Logan’s Warning Exclusive~ NY Muslims Boast of Peter King Beat Down!


I remember back in December when many of us anti-jihadists got excited when Peter King, Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee announced, he will be holding hearings on the “radicalization” of some American Muslims. But then in January that excitement quickly faded for many of us, as King stated he would not be calling Islam expert Robert Spencer, and the Investigative Project on Terrorism’s Steve Emerson as witnesses.

At that time it was said that Dutch critic of Islam, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and so called “moderate” Muslim Zuhdi Jasser were going to be possible witnesses in the hearings. Then February came and King stated he would not be calling Hirsi as well. He did go with Jasser though.

At that point it was clear to many of us that King had bowed to political pressure. In this exclusive Logan’s Waring report we will see just where that pressure came from. Having obtained the Winter Issue 2011 of NY Majlis In Focus pamphlet from a NY Mosque, we see how Muslims brazenly boast about handing Peter King a massive beat down!

(A delegation from the Majlis met with the federal government officials, U.S. Dept of Justice’s Community Relation Services regional director Reinaldo Rivera, Jr., 3rd from left, and next to him, U.S. Attorney, East District of New York, Ms. Loretta Lynch.)

A BRIEF REPORT

American Muslims Prevail in Rep. King’s Hearing

Alhamdulillah, Muslims prevailed and Rep. Peter King was not able to scapegoat Muslim community as he planned. He failed miserably in his plot to malign Islam and Muslims. There was a clear divide among members of the Homeland Security committee where all the democrats House of Representatives were against targeting or just singling out only American Muslims where as all Republicans spent their time and energy supporting the stand of Mr. Peter King reminding us of McCarthy era.

It has happened due to Alla’s blessing and the Muslim unity and the pressure from the Muslim community and from the faiths and civic groups.

You can see what unity and hard work by Muslims can bring to the reality.

* It was the pressure from the Muslims that made Rep. King defensive.

* It was the pressure from the Muslims, Peter King declined to invite top Islamophobes for the the hearings, like Steve Emerson, Robert Spenser, Pamela Geller, Denail Pipes, Walid Phares, Murtid Ayann Hirsi Ali. (Spelling is as in pamphlet)

* It was the efforts and hard work of the Muslims that Democratic Representatives on the Homeland Security Committee spoke in favor of American Muslims and criticized the narrow nature of the hearings.

* It was the strategy of the Muslims that Rep. Keith Ellison, Rep. Andre Carson, Rep. John Dingell and Rep. Al Green spoke in the defense of Muslims and against the hearings.

* It was the decision by the Muslim leadership on Jan. 9th in Washington D.C. that to try and release a letter “Dear Colleagues” against the hearings by 100 Congresspersons. The letter was signed by 52 Representatives and released to the news organizations.

* It was the Muslims’ collective efforts that brought different faith and conscience groups together on a national level.

SNIP

* The Majlis Ash-Shura (of Metropolitan New York) discussed the King’s announcement regarding hearings on Muslims in its meeting on December 15, 2010 then we developed an action plan in consultation with Muslim national organizations in a major meeting on Jan. 9th.

Stay tuned for part II. The plan and the future Islamic assault on the anti-jihad movement!

Please help Logan’s Warning continue to dig into the inner workings of these organizations. In an effort to expose their plots to spread the influence of Islam, in their attempt to make Islam untouchable. All donations can be made on the site via PayPal, or a check or money order can be sent to the following P.O. Box. Please make them out to “Christopher Logan”.

P.O. Box 313336
Jamaica, NY 11431

Thank you!

Comments

comments

12 comments for “Logan’s Warning Exclusive~ NY Muslims Boast of Peter King Beat Down!

  1. Hakim
    August 1, 2011 at 8:08 pm

    Murtid es someone who turns from Islam (punishment is what?) so that’s not a spelling error next to Hirsi Ali’s name

  2. proudtobeaninfidel
    August 1, 2011 at 9:31 pm

    Found this at this link

    http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?150454-Murtid

    Abu Mus’ab

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own world, deep in my own thoughts.

    Re: Murtid

    Quote Originally Posted by Muslimah_Pearl View Post
    Salam alikum to All

    I would like to know that what Islam says when a person divert from islam what should be done? what islam say about it? i mean ruling..

    fe aman ALLAH

    these people don’t even know what you’re talking about

    The proper spelling is “Murtad” a person commits irtidaad and becomes a murtad.

    Anyway the ruling is that he’s given 3 days to recant his kufr and become a muslim again, if he doesn’t accept islam then he is killed.

    And there is no difference of opinion about this.

    • eib
      August 3, 2011 at 4:00 pm

      Quote:
      Anyway the ruling is that he’s given 3 days to recant his kufr and become a muslim again, if he doesn’t accept islam then he is killed.
      end

      And we’re supposed to call Muslims civilized?
      Really?

  3. Adina Kutnicki, Israel
    August 2, 2011 at 2:58 am

    There is no way around it, King capitulated, he submitted to Islam as demanded by Islamists.

    The MOMENT he refused to bring in the big guns-Spencer & Emerson-is the moment he bowed to their dictates.

    One can’t put lipstick on a surrendering pig!!

  4. Tonto
    August 2, 2011 at 4:52 am

    The muz talk their sh*t all the time. However, the “soft crusade” is getting right in their knickers. Western thought infiltrating muz dominated areas really has the mullahs upset. That’s the reason that jihad attacks kill more muz than any other group. Think about that.

    • emmi
      August 4, 2011 at 2:11 am

      Well that’s good news then, Tonto. Always look on the bright side.

  5. tiffany
    August 4, 2011 at 4:19 am

    Personally, I can’t imagine not having have The Honorable Peter King have a hearing on Sharia Law alone. That would be a hoot! Really.

    • eib
      August 4, 2011 at 5:13 am

      I would love for the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold hearings on the precise content of Sharia and its constitutionality.
      And then I’d like their proceedings published and given to the public for download and/or purchase.
      In other words, I want the government to critique, in terms of American traditions, Sharia.
      I think Sharia should have no standing here whatsoever.
      It was not reached through decisions, precedents or reason. All Sharia amounts to is Arabic tradition codified. Nothing more.
      And the law = reason, not tradition.

  6. August 4, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    We need to remove those in congress who are trying to silence King, the Sheila Jackson Lees of congress, and the rest of the Pro muslims in Congress…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *