When it comes to Islam though I have to strongly disagree with his stance on the issue. As he promotes the “good” Muslim/bad Muslim policy. Which implies that so called moderate Muslims can save the West from Islam. Which has been a disastrous policy of false hope ever since 911.
Unfortunately today Ezra is still in the “good” Muslim/bad Muslim corner.
From an email I received from him earlier today:
For those who do not know, Raheel Raza is a Muslim board member of The Clarion Project. An organization that lives off of $elling false hope as it covers for Islam itself.
Raheel is a so called “reformer”. But when I had an email exchange with Clarion, they could not even explain how she is going to supposedly reform Islam. As proven here.
Onto Daniel Pipes:
Pipes’ message on this issue is actually dangerous. A 1400 year-old proven cultural suicide.
- The “historian” claims what he calls the threat of “militant Islam” is only about a century old. The Islamic conquests of Egypt and Persia alone prove him wrong.
- Pipes has come out against banning Islam. When I asked him on Twitter where respecting Islam as a religion is working out for the host non-Islamic country he ran off.
- Pipes has also stated that he actually respects Islam.
- Since at least 2004 Pipes’ “answer” to this threat has been “militant Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution”. Really Daniel? Where is this happening? Are there two Korans? A “moderate” and an extreme one? If so, produce them.
Like Raheel, Daniel $ells the West false hope. If their policies were so strong why do they run off when challenged on them?
So I will say it again. Islam cannot be protected as a religion, and defeated at the same time.
Ezra, for the sake of the future generations of the West, please stop promoting false hope on Islam.