NAI Exclusive! Muslim Scholars’ “Anti-ISIS” Letter Undone ~ Part l

untitled (58)Back in 2010 the media was buzzing with the news of Islamic atrocities being committed, and Muslim propagandists were scrambling for an answer in an effort to combat the negative media attention. That “answer” came from Pakistani-born scholar Dr. Tahir ul-Qadri. The doctor issued his famous “Islam is Peace” fatwa and the world just ate it up, as the media did not even make an attempt to refute it. So I did their job for them. Now because the media is abuzz over the Muslim scholars’ statement “against” ISIS, I am forced to do it again. Our first warning sign should have been who released the letter in Washington. Muslim Scholars Release Open Letter To Islamic State Meticulously Blasting Its Ideology WASHINGTON (RNS) More than 120 Muslim scholars from around the world joined an open letter to the “fighters and followers” of the Islamic State, denouncing them as un-Islamic by using the most Islamic of terms. SNIP: RNS-MUSLIM-SCHOLARS SNIP:

Even translated into English, the letter will still sound alien to most Americans, said Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council of American-Islamic Relations, who released it in Washington with 10 other American Muslim religious and civil rights leaders. “The letter is written in Arabic. It is using heavy classical religious texts and classical religious scholars that ISIS has used to mobilize young people to join its forces,” said Awad, using one of the acronyms for the group. “This letter is not meant for a liberal audience.”

Even mainstream Muslims, he said, may find it difficult to understand. Awad said its aim is to offer a comprehensive Islamic refutation, “point-by-point,” to the philosophy of the Islamic State and the violence it has perpetrated. The letter’s authors include well-known religious and scholarly figures in the Muslim world, including Sheikh Shawqi Allam, the grand mufti of Egypt, and Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad Hussein, the mufti of Jerusalem and All Palestine.

For those new to the subject here is the main thing we need to know about the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). untitled (47) SNIP:

“Please stop calling them the ‘Islamic State,’ because they are not a state and they are not a religion,” said Ahmed Bedier, a Muslim and the president of United Voices of America, a nonprofit that encourages minority groups to engage in civic life. President Obama has made a similar point, referring to the Islamic State by one of its acronyms — “the group known as ISIL” — in his speech to the United Nations earlier Wednesday. In that speech, Obama also disconnected the group from Islam. Enumerating its atrocities — the mass rape of women, the gunning down of children, the starvation of religious minorities — Obama concluded: “No God condones this terror.”

Link to Article Unfortunately the Huffington Post is employing another “journalist” who has little to no knowledge on Islam. Because that statement by Obama was easily refuted. This time it is a Lauren Markoe, in the past I had exposed HuPo writer Craig Considine’s whitewashing of Mohammad. Now onto the letter:

1. It is forbidden in Islam to issue fatwas without all the necessary learning requirements. Even then fatwas must follow Islamic legal theory as defined in the Classical texts. It is also forbidden to cite a portion of a verse from the Qur’an—or part of a verse—to derive a ruling without looking at everything that the Qur’an and Hadith teach related to that matter. In other words, there are strict subjective and objective prerequisites for fatwas, and one cannot ‘cherry-pick’ Qur’anic verses for legal arguments without considering the entire Qur’an and Hadith. 2. It is forbidden in Islam to issue legal rulings about anything without mastery of the Arabic language. 3. It is forbidden in Islam to oversimplify Shari’ah matters and ignore established Islamic sciences. 4. It is permissible in Islam [for scholars] to differ on any matter, except those fundamentals of religion that all Muslims must know. 5. It is forbidden in Islam to ignore the reality of contemporary times when deriving legal rulings.

The reality is that the Koran is for all times and verse 33:21 states the actions of Mohammad on the battlefield are to be followed for all times. Koran 33:21: (Www. Altafsir.com)

{ لَّقَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ فِي رَسُولِ ٱللَّهِ أُسْوَةٌ حَسَنَةٌ لِّمَن كَانَ يَرْجُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَٱلْيَوْمَ ٱلآخِرَ وَذَكَرَ ٱللَّهَ كَثِيراً } Verily there is for you a good example (read iswa or uswa) in the Messenger of God, to emulate in combat and in holding one’s ground [therein], for whoever (li-man substitutes for lakum, ‘for you’) hopes for [the encounter with] God, fears Him, and the Last Day, and remembers God often, in contrast to those who do not.

Back to the letter.

6. It is forbidden in Islam to kill the innocent.

As you can see they do not define what “innocent” is, and according to Koran verse 9:29 if non-Muslims do not convert, pay jizya and accept Islamic rule, Muslims can wage war on them. Koran 9:29:

{ قَاتِلُواْ ٱلَّذِينَ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَلاَ بِٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلآخِرِ وَلاَ يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ وَلاَ يَدِينُونَ دِينَ ٱلْحَقِّ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ ٱلْكِتَابَ حَتَّىٰ يُعْطُواْ ٱلْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَاغِرُونَ } Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam.

In the following verse we see just how “innocent” is it to be a non-believer of Islam. Koran 4:89:

{ وَدُّواْ لَوْ تَكْفُرُونَ كَمَا كَفَرُواْ فَتَكُونُونَ سَوَآءً فَلاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ مِنْهُمْ أَوْلِيَآءَ حَتَّىٰ يُهَاجِرُواْ فِي سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ فَإِنْ تَوَلَّوْاْ فَخُذُوهُمْ وَٱقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيْثُ وَجَدتُّمُوهُمْ وَلاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ مِنْهُمْ وَلِيّاً وَلاَ نَصِيراً } They long, they wish, that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, so then you, and they, would be equal, in unbelief; therefore do not take friends from among them, associating with them, even if they should [outwardly] manifest belief, until they emigrate in the way of God, a proper emigration that would confirm their belief; then, if they turn away, and remain upon their ways, take them, as captives, and slay them wherever you find them; and do not take any of them as a patron, to associate with, or as a helper, to assist you against your enemy.

We move on….

7. It is forbidden in Islam to kill emissaries, ambassadors, and diplomats; hence it is forbidden to kill journalists and aid workers.

According to the following hadith, no one is safe from the wrath of Allah and Mohammad. Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25:

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”

Back to the Muslim misinformation machine:

8. Jihad in Islam is defensive war. It is not permissible without the right cause, the right purpose and without the right rules of conduct.

The verse I posted just above showed that jihad is more than a defensive war. There is also an offensive jihad, as proven in the Reliance of the Traveller. A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law. Which has the stamp of approval of Abd al-Wakil Durubi, Imam of the Mosque of Darwish Pasha Damascus, Syria, Nuh’ Ali Salman, Mufti of the Jordanian Armed Forces, International Institute of Islamic Thought (Having “American” council members), and Egypt’s world renowned Al Azhar University. Page 599, (Jihad means to wage war against non-Muslims and it etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.

9. It is forbidden in Islam to declare people non-Muslim unless he (or she) openly declares disbelief.

So Mohammad was going to interview them all before he drove them all out? securedownload

Update: Part 2 has been canceled for now, because no one could even formulate a sentence in an effort to refute Part 1.

Comments

comments

14 comments for “NAI Exclusive! Muslim Scholars’ “Anti-ISIS” Letter Undone ~ Part l

  1. al_kidya
    September 26, 2014 at 3:26 am

    I think the word is “mujahid” and not
    “mujahada”, isn’t it Chris?

    • September 27, 2014 at 12:52 pm

      Hey stranger!
      I just double checked. It is correct.
      Nice seeing you. 🙂

    • September 30, 2014 at 7:47 pm

      Isn’t it a difference of plural and singular? Like sharmuta/sharmeet, abd/abeed and kafr/kufar?

  2. Richard Landers
    September 26, 2014 at 4:22 am

    Actually, no such thing as “moderate” Muslims. Only those who do not fully implement the mandates of the faith. The Quran calls for exactly what ISIS is doing, which is no different than what Saladin did back in his day. Since the Quran is allegedly the very Word of God, it is not open to interpretation. Those who claim to be “moderate” Muslims refuse to condemn those passages in the Quran that provide the direction for what ISIS is doing. They also have been silent on Jihadist actions and ideology since 9/11 until now when it can no longer be ignored. Now they are worried (rightly so) about backlash against themselves in Western countries where they have settled and seek to mold into their own image rather than assimilate.

  3. Syed Iftekharuddin
    September 26, 2014 at 3:32 pm

    why white western christians converting to islam?

    let me tell you what is the REAL reason so many white western christians converting to islam

    1) trinity makes no sense

    2) christians turned to atheism or agnosticism

    3) without religion they enjoy materialism and sex with multiple partners

    4) bored with materialism and sex

    5) became depressed

    6) want to go back to religion for peace of mind

    7) christianity makes NO sense

    8) search all other religions except islam

    9) then studies islam

    10) found answer to their life long questions

    11) bow down to allah 

    holy trinity
    god the FATHER, god the SON, god the holy spirit

    whats makes FATHER and SON a male?

    do they have GENITALIA ?

    • September 26, 2014 at 8:34 pm

      There is only two reasons why white people reverts to pislam. Either they are white trash with little or no intelligence at all or they are like you. Psychopaths with no conscience for their fellow man or animal. People who with their new found faith can justify their own evil savage behaviour with some scriptures the followerrs claim is “holy”.

      • September 30, 2014 at 7:45 pm

        Reverts are eidiots, Bruce. Eidiots!

    • September 27, 2014 at 12:52 pm

      What is with the racism Syed?
      1, Ignorance.
      2. Angry at America. Many converts are prison converts.
      3. Islam allows a man to have four wives and take sex slaves. That is multiple sex partners.
      4. Let me know how they like when they are actually living under Islamic rule.

    • Kenneth William Gambill
      September 29, 2014 at 2:42 pm

      Syed,

      Your ignorance of Christianity is astounding, and made abundantly clear by the following statement ”
      whats makes FATHER and SON a male? do they have GENITALIA ?” Father and Son are male by having male attributes- beard, deep voice, male sex organs. That being said…Yes, Christ was male, and Yes God is Male because the masculinity is inferred by the adjective “He”.

      As for sex with multiple people and Materialism. I seriously doubt that Islam enforces a life of monogamy and pious poverty given the number wives a man is allowed to have and the number wealthy Muslims in the world. Also in most Islamic Countries it is permissible for a man to have sex with a man or even a Young boy (something we Westerners call pedophilia and avid prosecute in criminal courts). Secondly for Christianity is the Largest Religion in the world, You would see that Christianity is very satisfying to Most of the world except White Westerners who are disenfranchised with Western Culture and Western Religious values- by the way a great many of thse convert to other religions to…to include Paganism.

      Your facts are rhetorical statements of opinion paraded as “facts”. This is natural when a Muslim Fanatic tries to defend or justify the Superiority of Islam over other religions. So Syed let me ask you this. If Islam is so morally superior and so morally just.. why are Muslims killing Muslims and in faster rates than any Wetsren power can hope to achieve?

      • guest
        September 29, 2014 at 3:08 pm

        does your god have REAL son or just attributes?

    • September 30, 2014 at 7:44 pm

      It’s because reverts are eidiots and pislam is the perfect cult for eidiots.

  4. doktorzoom
    October 4, 2014 at 6:00 pm

    For what it’s worth, the “quote” that you attribute to Omar Ahmad comes from a 1998 article in the Fremont (CA) Argus, and in the original article, it is clearly a paraphrase, not a direct quote. For the sake of honesty, you should remove the quotation marks — those words are reporter Lisa Gardiner’s paraphrase of Ahmad’s remarks, and Ahmad insists he said nothing of the kind. Gardiner says that her paraphrase was accurate, but again, it was a paraphrase, not a direct quote. No recording exists of the event where Ahmad spoke.

    Ahmad continues to insist that it was an inaccurate summary of his views, and told WorldNetDaily in 2006 that “It is not my stance, it is not what I believe in.” While WND is no fan of CAIR, the article by Art Moore certainly provides an evenhanded discussion of the claims on either side. WND also recognizes that it was a paraphrase, not a quote.

    • October 4, 2014 at 6:34 pm

      The article claims he said it, and if you actually believe he does not want Islam to rule you are in serious denial. Friends of CAIR are no friends of America. You are on the wrong site.

      • October 14, 2014 at 5:08 am

        Even Anjem Choudarhead is openly saying that pislam will rule the world now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *