~UK: Archbishop of Canterbury ~ Islamic Law Protects Christians~

Now, this is exactly what I am talking about when I assert that there are FAR too many non-Muslims who are clearly supporting the ideology of the enemy. Such “sympathetic” non-Muslims are aiding in the destruction of Western Civilization. To make matters worse, some of the enablers of Islam are people in high positions of power, the UK’s Dr. Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, for example. The Archbishop of Canterbury, who is the head of the Church of England. With that position, one would think that he would actually stand up for his own religion and those who are supposed to be his flock. Think again!

Besides being a big supporter of the UK’s Sharia Courts, The Archbishop is now spreading false information about Sharia Law. Propagating such misinformation about Sharia is detrimental to Christians.

A truly Islamic state protects Christians

London – In the history of some countries there comes a period when political and factional murder becomes almost routine – Russia at the beginning of the 20th century, Germany and its neighbours in the early 1930s. It has invariably been the precursor of a breakdown of legal and political order and of long-term suffering for a whole population. And last week, with the killing of Shahbaz Bhatti, the Minister for Minorities, Pakistan has taken a further step down this catastrophic road.

To those who actually support such atrocities, there is little to say. They inhabit a world of fantasy, shot through with paranoid anxiety. As the shocked responses from so many Muslims in this country and elsewhere make plain, their actions are as undermining of Qur’anic ethics as they are of rational politics.

In your eyes, it is reasonable for the Koran to call for the dominance of Christians?

Koran verse 009.029
YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Or, perhaps the Archbishop is only going on the word of Muslims, and he himself has never even bothered to read the Koran?

But to those who recognise something truly dreadful going on in their midst – to the majority in Pakistan who have elected a government that, whatever its dramatic shortcomings, is pledged to resist extremism – we have surely to say, “Do not imagine that this can be ‘managed’ or tolerated.”

Define “extremism” Archbishop. Was Mohammad who called for the dominance of Christians, an “extremist”?

Muslim Hadith Book 019, Number 4366:
It has been narrated by ‘Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.

Did you not notice the name of the country is the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?

The government of Pakistan and the great majority of its population are, in effect, being blackmailed. The widespread and deep desire for Pakistan to be what it was meant to be, for justice to be guaranteed for all, and for some of the most easily abused laws on the statute book to be reviewed is being paralysed by the threat of murder. The blasphemy case of the Pakistani Christian woman, Aasia Noreen, so prominent in the debates of recent months, and the connected murder of Salman Taseer, the Governor of the Punjab, make it crystal clear that there is a faction in Pakistan wholly uninterested in justice and due process of law, concerned only with promoting an inhuman pseudo-religious tyranny.

Dr. Williams, why do you act like you speak for the Muslims of Pakistan? You do not!There is a reason that they wanted their own state, their sovereignty, and I’m pretty sure it has something to do with Islam…

Apparently, you have not read the Koran. So, now I have to ask if you have ever even glimpsed the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? If not, I will gladly help you out by supplying it here.

PART II

Fundamental Rights and Principles of Policy

Chapter 1. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

25. Equality of citizens.
(1) All citizens are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law.

Sounds nice, but then there is this part.

PART IX PART IX

Islamic Provisions

227. Provisions relating to the Holy Qur’an and Sunnah.
(1) All existing laws shall be brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah, in this Part referred to as the Injunctions of Islam, and no law shall be enacted which is repugnant to such Injunctions.

[242] [Explanation:- In the application of this clause to the personal law of any Muslim sect, the expression “Quran and Sunnah” shall mean the Quran and Sunnah as interpreted by that sect.]

(2) Effect shall be given to the provisions of clause (1) only in the manner provided in this Part.
(3) Nothing in this Part shall affect the personal laws of non- Muslim citizens or their status as citizens.

Now we see the double-talk. Because the injunctions of Islam do affect non-Muslims.

Pakistan was created by Muhammad Ali Jinnah as a consciously Muslim state in which, nonetheless, the non-Muslim enjoyed an absolute right of citizenship and the civic securities and liberties that go with it. In common with the best historical examples of Muslim governance, there was a realistic and generous recognition that plural and diverse convictions would not go away and that therefore a just Muslim state, no more and no less than a just Christian or secular state, had to provide for the rights of its minorities.

Here’s a look at one of the “best historical examples of Muslim governance”.

The Christians of Najran, Medina, refused conversion to Islam in 631 A.D. and offered Mohamad to maintain their faith, accept the dominance of Muslims and pay an annual tribute (the jizya), he accepted and the pact was sealed between them.

Unfortunately, the Archbishop is not done bowing to Islam…

If the state’s willingness to guarantee absolute security for minorities of every kind is a test of political maturity and durability, whatever the confessional background, Pakistan’s founding vision was a mature one. The disdain shown for that vision by Bhatti’s killers is an offence against Islam as much as against Christianity in Pakistan.

Islam is an offence against Christianity. So why are you standing up for it?

What needs to change?

Suicidal Westerners, like you need to change!

Most Muslim thinkers are embarrassed by supposedly “Islamic” laws in various contexts that conceal murderous oppression and bullying. Their voices are widely noted; they need to be heard more clearly in Pakistan, where part of the problem is the weakening of properly traditional Islam by the populist illiteracies of modern extremism.

Name them Williams, who are these voices? I have already proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that Islamic Law is oppressive. So have some integrity and stop fabricating things as you go along!

SNIP

Bhatti died, for all practical purposes, as a martyr – let me be clear – not simply for his Christian faith, but for a vision shared between Pakistani Christians and Muslims. When he and I talked at Lambeth Palace in London last year, he was fully aware of the risks he ran. He did not allow himself to be diverted for a moment from his commitment to justice for all.

What shared vision? The same one that you have about Christians being “protected” by Islamic Law? As in the remainder of his article, the Archbishop continues to make statements without any factual foundation. Well here is a FACT: Christians are “protected” under Islamic Law. They are “protected” from Muslims! in as much as they pay the jizya (extortion) and bow to Islamic dominance.

o11.9 If non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state refuse to conform to the rules of Islam or pay the non-Muslim poll tax, than their agreement with the state has been violated. (dis: o11.11) (A: though if only one of them disobeys, it concerns him alone).

Once the agreement is “violated”, under Sharia, Christians can be put to death or enslaved!

Why did The Archbishop leave out all of those pretty important facts?! Was he exhibiting ignorance or weakness? Either way, he is a no Christian leader. But, in actuality, he is a thorn in the side of Christianity!

Comments

comments

64 comments for “~UK: Archbishop of Canterbury ~ Islamic Law Protects Christians~

  1. March 24, 2011 at 8:12 am

    A REMINDER: There are no lessons on Morality, Justice, Honesty, or Love in the Muslim Quran. It’s all about hatred in the Quran.

    • GenePoole
      August 1, 2012 at 3:46 am

      Bullshit. from Wikipedia:
      Under sharia law, dhimmi status was originally afforded to Jews, Christians, and Sabians. The protected religions later came to include Zoroastrians, Mandaeans, Hindus and Buddhists.[5][6] Eventually, the Hanafi, the largest school of Islamic legal thought, applied this term to all non-Muslims living in Islamic lands outside the sacred area surrounding Mecca, Saudi Arabia.[7]

  2. Chris
    March 24, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Christians and Jews must also recognize that Islam calls the Judeo-Christian faiths “remnant cults.” Here is the statement from the classic manual of Sharia Law, “The Reliance of the Traveler”: “Previously revealed religions were valid in their own eras, as is attested to by many verses in the Holy Koran, but were abrogated by the universal message of Islam. . . [I]t is unbelief (kufr) to hold that the remnant cults, such as “Christianity” or “Judaism,” are acceptable to Allah Most High after He sent the final Messenger to the entire world.” (w4.1, page 846)

    We must reject that notion with all our resources. The Archbishop has no cojones.

  3. eib
    March 24, 2011 at 9:00 am

    They must have held the knife to his throat.
    Sharia protects no one but Muslims, and even then, there is no protection from the violence that is truly INHERENT in Muslim culture.
    Islamic tradition despises and persecutes Westerners and Christians particularly.
    Only in the recent past has it become anti-semitic.
    This prelate is a pretender.
    He must not be followed.

  4. eib
    March 24, 2011 at 9:02 am

    Quote:
    Most Muslim thinkers are embarrassed by supposedly “Islamic” laws in various contexts that conceal murderous oppression and bullying.
    end quote.

    As a Westerner, I don’t give a damn about Muslim embarrassment.
    Muslims persecute and destroy all that is not Islam.
    Everything I am and love is threatened, debased by Islam.
    Their embarrassment is NOTHING to me.

  5. eib
    March 24, 2011 at 9:04 am

    Quote:
    They inhabit a world of fantasy, shot through with paranoid anxiety. As the shocked responses from so many Muslims in this country and elsewhere make plain, their actions are as undermining of Qur’anic ethics as they are of rational politics.
    end quote.

    Your grace, you are sorely deceived.

  6. eib
    March 24, 2011 at 10:29 am

    Quote:
    When he and I talked at Lambeth Palace in London last year, he was fully aware of the risks he ran.
    end quote.

    And this is supposed to excuse his murderers?

  7. Damien
    March 24, 2011 at 11:24 am

    Admin,

    I think it was Youtube user Sardonic Skeptic who said it best in one of his videos, in response to a Muslim who said that it was ridiculous to think that Islam is intolerant because Muslims, Christians and Jews coexisted in the Middle East for generations, he asked “How was it that blacks coexisted with whites in South Africa for generations?” Allowing a group of people to simply co exist with your group does not equal genuine tolerance. Without equality under the law, its not very tolerant.

  8. New Crusader
    March 24, 2011 at 11:29 am

    Dear Archbishop;
    You apparently have not read the Quran, perhaps you can remember this from the words of Christ.

    “You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’” … Then the disciples came and said to him, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?”. He answered, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted, will be rooted up. Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.”

    Matthew 15

    See yourself in here anywhere?

  9. Koala Bear
    March 24, 2011 at 1:50 pm

    It is like a nightmare! Apparently Prince Charles is not going to be defender of the faith when the Queen dies. He will be defender of “all faiths” now. Talk about stabbing Christianity in the heart and beating it to death. Some Christians!

  10. March 24, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    Imposter! It is simply amazing how cowardly and despicable the robed class can become, in every generation, in every sect, in every cursed breath of misguided prosperity.

  11. March 24, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    I assume Rowan Williams feel himself properly subdued by now. Our only consolation is that he will spend the afterlife in the muz paradise a k a Hell to us.

  12. March 24, 2011 at 6:31 pm

    Well done, another excellent exposure, Chris!

    Islam is predation. Read its canon of scripture, tradition, biography and jurisprudence to realize that truth, then proclaim it openly.

    My piece on the new HRC resolution combating negative stereotyping goes to the rotten core of the matter.

  13. March 25, 2011 at 1:49 am

    What on earth has gone so horribly wrong with the English in a mere three generations? Can these be the same people who won the Battle of Britain against the Luftwaffe?
    Why on earth haven’t the Anglicans hanged this pompous, moronic, bloated traitor yet?

  14. Kelly Kafir
    March 25, 2011 at 1:55 am

    Well, when I was living in the UK, the Brits were a little on the wimpy side… no backbone and apparently no brains either! Guess all that inbreeding has finally taken it’s toll. (Cept I love the EDL – rock on brothers and sisters!!)

    • emmi
      March 25, 2011 at 2:59 pm

      Kelly Kafir, your sweeping statement that the Brits are wimpy, without backbone and brains as a result of inbreeding, displays quite a large chunk of ignorance and certainly a lack of evidence.
      All countries have backward people, including your own. Our soldiers are fighting militant Islam alongside
      American soldiers so are both countries sending spineless, brainless, inbred wimps to war?
      No brains? Why do so many Americans and other non-Brits try to get into our top universities?
      In saying that the Brits are wimpy,spineless, brainless and inbred you are implying that you are not. So, why haven’t you stopped the mosque at Ground Zero and if it goes ahead, will you stop the opening on 11th September? Will you stop it being named after the first mosque the Muslims built in Spain when they conquered that country?
      Every country is suffering from the effects of Islam. We are all being slowly strangled by it. We are doing our best and the EDL is evidence of this.
      There was no need for you to write such a post, but you clearly found being nasty irresistible. So who exactly are you fighting?

  15. CGW
    March 25, 2011 at 1:56 am

    A once-great Empire, now brought low by philobarbarism and a savage, Satan-worshipping cult.

    • Dag
      March 25, 2011 at 11:49 am

      Good choice of terms, especially “philobarbarism.”

      • eib
        March 25, 2011 at 12:53 pm

        Islam has no philosophy.
        Philobarbarism is the best they could do.
        And that’s not very good.

  16. March 25, 2011 at 2:36 am

    I guess Garth Brooks isn’t the only idiot, who knows people in low places.

  17. filthy kafur
    March 25, 2011 at 2:53 am

    We in the UK are being railroaded like you never knew! The archbishop stuff is old news..look at this..and ill send you lots if you want it

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1031611/Sharia-law-SHOULD-used-Britain-says-UKs-judge.html

  18. filthy kafur
    March 25, 2011 at 2:55 am

    Piggy banks are illegal in uk
    http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/396

  19. filthy kafur
    March 25, 2011 at 2:57 am
    • eib
      March 25, 2011 at 5:57 am

      I would add two-counter-conditions to this:
      1. it has to be an attack dog and
      2. it has to be unleashed.

  20. Skipping Girl
    March 25, 2011 at 3:00 am

    Stupid old bastard. Someone needs to show him some footage of the Beslan school massacre. Or the Bali bombings or any of the other atrocities committed in the name of the religion of peace.

  21. filthy kafur
    March 25, 2011 at 3:01 am

    We are forced to eat halal food in the uk..its been slowly killed in fear, and had prayers to allah said over it..and we are supposed to say nothing

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1313303/Britain-goes-halal—tells-public.html

    • eib
      March 25, 2011 at 5:58 am

      And I would add a few counter-conditions to this:
      The halal food must be prepared and served alongside pork and a huge bottle of wine.
      As for the prayers.
      The non-Muslims should be free to turn their backs.
      That would be a fitting tribute to the false god Allah.
      I’m surprised that the Brits have not decided to impose counter-conditions to these unreasonable demands!

  22. liz
    March 25, 2011 at 3:06 am

    to bring on the muslim “messiah” and judgment day, all jews on the planet must be killed. maybe the archbishop hates jews so much he’s willing to sacrifice his own followers and other christians to attain a judenrein world. or maybe he’s a kgb infiltrator working to destroy christianity from within. that’s not far fetched at all. decades ago kgb agents and other marxists loyal to communism, entered the priesthood to destroy the billion member catholic church’s authority and undermine belief in G-d. “liberation theology” was created by the kgb to spread socialism/communism around the world under the guise of religion. many central and south american nations are now bearing the fruit of this tyranny. obama’s former church teaches the black version of liberation theology. yasser arafat was trained by the kgb in the sixties to be a successful terrorist in both violence and propaganda. the whole “palestinian nationhood” scam is a kgb creation. osama’s right hand man, al-zawahiri, was trained by the kgb and most likely an actual kgb agent. osama could be one too. islam may be a supremacist, expansionist, totalitarian ideology, with a 1400 year history of extreme violence, imposing a reign of terror on subjugated peoples, but they are wild and chaotic like their ancestor ishmael. the propaganda, planning, training, control, direction, and manipulation is coming from behind the scene. russia is the puppetmaster. in modern history muslim nations have aligned themselves with fascist and communist nations. the deranged death cult and the G-dless marxist menance work together to rule the world.

  23. March 25, 2011 at 4:21 am

    For those of you who have not read it before, here is a wonderful adaptation of Chaucer, destined to go down in the annals of history http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2008/02/heere-bigynneth.html

  24. March 25, 2011 at 5:44 am

    His problem is not being British, but Catholic. His head is the Pope, not Jesus. Blind guide indeed.
    Maybe he didn’t hear Choudary’s threats: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/01/anjem-choudary-we-need-to-go-to-rome-and-raise-a-banner-saying-the-day-of-judgment-will-come-when-th.html
    Does he think he will escape Islam’s wrath?

    • eib
      March 25, 2011 at 6:00 am

      Not true.
      The head of the church is the Queen of England.
      Act of Supremacy.
      Signed almost 500 years ago.
      As for the Pope, he has yet to implement measures that take the threat of Islam seriously.
      His advice must come from the Orthodox patriarchs, who have lived with Islam for centuries.
      Protestantism alone cannot defeat Islam.

      • emmi
        March 25, 2011 at 1:01 pm

        The Pope wouldn’t take the threat of Islam seriously as he would see secularism as a bigger enemy. A Catholic cardinal, O’Connor, stated that they could now join with Islam in defeating secularism which is sweeping Europe.

        • eib
          March 26, 2011 at 6:32 pm

          They have no idea who their real enemies are.

    • New Crusader
      April 3, 2011 at 3:05 pm

      A better question: Does he think he will escape the wrath of God?

  25. March 25, 2011 at 6:32 am

    As ex-Cof E I am embarassed and ashamed of a man who seems to sold out to Islam and the whole world of Christians. He is a traitor. Where does the Royal family stand on this?

  26. Lord Tottenham
    March 25, 2011 at 7:51 am

    For all those not from England.
    Rowan Williams has for quite some time, been thought of as a sandle wearing, yogurt knitting lefty idiot who dare not stand up for Christianity,less it offends someone.

  27. Rene
    March 25, 2011 at 11:40 am

    what they teach in Catholic schools about I-slam is perfect example of dhimwitty.

  28. March 25, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    came across another article in which last paragraph references a negative comment by a bishop in the Church of England about the creeping shariah across Britain:
    http://www.hudson-ny.org/1971/europe-most-islamic-community

    and here is the original article (2008) mentioned:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1574694/Bishop-warns-of-no-go-zones-for-non-Muslims.html

  29. Jo Alex SG
    March 25, 2011 at 3:16 pm

    Another ridiculous case of the “Alice in Islamwonderland Syndrome “.Ridiculous beyond imagination…

  30. Right Is Right
    March 25, 2011 at 5:48 pm

    Rowan Williams should get rid of the mitre and don a turban, as he is obviously a crypto-Moslem who has successfully infiltrated the highest ranks of the Church of England. Hounds of hell are circling even at this writing, waiting hungrily for Williams’ appearance in the realm of his master Satan.

  31. greg_o
    March 25, 2011 at 6:13 pm

    Dude, your article and quotes are waaaay too long.

  32. Zak
    March 26, 2011 at 3:55 am

    Halal meat is already served in some Mcdonald’s and Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants in the USA.

    http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2007/01/fast_food_halal.html

    • eib
      March 26, 2011 at 5:39 am

      And if they do not mark such food as halal, then they are engaging in an act of deception.
      I think they should be prosecuted for deceptive marketing.
      They probably think that Christians in the U.S. are indifferent to this insult.
      And an insult it is.

  33. March 26, 2011 at 8:50 am

    Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury lies like a Muslim. The next thing he’s going to tell us is that Islam is the religion of peace. What’s wrong with crazies like Williams? Doesn’t he read the news and/or watch the news on TV? Does Williams have alzheimers? Or is he just drunk?

    The Muslims are not only murdering Christians all over the world, but each other. Witness what’s taking place in Egypt, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Iraq, in fact, in most backward Muslim Third World Countries. And the killing, killing, killing goes on in these Muslim Third World Countries in the name of the Muslim god Satan, sometimes called Allah.

    WE MUST DESTROY THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF ISLAM BEFORE THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF ISLAM DESTROYS US.

    • emmi
      March 27, 2011 at 11:17 am

      Quote ‘What’s wrong with crazies like Williams?’ Judge for yourself. When he first became archbishop he took a bowl and washed people’s feet. Reminded me of Nero fiddling while Rome burnt.

      • eib
        March 27, 2011 at 2:09 pm

        That particular ceremony is not listed in the Book of Common Prayer.

  34. March 26, 2011 at 8:56 am

    Rene, Rowan Williams isn’t a Catholic, i.e. a papist. Williams belongs to the Anglican Church.

  35. March 26, 2011 at 12:45 pm

    +Rowan is correct, as always. Shariah law requires that Christians in Islamic countries be treated as a protected minority. The problem with Islam is not Shariah, but its broad tolerance of hypocrisy. Provisions of Shariah are regularly set aside in favor of tribal and political interests. One can never trust Muslims to obey or enforce their own laws.

    • eib
      March 26, 2011 at 6:31 pm

      At what cost the protection?
      May I wear my rosary today?
      May I display a cross in my window?
      May I go to Mass?
      May I? May I? May I?
      Islam is intolerant.
      Period.

      • New Crusader
        March 29, 2011 at 10:29 am

        Muslim to eib:
        HIGH
        NO
        NO
        NO
        NO
        YES
        Period
        You are an insult to Islam. Any more blaspheme will cost you your life. Now get to work on your jizya.

        • eib
          March 29, 2011 at 4:31 pm

          To be called a blasphemer in terms of Islam is the highest compliment for a Christian.
          We must turn every advantage Muslims have taken into a stumbling block. In our world, St. Michael does indeed wield the sword, and does confront Satan directly.
          And in this world, Islam faces stresses it never faced before, events unprecedented in its history.
          Believe it or not, this reality is an advantage to us, if we are only willing to see it.

          • eib
            March 29, 2011 at 4:33 pm

            The West is truly Islam’s Vietnam.
            Here they will lose their resolve, question themselves, and eventually, they’ll have no choice but to tolerate pluralism.
            Islam’s hardness of heart, the hardness Mohammed commanded its adherents cultivate, assures its destruction from within.

          • New Crusader
            March 30, 2011 at 2:46 pm

            Hard to say what the future holds, but fight on every level we must. Thanks to Chris for the wake up this site gives us and to you for your contribution.

  36. March 28, 2011 at 11:54 pm

    the archbishop appears to be out of touch of reality… hope he gets on his meds soon… this is not the first asinine statement he has made…

  37. MAnderson
    March 29, 2011 at 11:34 pm

    He’s a fake! He is not Christian. Take a good look at him. You can see it if you look closely.
    I reckon he’s gay! He is definitely a fifth columnist.

  38. admin
    March 30, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    You’re welcome New Crusader, and thanks for the support. Keep up the good work!

    • New Crusader
      March 30, 2011 at 3:15 pm

      We live on opposite sides of the continent, but some day I’m going to shake your hand – over the exodus of islam

      • admin
        March 30, 2011 at 4:17 pm

        I look forward to that day NC!

  39. phil
    April 13, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    Rowan Wiliams was shortlisted by a prime from a selection process where there was the opportunity for direct party political influence and put forward to the head of state for rubber stamping in the expectation that he would not throw a spanner in the works of the EU meister plan He must has exceeded expectations. Not so long ago he was at the WEC in Davos gushing how honoured he felt to be in theit company and in turn honouring them with an English that was as pellucid for them as opaque it is when he is in the UK; except that it, for ‘shariah’, perhaps.
    The price to pay for an established church that has long had a problematic relationship to christianity.

  40. November 10, 2011 at 7:07 am

    Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m inspired! Extremely helpful info particularly the final part 🙂 I maintain such info much. I was looking for this certain info for a long time. Thanks and good luck.

  41. April 15, 2013 at 6:24 pm

    We found many great DVDs that him and i were excited to watch after again.

  42. April 15, 2013 at 10:37 pm

    Have you ever considered publishing an e-book
    or guest authoring on other websites? I have a
    blog centered on the same topics you discuss and would love to
    have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would enjoy your work.
    If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *