Member of U.S. Department of Energy Takes Stand for Islam on Logan’s Warning!

Just the other day we had a member of the Pakistani Government drop by to say hello, in an attempt to defend Islam. Today we are honored to have a guest from the U.S. Department of Energy. Unfortunately he is also here to try and cover for America’s internal threat of Islam.

New comment on your post “Why Islam is Taking Over America”
Author : DeucePrez (IP: 205.254.147.8 , doegate-1.doe.gov)
URL :
Whois : http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/205.254.147.8
Comment:
“Strangely enough, with Muslims representing a mere 2% of the U.S. population, Islam is NOT “taking over America”, but that’s what the Islamaphobes would have the ignorant to believe.”

As you can see “Deuce” is pro-Islamic. To make matters worse he is commenting from the U.S. Department of Energy.

Hostname: doegate-1.doe.gov
ISP: U.S. Department of Energy
Organization: U.S. Department of Energy
Proxy: Suspected network sharing device.

Type: Corporate
Assignment: Static IP
Blacklist:
Geolocation Information

Country: United States
State/Region: Maryland
City: Potomac
Latitude: 39.0274
Longitude: -77.2365
Area Code: 301

Wouldn’t it actually be helpful if members of our government were anti-Islamic?!

Comments

comments

81 comments for “Member of U.S. Department of Energy Takes Stand for Islam on Logan’s Warning!

  1. George
    May 2, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    Deuce is the Ignorant One!!! or a Dhimmi, but then it’s hard to tell the difference.

    • Roger Anderson
      May 2, 2011 at 3:21 pm

      If you do an internet search on this person you will find him all over the internet in support of islam/muslims. In one place he called Keith Ellison a brother and in another he is using islamic terms as only a muslim would do.

      • Roger Anderson
        May 2, 2011 at 3:22 pm

        It still makes him the ignorant one either way.

      • Roger Anderson
        May 2, 2011 at 3:28 pm
      • Khushi
        May 4, 2011 at 6:43 am

        This is political correctness taken to its extreme.
        Can he not see the havoc islam is wreaking on America’s freedom-of-speech and equality-of-gender principles?

      • DeucePrez
        August 17, 2011 at 3:57 am

        That’s funny!

        Even Islamaphobes use Islamic terms, bit they lack Islamic knowledge.

        At no point has anyone demonstrated the wrong in supporting law-abiding Muslim Americans!

        • admin
          August 17, 2011 at 4:06 am

          Then debate me. I’ll start. Islam allows lying, rape, and slavery.

          The wrong in supporting Islam in America, is that Muslims are using the laws of America against America to advance Sharia. Islam should have been banned during the Barbary Coast Wars.

        • Roger Anderson
          August 17, 2011 at 5:20 am

          What’s funny is how you can read a simple message and not have the ‘knowledge’ to understand what it said. That explains why you don’t understand whats wrong with the koran. Your understanding is corrupt and twisted.

          It has been pointed out numerous times here on this site what the problem is with supposed law abiding muslims but then again your ability to understand that is seriously lacking and twisted and it’s the reason that you are not able to debate the subject intelligently.

  2. New Crusader
    May 2, 2011 at 2:21 pm

    I guess math is not important in the Dept. of Energy; 2 becomes 4, 4 becomes 8, etc. Just as it has in Europe so it will be here. That is certainly the message from Europeans and unless we heed it, this will also be our fate. No wonder our government can’t run effectively on a budget.

    • kelly kafir
      May 3, 2011 at 9:39 am

      HAHAHA… Good one! You’re so right!

  3. Buck
    May 2, 2011 at 3:07 pm

    Why is he using a government computer to look at things on the web? Your tax dollars at work.

    • kelly kafir
      May 3, 2011 at 9:41 am

      Being a former military… I do believe that is a violation of his IT agreement he signed when he took the job… We had to sign one too. I think we should try to find his supervisor and get him fired! Not allowed to do this on gov computers. (unless that is your job to monitor websites)

      • AmericanMe
        May 3, 2011 at 7:41 pm

        Yes but they don’t have to abide by any co9ntract they sign and if you try and make them you will be sued by cair for being infringing on some obscure religious mandate that says they can do as they damn well please!

  4. admin
    May 2, 2011 at 4:38 pm

    From Roger Anderson.

    This is his FB page where it says he is a Sunni Muslim:
    https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109961314

    Here’s a page where he is arguing about Robert Spencer:
    http://msfrw.com/sean-hannity/robert-spencer-debates-islamic-supremacism-and-the-koran-with-mike-ghouse-on-the-hannity-show/

    There is a whole lot more out there too.

    • May 2, 2011 at 5:37 pm

      Why do we have Muslims in our Department of Energy??? Muslims, being our sworn enemy, and comprising only 2% of our population, should not be serving in government in any capacity… They are a member of the Cult of Islam, which is incompatible with the American Constitution and our system of laws.

    • Dan
      May 3, 2011 at 2:43 pm

      Great job Roger

  5. Skipping Girl
    May 3, 2011 at 2:37 am

    Admin: I think it is fantastic you are being contacted by these islamists. They are worried.

    Keep up the good work. So many people are waking up to the truth. Sites like this are changing the world slowly but surely.

    Thank you.

    • DeucePrez
      August 17, 2011 at 4:07 am

      Skippy girl:

      Um….no. I, for one, am not worried OR even concerned. I never knew this dud Logan existed until today (8/17/11)…. when he mentioned me in a Twitter post.

      But that’s what you get for ASSuming.

      Now skip back home and learn some truth about Islam to supplant the lies you’ve learned from Islamaphobes.

    • admin
      August 17, 2011 at 4:15 am

      You are welcome!

  6. Dan
    May 3, 2011 at 6:31 am

    Chris, if you keep making friends at this rate, how am I ever to keep up with my letter writing campaign?? Now I have to find time to track down his posts on all of these sites, the one’s that have the time stamp on them to show if “DuecePrez” may have been at work during that time I’ll have to copy and paste, then compose a “thank you” letter to the DOE to thank them for allowing one of their employee’s have so much free time, and the use of our tax payer purchased computer, to keep all of us “enlightened”, I’ll have to “explain” to them how “happy” we all are with the way they are using, (mis-using) our tax $’s.

    Oh well, I guess if you can research and write the articles,& maintain this excellent web site, the least I can do is continue to write “Thank-you” letters to all of your “new friends” with out complaining.

    On a more serious note, I have a meeting with another Pastor today. He is impressed with my Ministry and has much better computer skill’s than I. He’s going to help me work on the brochure I pass out when I speak. With your permission, we want to put a couple of quotes from LW and the LW web address on the back of the brochure. When its completed and printed I’ll send one to your PO Box.

    • admin
      May 3, 2011 at 1:55 pm

      LOL! You are doing an amazing job Dan! Please take what ever you want.

      I appreciate your support!

      Chris

  7. MikeTownsend
    May 3, 2011 at 12:08 pm

    More importantly, why is this government worker using a computer that we paid for, for purposes other than official business, and I’m sure on our time to boot? If he wants to comment and give his two cents, let it be from another computer my tax dollars didn’t pay for.

    • Buck
      May 5, 2011 at 12:06 pm

      I just fired off a letter to the DOE about this. (Go to the DOE website and click on Contact) I asked about the DOE policy reguarding computers and personal use.

      I doubt I will get a reply, but if I do not, then I write to my senators and representative. Paid by government tax dollars to troll sites like this? I do not think so.

      • Buck
        May 5, 2011 at 12:07 pm

        You can send an email to the Secretary of Energy
        at The.Secretary@hq.doe.gov

      • admin
        May 5, 2011 at 12:09 pm

        Thanks for pitching in Buck!

  8. Ron Rogers
    May 3, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    I hope I don’t change the subject too much…but what I get so tired of hearing is these muslim apologists breaking down islam to say it’s al-qaida or the the taliban only but not the beautiful religion of islam- BULLSHIT! People need to quit falling for the spin. And they want to say it’s just a few extremists? Yeah, in 57 muslim majority countries. Do the math folks.

    • Lord Tottenham
      May 5, 2011 at 1:06 am

      I have been listening to a lot of radio phone in shows here in the UK post Binliners death.I can’t help get the feeling that about 90% of the “moderate” Muslims who ring in are angry at the killing.You can hear it in their words,they say he is not dead,he is being held and tortured and even one saying that she comes from Abbotobad and a family of innocent people were killed by the US.
      There maybe only 2% now,but they breed like rabits and soon you will have a 5th column just like we have here in England and Europe.Well done to the US military for getting the evil bastard.

  9. May 4, 2011 at 1:39 am

    I think I have crossed swords this muzz apologist before myself on Facebook. I noticed his troll FB account has only 10 friends and some are obviously muzzies. All the groups he belongs to are groups that he would hate.

    Interestingly, I belong to some of those groups too. His account is typical of someone who is on a mission to destroy. He probably reports Infidels like me to FB all the time and tries to have them mass reported and deleted. He is proof that there is no such thing as a moderate muzzie.

    These people should not be allowed into positions of responsibility. Being a worshiper of a pedophile and mohammedan shows poor judgment.

  10. DeucePrez
    September 22, 2011 at 8:10 am

    Also funny…..an employ of a company/entity is a “member”? It’s not as if a person in the military posted and you claimed, “A member of the Navy….”

    In the military, one looses a degree of freedom of expression. I’d like to see just how long that lasts now that the DADT is gone and everyone seems to be “coming out” and getting married to their same-sex lovers now…. Anyway….

    As an employee of a government organization, we lose no such privileges. Oh….btw, when Pres. Obama took office, he allowed up the privilege of going to the social media.

    I KNOW that Islamaphobes HATE that!!

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 8:22 am

      You continually drop the term “Islamophobia”. It does not work here. Your so called religion calls for my dominance. Why don’t you explain what I am supposed to like about that?

  11. September 22, 2011 at 8:15 am

    MikeTownsend asked:

    More importantly, why is this government worker using a computer that we paid for, for purposes other than official business, and I’m sure on our time to boot? If he wants to comment and give his two cents, let it be from another computer my tax dollars didn’t pay for.

    Actually (and I’m glad that you had the sense to acknowledge that I was an EMPLOYEE…not “member” of the DOE), I was on a break. You’ve heard of those, right??

    Secondly, why are my and other U.S. citizens of good conscience tax dollars being paid to Islamaphobes who lie to law enforcement officials during “terrorist trainings”??

    Those law enforcement official now need to be re-educated and …. WE WANT OUR MONEY BACK!!

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 8:20 am

      Why don’t you “educate” me on Islam?

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 8:23 am

      Should non-Muslims who criticize Mohammad be killed? If you have a daughter would you allow her to have sex at the age of nine with a grown man?

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 8:23 am

      Point out their “lies”.

  12. September 22, 2011 at 8:26 am

    Logan:

    You need to align your “dictionary” with the truth. Your so-called definition of Islamaphobia is a far cry from the truth.

    Is.lam’a’.pho.bi.a: the irrational fear of Islam and/or anything related to Islam.

    One could truthfully expound on that definition by adding “the spreading of the irrational fear of Islam and/or anything related to Islam.

    That is, of course, part of how the paid Islamaphobes make their monies!! Of course the other devilish ingredient is lies. Lies mixed with the peddling of irrational fear.

    What a terrible mix.

    And do not mix up the truth with the falsehood, nor hide the truth while you know (it).
    – Holy Qur’an 2:42

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 8:29 am

      The truth is that non-Muslims suffer under Islamic rule, and we have every right to speak out against Islam.

      CAIR gets paid…..ISNA gets paid…..

      Point out the lies on your next post. Your word means nothing here.

    • September 22, 2011 at 8:41 am

      Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”

      Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

      Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

      Whoops, guess that makes me guilty of “hate speech” and being an islamaphobe, or a “racist” or “bigot”, although NO ONE has still been able to explain to me how islam is a race!

  13. September 22, 2011 at 8:29 am

    Isn’t it funny how quoting the Qu’ran or Hadith by a non-muslim is considered hate speach or Islamaphobia? Or quoting the stats provided by the State Dept. of an administration who refuses to use the term Islamic Terrorists makes one an Islamaphobe.

    Sunni extremists committed almost 60 percent of all worldwide terrorist attacks. These attacks caused approximately 70 percent of terrorism-related deaths, a significant increase from the almost 62 percent in 2009. The following noteworthy attacks are cataloged in WITS.
    Largest Sunni Extremist Attacks:

    On 4 April 2010, in the Mansur and Al Karkh districts of Baghdad, Iraq, three suicide bombers detonated VBIEDs near the Egyptian, German, and Iranian Embassies, killing a combined 42 people and wounding approximately 250 individuals. Police officers safely defused a fourth VBIED in the Karradah district. Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) claimed responsibility for all the attacks. ICN 201007393

    On 7 July 2010, in the northern ‘Azamiyah district of Baghdad, Iraq, a suicide bomber detonated an improvised explosive device (IED) near a group of Shia pilgrims making their way to the Imam Musa al-Kadhim shrine, killing between 29 and 48 pilgrims and several Sunni civilians and wounding between 133 and 315 pilgrims and several Sunni civilians. No group claimed responsibility, although the Islamic State of Iraq ISI was believed to be responsible. ICN 201012531
    Other Notable Sunni Extremist Attacks:

    On 1 January 2010, in a village in North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan, a suicide bomber detonated a VBIED at a volleyball game, killing 97 civilians, six soldiers, and two police officers. Another 100 civilians, three soldiers, and several children were wounded in the attack. No group claimed responsibility, although the Taliban was widely believed to be responsible. ICN 201000049

    On 11 July 2010, al-Shabaab conducted and claimed responsibility for its largest and most complex attack to date in Kampala, Uganda, killing 76 and wounding 114 civilians. ICN 201010950

    On 1 September 2010, assailants threw a grenade and two suicide bombers detonated IEDs targeting a Shia Muslim procession in Lahore, Pakistan, killing 40 and wounding 272. The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and Lashkar i Jhangvi both claimed responsibility. ICN 201014275

    In 2010, Sunni Muslims committed 60% of the 11,604 of the worldwide terrorist attacks that totaled 70% of the deaths! Not counting Shia’s or other Islamic Sects that means more than 9,230 deaths at the hands of ISLAMIC Terrorists.

    Those stats from President Obama’s state department make the case for even MORE terror training by “Islamaphobes”

    • September 22, 2011 at 9:17 am

      Rev.:

      Let’s assume that the stats you cited are accurate.

      I’ll go easy and ask for only one stat:

      What is the percentage of Sunni Muslims not involved, in any way, with such activity, worldwide?

      Now, if you had 60% of all Sunni Muslims involved in terrorism, then I’ll admit, there might be cause for alarm. But that wasn’t the statistic you cited. In fact, those numbers don’t even measure when compared to the number of Sunni Muslims worldwide.

      Further, its a foregone conclusion that Islamaphobes won’t give unbiased training to law enforcement officials in the realm of Islam or Muslims. They are given the opportunity to deceive them into aiding them (the Islamaphobe) in achieving their goals of attacking Islam and get paid for doing so in the process? It’s a win-win for the Islamaphobe!! If there’s any legal action from the Muslim or Muslim community against an officer or agency, the lying Islamaphobe has cashed his or her check and is long gone….on to deceive the next one!

      And your rationale for having biased trainers was what…..?

      • admin
        September 22, 2011 at 9:39 am

        The trainers were truthful. Islam itself is the problem.

        Again you drop the “Islamophobe” term. Explain what I am supposed to like about your so called religion that calls for my dominance. I will not ask you again….

      • September 22, 2011 at 9:44 am

        First I don’t agree with you about the definition of Islamaphobes. As I said merely quoting verses from the Qu’ran, Hadith, or quoting Sharia Law is enough to be labeled an Islamaphobe.

        Second in regard to your question about the state department stats, lets look at the Pew Research poll of Muslim Americans. When asked if there is support for terrorism in the American Muslim Community
        6% responded: A great deal of support. 15% responded A fair amount. 30% responded Not to much. 34% None at all. And 15% responded Don’t know.

        What do you see in this poll of Muslim Americans. Looks like more than a miniscule portion of Muslim Americans support terrorism, and American Muslims are suppossed to be some of the most moderate Muslims in the world!

      • New Crusader
        September 22, 2011 at 10:49 am

        “Now, if you had 60% of all Sunni Muslims involved in terrorism, then I’ll admit, there might be cause for alarm. But that wasn’t the statistic you cited. In fact, those numbers don’t even measure when compared to the number of Sunni Muslims worldwide.”

        All who pay Zakat are involved. All who support the qur’an. All who do not denounce the ways of mohammad and allah. All who refuse to integrate, but want a defiant cultural separation. All who fight for Shariah. All who push for Halal. All who talk a “moderate” talk but walk in the ways of allah and mohammad, are making a contribution to the hate from islam all over the world. That should be alarming enough.

  14. September 22, 2011 at 9:05 am

    “O ye who believe (in God and the last day and His revelations)! If a wicked person comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of repentance for what ye have done.”

       – Holy Qur’an 49:6

    • September 22, 2011 at 9:09 am

      2 John 1:7-11
      New International Version (NIV)

      7 I say this because many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist. 8 Watch out that you do not lose what we have worked for, but that you may be rewarded fully. 9 Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take them into your house or welcome them. 11 Anyone who welcomes them shares in their wicked work.

      • September 22, 2011 at 9:32 am

        Rev.:

        Quote the scripture in the NIV (or any such revision of the Bible) where Jesus states: “I am God“.

        I await your post.

        • September 22, 2011 at 10:13 am

          John 8:56-59
          New International Version (NIV)

          56 Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad.”

          57 “You are not yet fifty years old,” they said to him, “and you have seen Abraham!”

          58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” 59 At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds.

          John 10:30-33
          New International Version (NIV)

          30 I and the Father are one.”

          31 Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, 32 but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?”

          33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”

          John 13:12-14
          New International Version (NIV)

          12 When he had finished washing their feet, he put on his clothes and returned to his place. “Do you understand what I have done for you?” he asked them. 13 “You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and rightly so, for that is what I am. 14 Now that I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one another’s feet.

          John 14:6-9
          New International Version (NIV)

          6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you really know me, you will know[a] my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.”

          8 Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.”

          9 Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

          Need more? It never ceases to amaze me how Muslims call different Translations of The Holy Bible “Revisions” but the different translations of the unHoly Qu’ran are translations LOL!

          • September 22, 2011 at 5:29 pm

            Rev.:

            Jesus’ life was an example of how the Jews should have been living. No Muslim denied that.

            There is no such thing as an “unHoly Qur’an“; only the Holy Qur’an.

            Different people have translated the Holy Qur’an from its original Arabic into English, but if you’d taken any foreign language classes, you’d have known that not all words accurately translate with put into another language. Saying, “It’s raining” doesn’t quite translate in French, for example. But there is still one Holy Qur’an.

            Yes. I need more….particularly the verse I specifically asked for in the beginning….and still have not read!!

          • eib
            September 22, 2011 at 5:32 pm

            Quote:
            Yes. I need more….particularly the verse I specifically asked for in the beginning….and still have not read!!
            end

            The NT is holy in its totality, not just in one verse or another.
            And the Incarnation of Jesus is there.
            Foretold by more than 1000 years of prophecy in the OT.
            You follow the false prophet of the desert, the right hand of the Anti-Christ.
            We don’t have to tell you anything.

          • eib
            September 22, 2011 at 5:34 pm

            Quote:
            Different people have translated the Holy Qur’an from its original Arabic into English, but if you’d taken any foreign language classes, you’d have known that not all words accurately translate with put into another language.
            end

            So how does “Lazarus, come forth!” translate?
            Oh, that’s right.
            It was revised.

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 9:10 am

      You still have not answered my question, and your verse does not make 9:29 disappear. Koran verse 33:50, Mohammad took sex slaves. That is rape. Do you have the moral courage to condemn him?

      • September 22, 2011 at 9:21 am

        Do you have the moral fortitude to condone his many good actions?

        You haven’t answered any of my questions either!! I owe you nothing!!

        Any fool can cherry-pick from any book of scripture without understanding to condemn any faith.

        • admin
          September 22, 2011 at 9:37 am

          I have addressed your posts. Rape over rides everything. He deserves no respect, and you are a moral coward.

          I clearly understand. Right hand possess, means sex slaves.

        • admin
          September 22, 2011 at 9:41 am

          Do you care if the female non-Muslim members of your family are taken as sex slaves by Muslims?

          Would you allow a 9 year-old daughter to have sex with a grown man?

        • admin
          September 22, 2011 at 9:44 am

          You are either going to show some respect here, or you will not post here. Is that clear enough?

          • September 22, 2011 at 5:31 pm

            Why do you think that I should show you so much respect when you’re barely capable of spelling the word, let alone showing me respect by simply not lying about Islam?

          • admin
            September 22, 2011 at 5:40 pm

            Yet you never point out the lies…..your childish insults show just how weak your argument is.

          • admin
            September 22, 2011 at 5:40 pm

            Good work on ducking the questions pedophile supporter.

        • admin
          September 22, 2011 at 9:53 am

          Mohammad was OK with his men raping women and possibly impregnating them.

          Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:
          Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

          I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and
          we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”

          http://loganswarning.com/2010/03/20/islam-101-the-religion-of-rape/

          This is what Deuce supports.

          • admin
            September 22, 2011 at 6:16 pm

            No surprise that Deuce ducks this comment.

        • eib
          September 22, 2011 at 10:30 am

          Quote:
          Do you have the moral fortitude to condone his many good actions?
          end

          What good actions?
          Marrying an older woman to get ahead?
          Marrying a small child to …?
          The mass murder of non-Muslims?
          The compulsion of Islam?

          • September 22, 2011 at 5:34 pm

            Your ignorance does not astound me. I’ve seen the same garbage regurgitated from other parrots before you.

               – member, Dept. of Energy

            LOL

          • admin
            September 22, 2011 at 5:38 pm

            Another comment that proves nothing. We are done slave to Allah.

    • eib
      September 22, 2011 at 12:09 pm

      Quote:
      The Golden Rule
      12 “So ewhatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is fthe Law and the Prophets.

      13 g“Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy1 that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. 14 For the gate is narrow and hthe way is hard that leads to life, and ithose who find it are few.

      A Tree and Its Fruit
      15 j“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are kravenous wolves. 16 You will recognize them lby their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 So, mevery healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. 19 nEvery tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus you will recognize them lby their fruits.

      I Never Knew You
      21 o“Not everyone who psays to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will qenter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who rdoes the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 sOn that day tmany will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not uprophesy in your name, and cast out demons vin your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 tAnd then will I declare to them, ‘I wnever knew you; xdepart from me, yyou workers of lawlessness.’

      Build Your House on the Rock
      24 z“Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like aa wise man who built his house on the rock. 25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock. 26 And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like aa foolish man who built his house on the sand. 27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.”

      The Authority of Jesus
      28 And when Jesus finished these sayings, bthe crowds were astonished at his teaching, 29 cfor he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.

      end

      http://www.esvbible.org/Matthew+7/

      • eib
        September 22, 2011 at 12:14 pm

        False Prophets.* 15“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves. 16l By their fruits you will know them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17Just so, every good tree bears good fruit, and a rotten tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree bear good fruit. 19Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 So by their fruits you will know them.

        The True Disciple. 21“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven,* but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.n 22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name? Did we not drive out demons in your name? Did we not do mighty deeds in your name?’ 23Then I will declare to them solemnly, ‘I never knew you.* Depart from me, you evildoers.’

        Islam is profane.
        Mohammed is a false prophet.
        Allah is a spirit of the world.

        • New Crusader
          September 22, 2011 at 1:07 pm

          allah is the fallen angel Hell was made for. The Prince of the power of the air.

        • September 22, 2011 at 5:35 pm

          And you truly know nothing about Islam.

          • admin
            September 22, 2011 at 5:38 pm

            Yet ANOTHER empty comment with NO proof.

  15. September 22, 2011 at 9:29 am

    Ok…. I see that you’re having some mental issues. I’ll be nice & help you with this one:

    Fight those who believe not in Allah (God) nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah (God) and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued..”

       – Holy Qur’an 9:29

    Those who didn’t believe in God were attacking the Muslims. It says nothing about Muslims being the aggressors. Here, the Muslims are given instructions as to what to do with these people.

    Was that REALLY so hard for you to figure out…..??!!

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 9:35 am

      Sorry Deuce, it is part of Islamic Law. From an Islamic Law manual approved by the scholars of Al-Azhar. The world’s highest Islamic learning school.

      http://loganswarning.com/2010/08/26/sharia-law-islamic-law-101-non-muslims-under-sharia/

      When you know more about Islam than those scholars let me know. Why don’t you come and try and force it on some of “these people”?

      • September 22, 2011 at 5:39 pm

        Force? That’s interesting.

        I’m only countering the lies….like “member of the Dept. of Energy” and that which Islamaphobes babble against Islam.

        It’s up to the reader to do their own research so that they may discern the truth from your lies.

        • admin
          September 22, 2011 at 5:42 pm

          That what the verse says. You have countered nothing. I have every IP address you have posted from, that is where one went back to. A call will be placed there tomorrow Maryland.

          • Roger Anderson
            September 22, 2011 at 6:01 pm

            Don’t you just love it when a muslim admits the koran is full of lies.

    • admin
      September 22, 2011 at 9:46 am

      “The Christians of Najran, Medina, refused conversion to Islam in 631 A.D. and offered Mohamad to maintain their faith, accept the dominance of Muslims and pay an annual tribute (the jizya), he accepted and the pact was sealed between them.”

      • September 22, 2011 at 5:41 pm

        Wait.

        They paid taxes and the Muslims defended them against enemies?

        Wow….! Sounds like U.S. citizens and their military.

        • admin
          September 22, 2011 at 5:45 pm

          They were forced to pay “taxes” for less rights. My link proved that.

        • eib
          September 22, 2011 at 5:46 pm

          The Muslims defended them against nothing.
          They forced them to wear the zunnar.
          Then they systematically targeted them for humiliation, theft, rape, and murder.
          That is the protection of Islam– so unprotective that people were compelled to convert.
          So much for no compulsion in religion.
          Another Muslim lie.

      • eib
        September 22, 2011 at 5:45 pm

        1480:
        Quote:
        On August 14, 1480, a massacre was perpetrated on a hill just outside the city of Otranto, in southern Italy. Eight hundred of the city’s male inhabitants were taken to a place called the Hill of the Minerva, and, one by one, beheaded in full view of their fellow prisoners. The spot forever after became known as the Hill of the Martyrs.

        The people of Otranto faced the same end as the Christians of Constantinople. All of the men over the age of 50 were slaughtered; the women and children under the age of 15 were either slain or sent away to Albania to be slaves. According to some contemporary sources, the total number of dead was as high as 12,000, with another 5,000 pressed into slavery. (These numbers are almost certainly an exaggeration as Otranto did not likely have a population that high.) Nevertheless, worse was still to come.

        At this, the men of Otranto cried out with one voice that they too were willing to die a thousand times for Christ. The angry Pasha Ahmed pronounced his sentence: death.

        The next morning, August 14, the 800 prisoners were bound together with ropes and led out of the still-smoking battleground of Otranto and up the Hill of Minerva. The victims repeated their pledge to be faithful to Christ, and the Ottomans chose the courageous Antonio Primaldo as the first to be executed.

        The old tailor gave one final exhortation to his fellow prisoners and knelt before the executioner. The blade fell and decapitated him, but then, as the chronicler Saverio de Marco claimed in the Compendiosa istoria degli ottocento martiri otrantini (“The Brief History of the 800 Martyrs of Otranto”), the headless corpse stood back upright. The body supposedly proved unmovable, so it remained standing for the entire duration of the gruesome executions. Stunned by this apparent miracle, one of the executioners converted on the spot and was immediately killed. The executioners then returned to their horrendous business. The bodies were placed into a mass grave, and the Turks prepared to begin their march up the peninsula toward Rome. Otranto was in ruins, its population gone, its men dead and thrown into a pit, seemingly to be forgotten.
        end
        http://archive.catholic.com/thisrock/2008/0807fea2.asp

        800 men slaughtered because they would not submit.
        Islam is profane.
        Mohammed is a false prophet.
        Allah is a spirit of the earth– and will perish.
        Your Allah created and creates nothing.
        He commands you to destroy.
        And then you ask why we curse your faith?

    • eib
      September 22, 2011 at 12:07 pm

      The Second Commandment (which Muslims claim binds them) says Thou shalt not kill.
      Fight.
      Slaughter.
      Kill.
      Humiliate.
      These are the commands of Islam.
      They all abrogate the Golden Rule and 10 Commandments.
      These commands belong to the devil, who lies and despises humanity.
      The devil you have willingly embraced.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *