Pedophilia Protecting Ahmadi Muslim Plays the Victim Card

untitled (42)After showing up to defend his defense of Islam inspired child marriage, (in the comment section), East Coast Muslim Umair Malik has done the predictable. He has played the usual pathetic Muslim victim card.

Admadhi whines(Click on image to enlarge.)

Yes, I did say that, and I used his words against him. For his depraved views he should be locked up and if possible deported. America has enough of her own problems. We do not need people like him adding to them.

To make matters worse, in his mind it is “Islamophobia” to care about the well-being of children.

Whine away Islamobot….whine away….

US: Ahmadi Muslim Tries to Cover for Islam Inspired Child Marriage!

BoSfH1HCUAIGfxDOver the years I have been told that Ahmadi Muslims are different, and nonthreatening. Which of course I did not agree with, because NO Muslim will condemn any Koranic verse. To further prove my point I am providing screenshots of a recent Twitter conversation I had with an Ahmadi who dwells on the East Coast of America.

(Click on images to enlarge.)

Admadhi Boston profile

During our conversation he implied my sources were wrong, and supplied a Koran from the “Official Website of Ahmadiyyi Community”. (http: //www.alislam.org/)

In it I went to verse 65:5 (Usually 65:4 in most sources) and to no surprise at all it said the same thing as the one I had posted. Did he even read what he had sent me?

Admadhi Boston 1

Admadhi Boston 2

For those who do not know Sura (chapter 65) is entitled Al-Talaaq (Divorce), and the verse is describing the waiting period a divorced female has to wait before remarrying. (Iddah)

The words “and the same is for such as do not have their monthly courses yet, clearly shows that Islam allows prepubescent females to be married, AKA as child marriage, AKA pedophilia.

When I confronted my new ‘friend” with the verse from his source, he turned into an Islamic spin doctor. A poor one at that!

Admadhi Boston his verse against him

Admadhi Boston 3

He will not condemn the verses.

Admadhi Boston 4

Nothing in there about child marriage.

Admadhi Boston 5

This is not a call for violence, but are these pedophile protecting Disciples of Satan really what we want in our great country? It is past time America ends all Muslim immigration.

 

In Search of Real Islam ~ the UK’s Mehdi Hassan Unmasked

images (17)When I was on The Last Stand Radio Show the other night, I had said one of the things we as non-Muslims needed to do is become more assertive and challenge Muslim propagandists head-on. We just cannot allow their deception to go unchallenged. Today we see another example of this from our mate and guest blogger, The London Humanist. (www. LondonHumanist.com)

Responding to Mehdi Hasan

Whether Islam as an ideology has anything to do with young British Muslims becoming jihadis is, surprisingly, still a hotly debated topic. Despite jihadis telling us in no obscure terms that it is their very religious beliefs that motivate their actions, some public figures, including US President Barack Obama, beg to disagree.

The amount of intellectual dishonesty that goes into the effort to disconnect Islamic terrorism from Islam is insurmountable. Mehdi Hasan, a political editor of Huffington Post UK and a presenter on Al Jazeera, is at the forefront of this movement in the UK. Sadly, he uses a prominent online publication as his pulpit and takes full advantage of Huffington Post’s reputation and reach to spread his views.

A recent article by Mehdi Hasan is titled “What the Jihadists Who Bought ‘Islam For Dummies’ on Amazon Tell Us About Radicalisation”. There, Mr. Hasan tries to argue that “the 1,400-year-old Islamic faith has little to do with the modern jihadist movement”.

Islam for Dummies

Arguments and refutations

Mehdi spends the first half of the article developing an argument that jihadis are, supposedly, not devout Muslims. Jihadis are, it turns out, religious novices; they lack religious literacy and are light on practice. Hence, by extension, their actions cannot be driven by religion.

The core fallacy of this argument is that it is trying to refute an allegation that does not exist. Nobody claims that breadth of Qur’anic knowledge or the number of memorized hadith is in any way associated with extremist behavior. All that’s needed to cause violent religious zealotry is belief in the supernatural and a few “divine dispensations” that provide guidance on how exactly to treat unbelievers.

And this is exactly what we see.

When jihadis hit Twitter to post pictures of beheaded enemies, they don’t tend to quote “Koran for Dummies”. Instead, they quote from the very heart of Islamic sacred texts that are taught around the world in mosques, Islamic schools and universities. They live and, most importantly, die by these texts. Here are some examples.

Forced conversion to Islam

*Dhul-l–Khulasa was a house in Yemen belonging to the tribe of Khatham and Bajaila, and in it there were idols which were worshipped, and it was called Al-Ka’ba.” Jarir went there, burnt it with fire and dismantled it. When Jarir reached Yemen, there was a man who used to foretell and give good omens by casting arrows of divination. Someone said to him. “The messenger of Allah’s Apostle is present here and if he should get hold of you, he would chop off your neck.” One day while he was using them (i.e. arrows of divination), Jarir stopped there and said to him, “Break them (i.e. the arrows) and **testify that None has the right to be worshipped except Allah, or else I will chop off your neck.”** So the man broke those arrows and testified that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah. Then Jarir sent a man called Abu Artata from the tribe of Ahmas to the Prophet to convey the good news (of destroying Dhu-l-Khalasa). So when the messenger reached the Prophet, he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! By Him Who sent you with the Truth, I did not leave it till it was like a scabby camel.” Then the Prophet blessed the horses of Ahmas and their men five times.* **(Bukhari 5:59:643)**

*It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.* **(Muslim 1:30)**

Fighting Unbelievers

*The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom.* **(Qur’an 5:33)**

*Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.* **(Muslim 41:6985, 41:6981, 41:6982, 41:6983, 41:6984)**

Inspiring hatred towards other religions

*Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: Ikrimah reported on the authority of Ibn Abbas, saying: I think the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) said: When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer, but it will suffice if they pass in front of him at a distance of over a stone’s throw.* **(Abu Dawud 2:704)**

The second part of the article tries to suggest that jihadis got their religion all wrong. Mehdi claims that extremists are fed a “perverted, politicized version of Islam”, and its function is limited to being an “emotional vehicle” to articulate anger. This echoes a similar claim, often heard from Western politicians (usually Left-wing Liberals) that jihadis are not real Muslims and do not represent any religion.

No compulsion in religion

This line of argument is flawed in multiple ways.

First, it is certainly not up to us to tell jihadis what their identities really are. Every single ISIS fighter identifies himself as a Muslim, and I see no credible reason to discount or ignore their statements of faith. Besides, it is the very statement of faith, pronounced publicly in Arabic, that makes someone a new Muslim in the eyes of the religious community.

Second, Islamic texts are politicized by nature. Qur’an and volumes of Hadith meticulously deal with all aspects of character, conduct and governance that human beings are expected to uphold on Earth. Detailed divine dispensations are given on topics ranging from the right ways to have sex with one’s spouse to how to govern, how to enter treaties with other states, and how to run finances of an Islamic State.

Third, history confirms the politicized nature of Islamic doctrines. A massive military expansion of the first Islamic State – the Noble Caliphate – that conquered Persia, Byzantine, Anatolia and the whole of North Africa, was executed under the banner of war against apostasy. Here, Islamic principles served as an ideological fuel for an aggressive economic and political war – full of beheadings and similar atrocities.

Finally, there is no such thing as one real Islam. An ideology is formed on the basis of source material and interpretations. In case of Islam, the source material – the sacred texts of Qur’an and Hadith – is incredibly complex and highly polarizing. Islamic teachings developed in history covering periods of relative peace as well as brutalities and war. The verses that we find in the sacred texts reflect this polarization.

Here are some examples.

No compulsion in religion

This verse was supposedly revealed to Muhammad when Muslims were a heavily prosecuted Meccan minority.

*There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.* **(Qur’an 2:256)**

Islam is compulsory

When Muslims became a majority, this verse was “revealed”.

*Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.* **(Qur’an 9:29)**

It is the sheer amount of religious text, which is filled with contradictions like these, that necessitates the existence of Islamic scholarly class. Self-taight or laden with degrees from Islamic universities, they are meant to spend their lives working out the will of God and translating it – in plain Arabic – to the less learned community of believers. But even here contradictions occur. It turns out that neither classic nor contemporary Islamic scholars always agree.

Here are some examples of how different scholars approached religious subjugation in Islam.

A prominent Saudi Cleric on Qur’an 9:29

*The kuffaar should be compelled to enter Islam if they are not people from whom the jizyah may be taken, because that will lead to their happiness and salvation in this world and in the Hereafter. Obliging a person to adhere to the truth in which is guidance and happiness is better for him than falsehood.* **[(source)](http ://islamqa.info/en/34770)**

A prominent North American cleric on Qur’an 9:29

*…all the early Meccan verses of peace and forbearance with respect to non-Muslims remain in effect and are not abrogated with respect to all peoples other than the Arab polytheists. And with respect to all the later verses commanding Muslims to fight the polytheists, they abrogate the early verses of peace only with respect to the Arab polytheists.* **[(source)](http ://seekersguidance.org/ans-blog/2010/11/06/jihad-abrogation-in-the-quran-the-verse-of-the-sword/)**

A classic Islamic Scholar on Qur’an 9:29

*But, this verse is abrogated by the verse of “fighting…Therefore, all people of the world should be called to Islam. If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the Jizya they should be fought till they are killed. This is the meaning of compulsion. **(Tafsir of Ibn Kathir, Al-Firdous Ltd., London, 1999: First Edition, Part 3, pp. 37-38)**

The point here is that the “real” Islam is simply impossible to work out from either the religious texts or the opinions of religious scholars. Therefore, each and every believer is free to choose their own ideological dojo, and every version will be as real as the next one.

Western pundits and Islamic clerics naturally gravitate towards the more peaceful interpretations of these texts. However, history once again serves as the ultimate judge in what principle applies. It turns out that the Noble Caliphate used the very verse of Qur’an 9:29 to form what’s known as *Pact of Umar*, a treaty with the inhabitants of Jerusalem, freshly conquered by Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab.

Here is a short excerpt Qur’anic exegesis by Ibn Kathir, which puts the Pact in context.

Ibn Kathir

Ibn Kathir

Pact of Umar in context

*”Allah said, (until they pay the Jizyah), if they do not choose to embrace Islam, (with willing submission), in defeat and subservience, (and feel themselves subdued.), disgraced, humiliated and belittled. Therefore, Muslims are not allowed to honor the people of Dhimmah or elevate them above Muslims, for they are miserable, disgraced and humiliated. Muslim recorded from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet said, (Do not initiate the Salam to the Jews and Christians, and if you meet any of them in a road, force them to its narrowest alley.) This is why the Leader of the faithful `Umar bin Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, demanded his well-known conditions be met by the Christians, these conditions that ensured their continued humiliation, degradation and disgrace.”* **[(source)](http ://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2566&Itemid=64)**

This gives ample backing to the idea that in reality Islam has many faces – some peaceful and some utterly disgusting and violent. All faces constitute real Islam without exception.

Conclusion

Mehdi Hasan’s article falls apart the minute we engage our brains and go under the skin of Islamic theology and history. It lacks intellectual honesty and is utterly misleading to readers. The reality is that although religious literacy and ceremonial intensity do not cause extremism, Islam – the very real Islam – serves as a perfect fuel for it. The ideology facilitates acquisition of supernatural beliefs and can easily direct believers towards religious violence.

 

Tuesday 8/26: Logan’s Warning on the World Truth Summit!

1391724_615303888510736_1015731033_n-2-300x187Hello friends!

I would just like to inform you that if you go to the Twitter and Facebook pages Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), you will see that they have been utterly defeated in the #ISpeakOutBecause campaign war. It was a great social media victory for Team Infidel!

A victory that shows that everyday people like us can become successful activists, and that is just what my interview on World Truth Summit (WTS) is about. What more we can do to turn things around and win the war with Islam.

human-rights-activists-christian-persecution

The interview goes online Tues August 26Th at 8PM EST, and can be listened to for free for the first 48 hours only! But to do so you must register. You can do that by visiting my WTS about page, by clicking HERE.

Afterwards it will cost $4.95 to hear or $14.95 for the above set of four. Remember, the more knowledge you take in, the stronger our team will be!

Thank you,

Christopher

 

 

 

Tonight 9EST ~ Logan’s Warning on The Last Stand Radio Show

Good afternoon infidels and Islamic lurkers! I just wanted to let you know that tonight I will be back the highly controversial The Last Stand Radio Show, with hosts  Brian Glover AKA SmokieTX, and Ron AKA Gulfdogs.proxy (2)

Tonight we are honored that Christopher Logan of Logan’s Warning is returning to the show. Chris is a counter jihadist that is always taking on the “moderate” muslim on Twitter and in person. A lot of the time he ends up being blocked by them on Twitter but he captures the debates and posts them on his site in hopes that they will see them and continue the debate there. Tonight we will talk about a recent #ISpeakOutBecause campaign on Twitter and Facebook from TheMuslim Public Affairs Council that many of us took part in and much more.

This week we might have more time to visit. Calls are more than welcome and encouraged for tonight’s show. We will have a few things to knock around I am sure. After all we still have the same marxists attempting to destroy our country, unrest in Ferguson, immigrants flooding our border, President “Sound Byte”(© by Vito Esposito), etc.

If you know of a subject that we should be talking about or a guest that we should have on get in touch with @GulfDogs or @smokie_tx on twitter and let us know. We will see what we can do. This show is for us all. We are just the ones on the air.

Thanks for your continued support. We do really appreciate you all taking time out of your Sundays to tune in and take part in the chat room.

On the show we will be speaking about the misleading “moderate” Muslim campaign lead by the Muslim Public Affairs Council….Errrr…Muslim Propagandist Affairs Council (MPAC), the Clarion Project’s huge mistake of buying into the “moderate” Muslim line of thinking, and much more!

The show and the call in number can be found by clicking HERE.

As usual, Muslims are more than welcome to call in. Don’t be shy, Mohammad instructed you to lie, so give it your best shot!

 

 

The Huffington Post’s Kashif N. Chaudhry Responds

xKWBt6mh_reasonably_smallKashif Runs From the Rebuttal

In case you missed it, the other night on Twitter the Huffington Post’s Kashif Chaudhry challenged me to write up a rebuttal of his article on Islam and sex slavery. So of course I took up the challenge.

When I was done I sent him the link.

(Click on images to enlarge.)
Kashif rebuttal sent to

As expected he could not even being to formulate a sentence in an effort to refute my points. Just as the Huffington Post’s Craig Considine had done in the past.

But this gets better. Kashif continued to dig his own hole as he foolishly responded to me in a different Twitter thread.

Kashif responds to others

Then when I reminded him of my article and asked him to condemn Islam for allowing lashings (Koran 24:2), he decided to run away again.

Kashif ducks my article

Kashif ducks lashings

He stayed in hiding until tonight when he attempted to discredit me, and told another Muslim “friend” of mine to ignore me.

Kashif responses says to ignore

From their he tucked his tail between his legs and ran off……err…..flew off on his magic carpet!

images (12)