Friends, I have said over and over. We cannot win the war with Islam unless we win the information war against Muslim propagandists. Otherwise known as “Liars for Allah”. So here in my latest contribution to that cause. One that exposes the UK’s quisling and liar for Allah, Hamza. Of Hamza’s Den.
A YouTube show in which Hamza fancies himself as a lion who is not to be messed with. Talk about delusions of grandeur.
The games begin at the 23:35 mark. (The actual video is the one above. The one below is just a screenshot.)
The exchange lasted for about 4 minutes and if you watch it you will see that Hamza asked me if I think freedom of religion is a British value. Ordering me to answer with a yes or no or he would banish me from the chatroom.
Shortly after his demand I mentioned the Pact of Umar. A pact that clearly discriminates against non-Muslims and enacted by Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab.
(Do not initiate the Salam to the Jews and Christians, and if you meet any of them in a road, force them to its narrowest alley.) This is why the Leader of the faithful `Umar bin Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, demanded his well-known conditions be met by the Christians, these conditions that ensured their continued humiliation, degradation and disgrace. The scholars of Hadith narrated from `Abdur-Rahman bin Ghanm Al-Ash`ari that he said, “I recorded for `Umar bin Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, the terms of the treaty of peace he conducted with the Christians of Ash-Sham: `In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. This is a document to the servant of Allah `Umar, the Leader of the faithful, from the Christians of such and such city. When you (Muslims) came to us we requested safety for ourselves, children, property and followers of our religion. We made a condition on ourselves that we will neither erect in our areas a monastery, church, or a sanctuary for a monk, nor restore any place of worship that needs restoration nor use any of them for the purpose of enmity against Muslims. We will not prevent any Muslim from resting in our churches whether they come by day or night, and we will open the doors ﴿of our houses of worship﴾ for the wayfarer and passerby. Those Muslims who come as guests, will enjoy boarding and food for three days. We will not allow a spy against Muslims into our churches and homes or hide deceit ﴿or betrayal﴾ against Muslims. We will not teach our children the Qur’an, publicize practices of Shirk, invite anyone to Shirk or prevent any of our fellows from embracing Islam, if they choose to do so. We will respect Muslims, move from the places we sit in if they choose to sit in them. We will not imitate their clothing, caps, turbans, sandals, hairstyles, speech, nicknames and title names, or ride on saddles, hang swords on the shoulders, collect weapons of any kind or carry these weapons. We will not encrypt our stamps in Arabic, or sell liquor. We will have the front of our hair cut, wear our customary clothes wherever we are, wear belts around our waist, refrain from erecting crosses on the outside of our churches and demonstrating them and our books in public in Muslim fairways and markets. We will not sound the bells in our churches, except discretely, or raise our voices while reciting our holy books inside our churches in the presence of Muslims, nor raise our voices ﴿with prayer﴾ at our funerals, or light torches in funeral processions in the fairways of Muslims, or their markets. We will not bury our dead next to Muslim dead, or buy servants who were captured by Muslims. We will be guides for Muslims and refrain from breaching their privacy in their homes.’ When I gave this document to `Umar, he added to it, `We will not beat any Muslim. These are the conditions that we set against ourselves and followers of our religion in return for safety and protection. If we break any of these promises that we set for your benefit against ourselves, then our Dhimmah (promise of protection) is broken and you are allowed to do with us what you are allowed of people of defiance and rebellion.”’
As you heard Hamza claimed that I have no idea what I am talking about when it came to the Pact of Umar. Which Implies that it did not discriminate against non-Muslims. Apparently we are supposed to just blindly take his word over the former Caliph himself.
Umar ibn al-Khattab (r. 634-644 CE) was the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate (632-661 CE, as the first four caliphs are referred to by the Sunni Muslims). He was an early convert of Islam and one of the close companions of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad (l. 570-632 CE). After the death of Muhammad, he gave his utmost and loyal support to Abu Bakr, who then became the first caliph. After Abu Bakr’s death in 634 CE, Umar became the next caliph – he continued his predecessor’s campaigns and extended his dominion further from the Arabian Peninsula. In addition to multiple military successes, his reign was marked with marvels in administration. After his death, he was succeeded by Uthman ibn Affan (l. 579-656 CE) as the third ruler of the Rashidun Caliphate.
After the quisling’s blatant lie he went onto telling me to “shut up” when I mentioned the fact that I use scholarly sources to prove my claims on Islam. Him lying and attempting to order around a non-Muslim excited some of his other lying minions for Allah.
Instead of discussing Islam itself Hamza wanted to mislead the viewers into believing he has British values. Let’s see if he was telling the truth or lying again.
Age of Marriage
Islam
From the world renowned Tafsir (scholarly interpretation and explanation of the Koran) Ibn Kathir.
Unfortunately you can see that Islam has no age minimum for marriages. Even allowing prepubescent ones.
Sex Slavery
Islam (Right hand posses is the the taking of sex slaves)
Muslims want us to believe that females who have been captured in war by Muslims and have captured husbands in the same camp, want to actually have sex with those who captured them. Obviously not. Those with morals know that is rape.
Sahih Muslim Ahadith (Authentic words and deed of Mohammad.)
Sahih Muslim Book 008, Hadith Number 3371
Chapter: Al-Azl (incomplete sexual intercourse): Coitus Interruptus.
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
What was that you were saying about British values Hamza? No wonder you ran off Lion for Allah. You’re a lion alright, but clearly not the one you portray yourself to be though.
Recent Comments