has done a copious poetry and he clearly identifies the importance of science and technology for human progress and political dominance. His one part explains the other and shall not be read out of context. Quran is not a book of science but a book of guidance, salvation, enlightenment, moral purification and high ethics and accepted norms for leading a peaceful and productive life. Quran mentions certain guidelines to explore the hidden human faculties and natural resources and exhorts to unearth the forces and energies in the universe, by inviting the human intellect to think about the potential dividends in the globe and universe for further creation and betterment of human life. Quran doesn’t provide scientific formulae but a scientific outlook and sets on triggering a creative vision and analytical thinking in an able-minded person. Sujit’s poor knowledge is full of misleading misgivings about Islam and Quran. Unfortunately, the tender, unaware and easily impressionable minds of the young muslims are unnecessarily polluted and a dis-trust is created amongst the various communities of the world by these atheists and ‘employed’ writers like Sujit Das and others. Not only the muslims but also the true academics of other religions should disown and ignore these rubbish and blasphemous writings.
        Corrigendum: In the original coloumn a saying of Tabari is quoted. This is not from Sujit’s book but from another atheist and blasphemous writer, Abdul Kasem (Bengali) who too has written enormous baseless, superficial and extremely un-warranted things about the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the Quran, in the name of free-speech and research, whereas his account of ‘Contradictions in the Quran’ or ‘Muhammad Violated the Quran’ are full of fallacies, inaccuracies, out of context explanations and twisting meanings—all indicative of his poor knowledge of the Quaran, Arabic and Islamic teachings. Never in the history, even the diehard anti-Islam orientalists in the past had leveled such abusive, immoral, irrational and unreasonable charges against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as has been done in this malignant book of Sujit Das, the Cursed. Fasihuddin’s next coloumn will be exposing the lopsided accounts of Abdul Kasem Bangali.
        Contact: The article can be found on
        (Fasihuddin (PSP) is the President of Pakistan Society of Criminology and can be reached at

        • admin
          March 31, 2012 at 11:44 am

          I highly doubt those are your words. How about you stop being an Islamobot, and come back and debate me on the actions of your perverted prophet?

        • Michael C
          April 1, 2012 at 1:27 am

          Sujit Das`s book can be downloaded free

          There are no “petty worldly gains or “cash” for Sujit Das there.

          Quote: “Islam has a very practical personality behind its teachings…”.

          Yes, tying an old woman between two camels and then ripping her in half – very practical.

          Cutting off the heads of 600 captives, or some say 900 – very practical.

          Cutting men`s feet and hands off, spiking their eyes out with a hot brand, and leaving them on hot rocks without water to die – very practical.

          Mohammed said “If anyone discards his Islamic religion, kill him” – very practical.

          Quote: “more than 1.3 billion people even today can offer their lives for his respect, dignity and prophethood”: maybe so, and maybe that “very practical” penalty has an influence.

          Mohammed authorised his followers to lie and deceive – very practical.

          Mohammed authorised his followers to rape captive women – very practical.

          Mohammed consummated marriage with a nine-year-old – very practical.

          Quote: “Was he not tested by the excellent and wise brains of his time?”
          Yes, and what did they say ?
          “Indeed, he is mad” Koran 68:51

          Mohammed made a prophecy: he prophesied that Islam would split into 73 sects, and that 72 of them would go to hell. That makes him a prophet.

          Plenty more where those came from.

  6. Furor Teutonicus
    June 18, 2010 at 3:03 am

    XX Muslim Day 2010 at Canada’s WONDERLAND XX

    I presume the muslims don’t “do” irony then?

    Probably think it is something mummy does with their shirty.

  7. June 18, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    they will keep lying to themselves as long as the Media has them convinced Islam is a peaceful religion, and then when islam shows it’s true colors, we Christians begin sweeping house, and ridding it of the Garbage we allowed to collect

    • arliss
      June 18, 2010 at 7:02 pm

      except that we’re not allowed to “sweep house” as you say and stay true to our religion.

      • June 18, 2010 at 8:14 pm

        Actually, we can. The Popes, once they reacted, had no problem directing Christians to fight against satan’s minions.

    • admin
      June 19, 2010 at 2:55 am

      The media in Europe, protects Islam as well.

  8. June 19, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    I still have probs with postings disappearing into the wordpress twilight zone. 🙁

    • admin
      June 19, 2010 at 9:39 pm

      Sorry about that. 🙂

  9. Kelly
    June 19, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    As a Canadian, I am sickened by this. The introduction of “multiculturalism” was a HUGE mistake.

    • admin
      June 19, 2010 at 9:38 pm

      All we have to do is look at the UK to see how “multiculturalism” with Muslims, is destroying Western Civilization. We should of learned from their mistakes.

  10. Tye
    June 20, 2010 at 1:05 am

    multiculturalism is fine so long as you present and stand by clear limits. limits such as:

    we will not have sharia
    we will not support or condone honor killings
    free speech means that everyone has the right to be insulted and we will not back down on this
    it is not ok to fully conceal your woman as this is a form of slavery

    if all these are made clear and upheld then multiculturalism is fine. it’s when governments back down that it becomes a problem

    • admin
      June 20, 2010 at 1:09 am

      I understand your point, but they would still build up their Sharia enclaves, and the trouble would escalate from there. We need to end all Muslim immigration.

      Welcome to the site Tye!

    • eib
      October 20, 2011 at 4:40 pm

      Much of what Muslims are calling “insulting” involves fair comments and criticism.
      For instance, if I say that Jesus is the Son of God, the Christ …
      And then I say that Muslims deny Christ, that’s interpreted as an insult.
      All three are statements of doctrinal fact.
      They are dogma to me, and beyond question.
      If I say that 19 Muslim terrorists crashed jets into the World Trade Center Towers, the Pentagon and Shanksville, PA, these statements of actual fact are also called insulting by Muslims.
      When statements of fact become insults, the society, if fearful, turns its back on reason.
      This is what’s at stake in the confrontation with Islam.

  11. October 20, 2011 at 10:39 am

    I do not even know the way I ended up here, but I assumed this post was once great. I do not realize who you might be but definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger in the event you are not already 😉 Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *