25 comments for “Russia: Video of Latest Islamic Homicide Attacks

  1. sickofit
    April 1, 2010 at 4:31 am

    Those animals need to be eradicated from the face of the Earth.

    • April 1, 2010 at 4:41 am

      Only a fool, or an arselifter, would dare argue with you.

  2. Robin Shadowes
    April 1, 2010 at 8:40 am

    We need to come up with a new virus that only attacks arselifters. Something with either pig or dog genes in it. And with no antidote. They had it coming anyway.

  3. desertscout
    April 1, 2010 at 4:20 pm

    My condolences to all the Russian people who have been hurt and adversely affected by the actions of this Satanic cult. May both uncles Medvedev and Putin find the perps and any of their direct supporters anywhere on the planet and make them pay dearly for this act of Islamic perfidy. Doom on the (death cult) ummah!!! Let them all reap the wrath for the actions of their 'sacred' martyrs, so called. This is truly 'Islam in Action.' 🙁

  4. April 1, 2010 at 9:46 pm

    I recently had an online debate with a professor of religion from a college in Chicago's northern suburbs. The debate stemmed from an article in a local paper back in December. I looked up the e-mail address at the school's website and proceeded to dialog for a few weeks. I asked him how he could teach that, as the interview with the reporter went, that all religions have their extreme elements and that jehad does not mean what we know it means – that it means a struggle in his view. But typical of the left, he used the Crusades as an instance of Christians murdering others at will. However, when asked to cite something much more recent from adherents of the Judeo-Christian faith and not to use the rare cases of Christians shooting abortionists, he didn't respond. I also sent him examples from DanielPipes.com how jehad was quoted by Muslims of old as meaning holy war and not struggle. That was the last I heard of Professor Ron Miller.

    • April 2, 2010 at 2:14 am

      Typical takiya from the left. The lie about the Crusades is typical. The Crusades were a defensive response to arselifter aggression. Here's at least one arselifter web site that admits it http://www.reformislam.org/

      You could also have asked him what violence was ever committed in the name of Buddhism. Or Taoist, or …

      • April 2, 2010 at 4:38 am

        I kinda did that, Gary (however, not on those specific religions), but once the pressure cooker began closing in on this guy, he "disappeared". And yeah, I am familiar with Reform Islam – the guy who runs it was a supporter of mine when I ran stoptheaclu.org. Gutsy individual.

        • April 2, 2010 at 5:59 am

          I doubt islam can be reformed. Its too much like a cult that doesn't allow dissent.

          • April 2, 2010 at 6:16 pm

            From the Koran.

            010.064
            YUSUFALI: For them are glad tidings, in the life of the present and in the Hereafter; no change can there be in the words of Allah. This is indeed the supreme felicity.

          • April 4, 2010 at 2:57 pm

            Also, I stand corrected on that website (Reform Islam). The Front Page Mag article is convincing. Thanks, Chris, for the heads up. Wish we could straighten out the FBI and others who believe that Islam is a peaceful religion

            — On Fri, 4/2/10, IntenseDebate Notifications <notifications@intensedebatemail.com> wrote:

          • April 4, 2010 at 5:44 pm

            That is a powerful article, thanks for reading it.

            The tide is slowly turning in our favor.

            Happy Easter to you and your family!

          • April 4, 2010 at 5:57 pm

            And a blessed Resurrection Sunday to you as well.

            — On Sun, 4/4/10, IntenseDebate Notifications <notifications@intensedebatemail.com> wrote:

        • April 2, 2010 at 7:09 pm

          He is not gutsy as he does not make public appearances, and resorts to gutter language when challenged. Him thinking that he can rewrite the Koran, and that the Islamic world will accept it is delusional. He also tries to sell people that Islam is not political, which is a flat-out lie.

          His nonsense was torn apart in this interview.

          Symposium: A New Koran?

          http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30658

          • April 4, 2010 at 3:17 pm

            I stand corrected as I noted in my other post, Chris. I don't see how Islam can change for the better, though I originally gave that guy a \”nice try\”. He was in my Stop the ACLU database so I though he was legit, despite my conviction that Islam is what it is. Maybe he was an infiltrator. Who knows?

            — On Fri, 4/2/10, IntenseDebate Notifications <notifications@intensedebatemail.com> wrote:

          • April 4, 2010 at 5:47 pm

            The Koran states that man cannot change the words in it.

            010.064
            YUSUFALI: For them are glad tidings, in the life of the present and in the Hereafter; no change can there be in the words of Allah. This is indeed the supreme felicity.

      • April 2, 2010 at 4:33 pm

        Please do not link to that site here. I have had many run ins with them, and their claim that they are going to rewrite the Koran. When you ask them which Mosques, or organizations will accept their Koran, they start cursing and insulting you. They are a fraud. Ali Sina said that they are only trying to get people to believe that "moderate" Muslims are coming to the rescue. They hang around non-Muslim sites all day, instead of Islamic ones. That shows they are fraud.

        Thanks.

        • April 3, 2010 at 11:50 am

          I thought it was too "good" to be true.

      • April 4, 2010 at 2:53 pm

        I agree with both of you, Chris & Gary. While I do still stand by my belief that the guy who runs the Reform Islam site is gutsy, in no way do I accept that Islam can be reformed. All Muslims are either hypocrites (because they don't believe the whole Koran) or terrorist (because they do). So in the end, the guy who runs that site will likely never see a change in Islam. It's been that way for 1300 years for a reason.

        Nedd

        — On Fri, 4/2/10, IntenseDebate Notifications <notifications@intensedebatemail.com> wrote:

    • April 2, 2010 at 6:31 pm

      Good work Nedd! What is funny is that he does not understand that his view of jihad does not matter. He does not get to dictate what Islam is.

  5. April 2, 2010 at 6:00 am

    And the payback begins!

    http://newsfromrussia.com/news/hotspots/29-03-201

    (I wonder if Pravda still means truth in Russian?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *