Oklahoma Police Capt Suspended for not Ordering his men to Attend Mosque!

That’s right friends, you read it right! Whatever happened to freedom of choice? Will the Mosque leaders come out in support of the Captain’s freedom of choice, or are they “offended”?!

Hat tip to Mike-Carol.

Oklahoma police captain suspended for not ordering his officers to attend event at mosque

TULSA, Okla. (AP) β€” A Tulsa police captain who wouldn’t make his officers attend a Law Enforcement Appreciation Day at a local mosque because it violated his religious beliefs has been suspended without pay for two weeks.

According to a personnel order, Capt. Paul Fields was suspended for violating the department’s rules on being obedient and on conduct unbecoming of an officer.

The appreciation day was held March 4 at the mosque of the Islamic Society of Tulsa as a way of thanking officers for their response to a threat against the organization.

In February, Deputy Chief Daryl Webster told Fields that the event was voluntary, but officers could be assigned to it if there weren’t enough volunteers.

Fields’ Scott Wood has filed a grievance over the suspension and a lawsuit is pending.

Related issue. Oklahoma is the same state where Judge Miles-LaGrange vetoed the anti-Sharia vote.

Link to Article

Comments

comments

64 comments for “Oklahoma Police Capt Suspended for not Ordering his men to Attend Mosque!

    • admin
      June 14, 2011 at 10:13 pm

      Thanks for the repost Mom!

    • Brian Jones
      June 16, 2011 at 9:03 am

      This is absolutely absurd. The Chief of police should be forced to resign, IMMEDIATLEY for not focusing on his men and rather attempting to seduce the Islam community and their “Infadel” hating bigotry.

      Any Tulsa Citizen who does not stand up and say something about this is a COWARD! This officer should be commended for his service to our community, not rebuked for refusing to attend a service in a anti-God group of people. This is absolutely outrageous!

      • GUNNERY SERAGENT HARTMEN
        June 16, 2011 at 9:32 am

        WERE YOU BORN A FAT SLIMY SCUMBAG PUKE FACE PIECE OF SHIT? OR DID YOU HAVE TO WORK ON IT.

      • GUNNERY SERAGENT HARTMEN
        June 16, 2011 at 9:34 am

        HEY BRAIN SORRY ABOUT THAT DIDNT READ YOU POST CLEAR ENOUGH. I THOUGHT YOU WERE SUPPORTING THE OFFICER BEING SUSPENEDED.

      • Adina Kutnicki, Israel
        June 16, 2011 at 11:51 pm

        Of course this act of submission, via the Police Department’s dictates to an officer, is outrageous on its face.HOWEVER, this coercion is not coming out of the blue. It is the DIRECT result of the Infiltration within.Read, Infiltration by Sperry and the Muslim Mafia, by Gaubatz and Sperry.
        It will ALL become clear……

    • June 18, 2011 at 3:32 pm

      this is simply pressure to be politically correct, and accept the fact our elected officials are going to try and force us all to accept muslims, islam, and shariah law…..and I say, Police Chief, you have made a serious MIScalculation, you cannot, and WILL not force ME, or anyone else to accept people sworn to my submission to them and or destruction…..Period…, and I agree, say good bye Chief of Police, your kind we do not need ..

    • November 3, 2011 at 10:18 am

      funny about liberal progressives, they see nothing wrong with forcing islam on us, yet Christianity and Judaism off unacceptable……the New State religion cant include GOD, or Jesus…..well that isnt just a tough sell, but the bloodshed will be huge if this continues….

  1. boniferous
    June 14, 2011 at 10:16 pm

    These Muslims better be pandering to the local police officers in every way possible. We all know what happens when you get on the bad side of a cop. If people even began to have a clue how many times these police officers showed up at a residence because of domestic violence and the man was Muslim, they’d understand the stupidity of the Deputy. People need to leave these officers to do their jobs and leave politics out of it. The Islamic society of Tulsa is probably just attempting to make itself “look good” to buffer any future bad publicity. The officers know better! And why oh WHY did you have to remind me of that B*TCH – LaGrange?!!!

    • admin
      June 14, 2011 at 10:40 pm

      Just doing my thing. Sorry. πŸ™‚

      • boniferous
        June 16, 2011 at 8:58 am

        And you do it so well. lol

    • June 15, 2011 at 8:15 pm

      as our country burns so should the religious organisations whoes extremist start the fires

    • June 18, 2011 at 3:37 pm

      according to the quran, Koran, which ever way you spell it, muslims are told in their “version” of the bible to LIE and to decieve anyone they need to so long as it furthers the agenda of islam, ask a muslim what taqiyya and kitman is, see what they sya, then read THIS….

      http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/011-taqiyya.htm

  2. Damien
    June 14, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    Admin,

    Also, whatever happened to the separation of Church and State?

    • admin
      June 14, 2011 at 10:46 pm

      For the most part that only applies to Christianity it seems. While Islam gets its own set of rules.

      • eib
        June 15, 2011 at 6:03 am

        The idea of separation of religion from the state, of religion from anything, is alien to Islam.
        Muslims come from a pre-Christian tradition in which religion was pantheistic– it penetrated and permeated every aspect of life.
        Muslims remain in this pantheistic, magical-thinking world.
        They have never grown away from it.
        A former Muslim recently wrote that she washes her hands before praying (now Christian) after petting her dog because she still has it in her head that dog saliva makes prayers “null and void.”
        This is an example of magical thinking, and it is only associated with the most primitive of religion and it certainly pre-dates Judaism.
        It also pre-dates the thinking of the Axial Age, 800-200 BC, the greatest period of philosophical/ religious achievement man has ever known.
        This is just how irrationally backward Islam is.

        • Roy
          June 16, 2011 at 8:02 am

          Islam dates to 622 AD, Muhammad’s Hijra to Medina to become a warlord. He included all types of borrowed concets from other religions but his religion/ideology dates to the early 600 AD (Annos Dominae, Year of Our Lord)

        • Roy
          June 16, 2011 at 8:04 am

          And allah (the god of the Quran) is a hate filled god unlike the loving God of the Bible, the Father of Jesus and the God of Abraham.

    • eib
      June 15, 2011 at 5:59 am

      The separation of church/ religion from the state was an idea that took centuries to form in the minds of Westerners.
      Look at the Lay Investiture Crisis, the crisis between the Church and the English Courts, and then go to the Reformation and Wars of Religion.
      It took many conflicts and much tension to work out the wall of separation solution.
      But once understood and banished to the personal sphere, once individualized, religion no longer threatened the existence of the state.
      If anything, religion was validated and political authority was at the same time.
      Look at the 2 Awakenings in American history.
      These did not overturn political authority even when they were at odds with it.
      Proof positive that the wall of separation is a stabilizing force in Western culture.
      I’m surprised that this chain of events is not taught in high school.
      As far as I’m concerned, no one should turn 19 without knowing it and being able to describe it.

      • onaroll
        June 15, 2011 at 7:31 pm

        Just what is really taught in school today? Science and math have real thought processes, and possess — or compel– real answers. The humanities, aside from dates of documented events are a mere reflection of opinion and empirical conclusion, further removed from reality by every re laundering through every subsequent generation of nonwitness.

        We need a grammar school education that teaches the3 Rs, and a kindle and the unapplied time to use it for home schooling for all the rest.

    • Ramon
      June 15, 2011 at 1:10 pm

      Um, guys, gals… the wall of separation is not in our law (in principle, not practice) nor Constitution. It WAS in a letter – Thomas Jefferson’s Jan 1, 1802 letter, called the Wall of Separation Letter, was to the Danbury Baptist Association.
      The Danbury Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut sent a letter, dated October 7, 1801, to the newly elected President Thomas Jefferson, expressing concern over the lack in their state constitution of explicit protection of religious liberty, and against a government establishment of religion.
      The Danbury Baptist Assoc., religious beliefs were that church and state had to be separate. They wrote, “Our Sentiments are uniformly on the side of Religious Liberty β€” That Religion is at all times and places a matter between God and individuals β€” That no man ought to suffer in name, person, or effects on account of his religious Opinions β€” That the legitimate Power of civil government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbor…”

      Tho Jefferson concurred with them. This is not law, however, legal precedent has observed the alleged wall for most of the 20th century. In theory this should mean that the state has no influence to control religion, in practice this is not so. It has also been taken to mean that when a conservative candidate speaks in a church or to a religious audience, leftists cry and whine. When a libtard speaks to a religious group somewhere, its ok.

      • eib
        June 15, 2011 at 2:07 pm

        quote:
        , guys, gals… the wall of separation is not in our law (in principle, not practice) nor Constitution.
        end.

        Of course it isn’t.
        You do not know anything about “implied powers.”
        Just because they are implied does not mean they are any less real.
        By your logic, we should not have the Supreme Court either.

        • New Crusader
          June 18, 2011 at 5:21 pm

          “By your logic, we should not have the Supreme Court either.”

          Sometimes that does not seem like a bad idea.

      • eib
        June 15, 2011 at 2:10 pm

        You obviously do not see the liberal tradition as being continuous with anything in Europe.
        Serious mistake.
        The Western tradition is older than any American or Oriental one.

      • eib
        June 15, 2011 at 2:14 pm

        Quote:
        In theory this should mean that the state has no influence to control religion, in practice this is not so.
        end.

        Where does government regulate the practice of religion in the U.S.?
        If anything, we should be far more nervous about the power of religion to control or intimidate secular authority.
        In the issue of Islam, this is precisely what it is doing!
        The government is cowed.
        Civil authorities are silenced.
        And if you think Christians won’t be hurt as a result, think again.

    • Debora
      June 15, 2011 at 3:18 pm

      Most people do not known with the separation of Church and State is. Study the Consitution. And lean all that you can about the founding fathers.

    • June 15, 2011 at 8:24 pm

      betty soretoe, alias obama, eliminated it with his presidential perogative, assisted by s lick willie clinton. faggots in america

    • RangerX
      June 16, 2011 at 11:37 pm

      The separation of church and state is NOT an American theme. No STATE religion is, but not a separation of the two.

      The founding fathers took God’s contribution to making America great and free very seriously. They would have NEVER approved of the current motto of “separation of church and state.”

      Why? Do you honestly not know that separation of church and state is one of the primary planks of the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO, NOT American ideals. God has ALWAYS been a very big part of America and American government, at least until the last 80 years or so, when all the scumbags were allowed to breed and infest our government.

      • admin
        June 16, 2011 at 11:54 pm

        Welcome to the site RangerX!

  3. June 15, 2011 at 5:20 am

    Will the ACLU object?

    • Debora
      June 15, 2011 at 3:19 pm

      most likey not.

    • June 15, 2011 at 8:17 pm

      We would be acting in our best interest to remove aclu from mainstream america. Personally I think they should be done away with, for all the death behind their bizarre acts aimed at destablizing america

  4. Stephen Gash
    June 15, 2011 at 5:30 am

    If there were no mosques in the USA there would be no problems like this one.

    We need to make the West to Islam what Saudi Arabia is to all other religions.

    Well I say “religion”, but we all know that Islam is merely a grubby, oligarchical, theocratic despotism, masquerading as a religion because it maintains it has some dodgy deity that can’t make its mind up and therefore abrogates every thought it has.

    Well I say “thought”, but we all know “surge of insouciant malice” to be exquisitely accurate.

  5. June 15, 2011 at 5:37 am

    What ever happened to “separation of church and state?”
    I was thinking exactly the same thing.

    I wish them luck with their lawsuit and I hope the people of Tulsa get out and protest this travesty of justice within the police force.
    Oklahoma is going Eurabia fast thanks to Supreme Court Judge “Bitch” LaGrange’s rulng.
    I apologize for rehashing her name but we must be continually reminded for posterity.

    I think America is going down the tubes to a National Socialist Islamic Republic faster than most good people have time to fully realize. It happened as soon as Obama’s left foot crossed the threshold of the Whitehouse.

  6. June 15, 2011 at 7:27 am

    It’s an easy case for the police to win. We still have freedom of religion in the USA. No one in the USA may attend any church or mosque if he doesn’t want to. No one can give an outward approval to any so-called religion if he doesn’t want too. EASY CASE.
    ——————————————

    Let me remind you again that Islam is a Crime Syndicate masquerading as a religion.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that uses Suicide Bombers.

    Islam isn’t the only Crime Syndicate that murders its members if they abandon Islam. The Mafia also murders its members if they abandon the Mafia Crime Syndicate.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that forces underage little girls to “marry” depraved Muslim male sex perverts. Not even Communism or Nazism committed this vicious crime.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that allows depraved, sinful Muslim male sex perverts to rape underage little girls after forced marriages. Sometimes the little girls can be as young as five years old. Aisha, the little girl that Muhammad the Pervert married, was six years old when she “married” Muhammad the Pervert. Muhammad the Pervert legally raped Aisha when she was only eight years and nine months old. Aisha said that she was “still playing with dolls” when Muhammad the Pervert raped her.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that lashes underage little girls that try to escape depraved Muslim male sex perverts who repeatedly rape these little girls.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that relegates women to second class status or worse. Not even Communism or Nazism did this.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that outlaws all religions except their so-called religion. In this respect, the Crime Syndicate of Islam is very much like Communism and defunct Nazism. They, too, outlawed religions, especially the Christian religion.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that hangs homosexuals and lesbians by the neck until dead, or cuts off their heads with a sword.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that allows depraved Muslim sadists to chop off clitorises of little girls as the little girls scream for mercy. The Muslim god, Satan, also known as Allah, rejoices when Muslim sadists chop off clitorises of little girls. The Muslim sadists also rejoice.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that chops off hands, feet, and gouges out eyes of petty thieves, both male and female.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that has members that are easily “hurt” when we criticize them for the brutality they perpetrate against humanity.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that legally allows husbands to beat their wives.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that allows polygamy and therefore legalized adultery.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that can legally practice hypocrisy.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that stones women to death for committing adultery. The depraved Muslim husbands are not stoned to death for committing adultery. The depraved Muslims may “marry” as many women as they want, and then legally commit adultery. The depraved Muslim husbands may also legally have sex with whores with impunity. If Muslim women had sex with men other than their husbands, they would be stoned to death.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that teaches that “Muslims are the best of people,” this despite all the legal criminal activity committed by Muslims.

    Islam is the only Crime Syndicate that labels all so-called infidels as second class citizens.

    Friends, this is why we must fight to destroy the Criminal Activity of Islam before the Criminal Activity of Islam destroys us. Okay?

    • Roy
      June 16, 2011 at 8:09 am

      Good factual post, Truth Detector!

  7. sablegsd
    June 15, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    Damn but I hate muslims. Every stinking one of them. Name one good thing done by one kuranimal, EVER!
    Name one achievment in the last, oh I don’t know, 500 years? Music,literature,science? NONE!

    Worthless misogynistic, baby raping, lazy, inbred, violent, delusional wastes of air. And those are their good qualities.

    Americans that pander to these douchenozzles are traitors and should be treated like one.

    STOP MUSLIM IMMIGRATION!

    Like Ann Barnhardt says, “this ain’t rocket surgery.”

    • Connie
      June 15, 2011 at 1:48 pm

      sablegsd…You said it all..and, I agree with every word of it. Thanks!

    • eib
      June 15, 2011 at 2:15 pm

      I don’t hate them.
      But Islam, their culture and their hatred of the other are all absolutely REPULSIVE to me.

    • Damien
      June 15, 2011 at 10:50 pm

      sablegsd,

      You mean “Brain Surgery” don’t you? surgeons don’t fix rockets, mechanics do. Mechanics fix machines, surgeons fix people.

      • sablegsd
        June 16, 2011 at 5:14 pm

        No, I meant what I typed. πŸ™‚

  8. June 15, 2011 at 8:10 pm

    This reminds me of the case in which Fire Fighters were forced to participate in a “Gay pride” parade a few years ago. IIRC they won their case, eventually.

    I wonder when the last time was that these Officers were compelled to attend a Christian or Jewish event?

    Are Law Enforcement agencies and our military being purged of devout non-musilms? It almost seems to me as if they are.

    How many Police Departments are now “unofficially” enforcing Sharia Law while ignoring American Constitutional Law as it applies to Muslims?

  9. June 15, 2011 at 8:19 pm

    Any gang of men who do not tolerate people who don’t act like them, should be treated with the same respect they show others—removed from the country, jailed or terminated

  10. June 15, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    Ladies, don a burka, forget how to read, and stay in your house, unless you are a direct descendent of muhammed.then you are nobility and can do as you wish

    • November 3, 2011 at 10:14 am

      Jackie, and have them get cuffs and rope so they can be tied for sex, as well as the children…..or whomever they decide to hump

  11. D Bro
    June 15, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    Sure hope they get to the bottom of this. If it was voluntary, why did Fields get suspended? Is the meaning of voluntary like in the Army: we need 3 volunteers,you,you,and you. If I have a day off,do I have to spend it at this ceremony?
    Did all the no-shows make Webster look bad, after all, you can’t do PR if know one shows up. The mosque must not of done there homework if no one wanted to show up or is there something more? Glad Fields filed a grievance, good luck!

  12. Truth
    June 16, 2011 at 7:04 am

    No government employee (police officer) can order another government employee to attend a religious meeting. Not in the USA. This needs to be contested in court.

  13. June 16, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    Yeah I wrote about this extensively on a national police website forum a few months ago and most of the cops there didn’t support this brave officer.

    I spent 7 years there altogether trying to convince cops that they are being misused, misled and indoctrinated by the state-ists amongst police leadership and I finally gave up the other day.

    • admin
      June 16, 2011 at 8:20 pm

      Take a break and regroup. Don’t give up!

  14. pma
    June 16, 2011 at 9:09 pm

    Sigh! America is either racist or religious fanatic!

    Malcolm X – Ballot or Bullet
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRNciryImqg&feature=player_embedded

    • admin
      June 16, 2011 at 9:20 pm

      Where is the racism?

    • eib
      June 17, 2011 at 4:32 am

      1. the culture & society are secular.
      2. Islam is not a race.

    • admin
      June 16, 2011 at 10:13 pm

      You said America. What racism are you talking about?

      Thank you.

  15. deb
    June 16, 2011 at 11:30 pm

    good, maybe they’ll stop issuing traffic tickets in protest and act like protectors of our community instead of code enforcement officers..

    • admin
      June 16, 2011 at 11:54 pm

      So you agree with bowing to Islam?

    • November 3, 2011 at 10:12 am

      deb, get a grip, they Violated his right to being “forced” to attend ANY religious event…..Period, and you lady are as many…..clueless…

  16. sir
    June 17, 2011 at 12:46 am

    why should the police be ‘forced’ to attend any mosque? i’d only attend if it were to watch it being pulled down.
    i kinda wish everyone would start going on a rampage and get rid of these dam muslims once in for all, we are tired of muslims this and muslims that.

    • eib
      June 17, 2011 at 4:34 am

      I would refuse to attend on the grounds that
      1. I am not a Muslim,
      2. I am not a Muslim, and
      3. I am not a Muslim.

  17. November 3, 2011 at 10:11 am

    I live in Tulsa and am looking into the results of this case, I’ll get back as soon as I find out something to tell you all

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *