East Bay Congressman Eric Swalwell Vs. Logan’s Warning

Rep Swalwell picHypocrisy at its finest!

Some people just do not know when to mind their own business, and today we see an example of this in East Bay Congressman Eric Swalwell. Serving Islam out of California’s 15th congressional district (D). Recently I had noticed that he had followed in the footsteps of his leader Obama, and held a meeting with The Muslim Public…errr…Propaganda Affairs Council, otherwise known as MPAC.

(Click on images to enlarge.)

MPAC and Rep 1

MPAC and Rep 2
For those who do not know, MPAC is part of the Muslim Fifth Column within America, and they play by no rules. Having the audacity to attempt to brainwash our children into believing Islam is no threat to non-Muslims, females, and animals.

Besides that immoral action, they have even met with the enemies of America. The Muslim Brotherhood! So either the Congressman did not do his homework, or he sadly just did not care.

After monitoring the MPAC page I decided to take a look at Swalwell’s page and noticed the following.

Rep Swalwell 2


Then it hit me. All of these politicians who claim they support America’s great troops, and Islam at the same time are being hypocritical. Because our troops are being slain in the name of Islam!

But the Congressman does not care. He is such an Islamophile that he even has Muslim interns.

MPAC and Rep 3

So I decided to call the Congressman out on it.

His response was a weak one, as the best he could do is call me ignorant. Which of course he never proved.

Rep Swalwell 1

Well actually he never said anything else, as he wisely tucked his tail between his legs and ran away.

Rep Swalwell 3
Rep Swalwell 4

As you can see, he did not even have the courage to condemn Islam for allowing child marriages, lashings, and sex slavery. Mohammad got his tongue…

Logan’s Warning to Hirsi Ali: Waiting for Islam to Reform is a Death Sentence Pt. lll

Fact vs fiction
As we left off in part II of “Logan’s Warning to Hirsi Ali: Waiting for Islam to Reform is a Death Sentence”, Ali failed to identify the main threat of Islam. The lawful jihad that is taking place across the West, a jihad that is changing the West to suit Islam. Which has ushered in numerous aspects of Sharia, such as Sharia banking, Sharia Courts, halal only in over 50 UK public schools, and the Islamic call to prayer (adhan) being broadcast onto the streets with no concern for the wants and beliefs of non-Muslims, etc.

Her completely ignoring this threat raises a red flag to me, as does her reluctance to want Muslims deported from non-Islamic countries.

Now back to her attempting to mislead the public into believing that she, a self pro-claimed apostate of Islam can not only categorize Muslims, but can actually split Mohammad into two. In an effort to get Muslims to ignore the tyrannical tendencies within in him.



Yet the Mecca Muslims have a problem: Their religious beliefs exist in an uneasy tension with modernity—the complex of economic, cultural and political innovations that not only reshaped the Western world but also dramatically transformed the developing world as the West exported it. The rational, secular and individualistic values of modernity are fundamentally corrosive of traditional societies, especially hierarchies based on gender, age and inherited status.

Trapped between two worlds of belief and experience, these Muslims are engaged in a daily struggle to adhere to Islam in the context of a society that challenges their values and beliefs at every turn. Many are able to resolve this tension only by withdrawing into self-enclosed (and increasingly self-governing) enclaves. This is called cocooning, a practice whereby Muslim immigrants attempt to wall off outside influences, permitting only an Islamic education for their children and disengaging from the wider non-Muslim community.

It is my hope to engage this second group of Muslims—those closer to Mecca than to Medina—in a dialogue about the meaning and practice of their faith. I recognize that these Muslims are not likely to heed a call for doctrinal reformation from someone they regard as an apostate and infidel. But they may reconsider if I can persuade them to think of me not as an apostate but as a heretic: one of a growing number of people born into Islam who have sought to think critically about the faith we were raised in. It is with this third group—only a few of whom have left Islam altogether—that I would now identify myself.

Why would Muslims even begin to care what a so-called apostate of Islam wants when it comes to Islam? According to the Koran she is deaf, dumb, and blind.

Koran 2:171:

{ وَمَثَلُ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ كَمَثَلِ ٱلَّذِي يَنْعِقُ بِمَا لاَ يَسْمَعُ إِلاَّ دُعَآءً وَنِدَآءً صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ }

The likeness, the attribute, of those who disbelieve, and the one who calls them to guidance, is as the likeness of one who shouts to that which hears nothing, save a call and a cry, only a sound, not understanding its meaning: when they listen to an admonition they are like cattle that hear the cry of their shepherd but do not understand what he is saying; they are deaf, dumb, blind — they do not comprehend, any admonition.

Back to Hirsi: (SNIP)

For the world at large, the only viable strategy for containing the threat posed by the Medina Muslims is to side with the dissidents and reformers and to help them to do two things: first, identify and repudiate those parts of Muhammad’s legacy that summon Muslims to intolerance and war, and second, persuade the great majority of believers—the Mecca Muslims—to accept this change.

Who does that? Even America’s “moderate” Muslim poster boy Zuhdi Jasser will not condemn Mohammad.

What Hirsi fails to understand is that she does not get even begin to dictate what Islam is. The Koran does that, and it does not say to ignore any part of Mohammad’s life. In fact it highly praises the him.

Koran 21:107:

{ وَمَآ أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلاَّ رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَالَمِينَ }

We did not send you, O Muhammad (s), except as a mercy, that is, to [give] mercy, to all the worlds, [the worlds of] mankind and jinn through you.
Koran 68:04:

{ وَإِنَّكَ لَعَلَىٰ خُلُقٍ عَظِيمٍ }

And assuredly you possess a magnificent nature, [a magnificent] religion.

The fact is that Mohammad was both Mecca and Medina, not a half of person. Should the world have ignored the tyrannical murderous Hitler and only look back to when he was a harmless child? Of course not, doing so would only whitewash the threat of Nazism.

Not only does the Koran praise Mohammad, it actually says to follow his actions on the battlefield for all times. Which includes beheadings and the taking of sex slaves.

Koran 33:21:

{ لَّقَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ فِي رَسُولِ ٱللَّهِ أُسْوَةٌ حَسَنَةٌ لِّمَن كَانَ يَرْجُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَٱلْيَوْمَ ٱلآخِرَ وَذَكَرَ ٱللَّهَ كَثِيراً }

Verily there is for you a good example (read iswa or uswa) in the Messenger of God, to emulate in combat and in holding one’s ground [therein], for whoever (li-man substitutes for lakum, ‘for you’) hopes for [the encounter with] God, fears Him, and the Last Day, and remembers God often, in contrast to those who do not.

Believing in the notion that Ali has some kind of say in Islam, is believing in nothing more than false hope.


Islam is at a crossroads. Muslims need to make a conscious decision to confront, debate and ultimately reject the violent elements within their religion. To some extent—not least because of widespread revulsion at the atrocities of Islamic State, al Qaeda and the rest—this process has already begun. But it needs leadership from the dissidents, and they in turn stand no chance without support from the West.

Ever since 911 the main policy of Western governments and the media on this issue, has been to empower “the moderate” Muslims. As if they will create a some form of a “good” Islam that will save Western Civilization from the “bad” Islam. Well in fact, not only as that policy failed. It is has completely backfired by empowering Islam and allowing aspects of Sharia into our societies.

So I am absolutely not interested in legitimizing Islam in anyway. Doing so is nothing more than a slow suicide.

(Dr. Kevorkian)

Dr. K suicide


I have identified five precepts central to Islam that have made it resistant to historical change and adaptation. Only when the harmfulness of these ideas are recognized and they are repudiated will a true Muslim Reformation have been achieved.

Here are the five areas that require amendment:

1. Muhammad’s semi-divine status, along with the literalist reading of the Quran.

Muhammad should not be seen as infallible, let alone as a source of divine writ. He should be seen as a historical figure who united the Arab tribes in a premodern context that cannot be replicated in the 21st century. And although Islam maintains that the Quran is the literal word of Allah, it is, in historical reality, a book that was shaped by human hands. Large parts of the Quran simply reflect the tribal values of the 7th-century Arabian context from which it emerged. The Quran’s eternal spiritual values must be separated from the cultural accidents of the place and time of its birth.

But he is. In the Islamic world there is a saying “al-Insān al-Kāmil”, which is used to describe Mohammad as the perfect man. The reality is that Apostate Ali does not get to change that.

2. The supremacy of life after death.

The appeal of martyrdom will fade only when Muslims assign a greater value to the rewards of this life than to those promised in the hereafter.

But the Koran clearly states that the hereafter will be a paradise for Muslims.

Koran 9:72:

{ وَعَدَ ٱللَّهُ ٱلْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَٱلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي مِن تَحْتِهَا ٱلأَنْهَارُ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا وَمَسَاكِنَ طَيِّبَةً فِي جَنَّاتِ عَدْنٍ وَرِضْوَانٌ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ أَكْبَرُ ذٰلِكَ هُوَ ٱلْفَوْزُ ٱلْعَظِيمُ }

God has promised the believers, both men and women, Gardens underneath which rivers flow, to abide therein, and blessed dwellings in the Gardens of Eden, for residence, and beatitude from God is greater, is superior to all of that. That is the supreme triumph.

Koran 13:23:

{ جَنَّاتُ عَدْنٍ يَدْخُلُونَهَا وَمَنْ صَلَحَ مِنْ آبَائِهِمْ وَأَزْوَاجِهِمْ وَذُرِّيَّاتِهِمْ وَالمَلاَئِكَةُ يَدْخُلُونَ عَلَيْهِمْ مِّن كُلِّ بَابٍ }

Gardens of Eden, as a [place of] residence, which they shall enter, they, along with those who were righteous, [those who] believed, from among their fathers and their spouses and their descendants, even if these [latter] did not perform deeds of the same [merit] as theirs, they shall share with them their stations [of Paradise] as an honouring for them; and the angels shall enter to them from every gate, of the gates of Paradise or of [the gates of] the palaces [of Paradise], when they first enter, in order to congratulate them.


3. Shariah, the vast body of religious legislation.

Muslims should learn to put the dynamic, evolving laws made by human beings above those aspects of Shariah that are violent, intolerant or anachronistic.

Yes they should. But once again, why would enough of the ummah (Muslim body, or nation) listen to the words of Apostate Ali? Does she has more say than Egypt’s world renowned Al Azhar University, which gives it stamp of approval to the barbaric Islamic Law manual, The Reliance of the Traveller? Of course not. Talk about dangerous wishful thinking.

4. The right of individual Muslims to enforce Islamic law.

There is no room in the modern world for religious police, vigilantes and politically empowered clerics.

That sounds nice, but it is once again ignoring what Muslims believe to be the word of God himself. As Islam is certainly political, and the Koran calls for Muslims to stand with Islam above all.

Koran 4:59:

{ يَا أَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ أَطِيعُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُواْ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُوْلِي ٱلأَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ فَإِن تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلآخِرِ ذٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلاً }

O you who believe, obey God, and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you, that is, rulers, when they command you to obey God and His Messenger. If you should quarrel, disagree, about anything, refer it to God, that is, to His Book, and the Messenger, while he lives, and thereafter [refer] to his Sunna: in other words examine these [disputes] with reference to these two [sources], if you believe in God and the Last Day; that, reference to the two [sources], is better, for you than quarrelling or [adhering to] personal opinions, and more excellent in interpretation, in the end.


5. The imperative to wage jihad, or holy war.

Islam must become a true religion of peace, which means rejecting the imposition of religion by the sword.

Well why would Muslims go against Allah, and what they believe to be the perfect man? Because a hated infidel is asking them to? That is the equivalent of a Jew asking a Nazi to stand with them over Nazism.

Koran 9:73:

{ يٰأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّبِيُّ جَاهِدِ ٱلْكُفَّارَ وَٱلْمُنَافِقِينَ وَٱغْلُظْ عَلَيْهِمْ وَمَأْوَاهُمْ جَهَنَّمُ وَبِئْسَ ٱلْمَصِيرُ }

O Prophet, struggle against the disbelievers, with the sword, and the hypocrites, with words and [definitive] arguments, and be harsh with them, through rebuke and aversion [towards them]; for their abode will be Hell, an evil journey’s end, [an evil] resort it is!

islamic sword

From the world renowned Sahih (authentic Bukhari Ahadith).

Volume 1, Book 2, Number 25:

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”

Now whose words are held higher across the Islamic world? Allah and his so called perfect prophet Mohammad, or those of Apostate Ali?

Hirsi Ali, $elling America a fantasy one book at a time….

Coming up on Logan’s Warning: An Apostate, a Hypocrite, and a Lesbian Walk Into a Mosque….

Logan’s Warning to Hirsi Ali: Waiting for Islam to Reform is a Death Sentence Pt. ll

Death sentenceSome of the main reasons we are losing the war with Islam is because of the lack of will to stop respecting it as a religion. The lack of will to drive it from America (or other non-Islamic countries, in a non-violent manner), and finally the non-Muslim need to believe in the fantasy that Islam will reform into an ideology that is non-Muslim friendly. Or something”peaceful” as Hirsi Ali puts it.

Reason: Don’t you mean defeating radical Islam?

Hirsi Ali: No. Islam, period. Once it’s defeated, it can mutate into something peaceful. It’s very difficult to even talk about peace now. They’re not interested in peace.

Not only is the belief that Islam will reform a fantasy, it is one of the most detrimental messages going today across the West. Promoted by prominent names such as Hirsi Ali, Frank Gaffney, and misleadingly supported by media personalities such as Sean Hannity, with his consistent promoting of Zuhdi Jasser. Adding to it, Megyn Kelly, being seemingly mesmerized by the UK’s so called “moderate” Muslim poster boy, Quilliam’s co-founder Maajid Nawaz.

This is exactly why I feel it is my duty to strongly counter their message of “reforming” Islam. So tonight I continue with part ll of Logan’s Warning to Hirsi Ali: Waiting for Islam to Reform is a Death Sentence.

No Islam 2

Hirsi follows the failed policy of attempting to categorize Muslims:

In the early days of Islam, when Muhammad was going from door to door in Mecca trying to persuade the polytheists to abandon their idols of worship, he was inviting them to accept that there was no god but Allah and that he was Allah’s messenger.

After 10 years of trying this kind of persuasion, however, he and his small band of believers went to Medina, and from that moment, Muhammad’s mission took on a political dimension. Unbelievers were still invited to submit to Allah, but after Medina, they were attacked if they refused. If defeated, they were given the option to convert or to die. (Jews and Christians could retain their faith if they submitted to paying a special tax.)

No symbol represents the soul of Islam more than the Shahada. But today there is a contest within Islam for the ownership of that symbol. Who owns the Shahada? Is it those Muslims who want to emphasize Muhammad’s years in Mecca or those who are inspired by his conquests after Medina? On this basis, I believe that we can distinguish three different groups of Muslims.

The first group is the most problematic. These are the fundamentalists who, when they say the Shahada, mean: “We must live by the strict letter of our creed.” They envision a regime based on Shariah, Islamic religious law. They argue for an Islam largely or completely unchanged from its original seventh-century version. What is more, they take it as a requirement of their faith that they impose it on everyone else.

I shall call them Medina Muslims, in that they see the forcible imposition of Shariah as their religious duty. They aim not just to obey Muhammad’s teaching but also to emulate his warlike conduct after his move to Medina. Even if they do not themselves engage in violence, they do not hesitate to condone it.

It is Medina Muslims who call Jews and Christians “pigs and monkeys.” It is Medina Muslims who prescribe death for the crime of apostasy, death by stoning for adultery and hanging for homosexuality. It is Medina Muslims who put women in burqas and beat them if they leave their homes alone or if they are improperly veiled.

The second group—and the clear majority throughout the Muslim world—consists of Muslims who are loyal to the core creed and worship devoutly but are not inclined to practice violence. I call them Mecca Muslims. Like devout Christians or Jews who attend religious services every day and abide by religious rules in what they eat and wear, Mecca Muslims focus on religious observance. I was born in Somalia and raised as a Mecca Muslim. So were the majority of Muslims from Casablanca to Jakarta.

Sorry Ali, but you are greatly mistaken. Both groups are highly problematic. That is because Islam strikes as a two-tiered threat. The first being the violent aspect of Islam, the second being the stealth jihad that is taking place across the West. Or what I like to call the insidious threat of Islam. Which is far more dangerous than the violent aspect of Islam, and being that you were in Europe for so long I find it hard to believe that you do not see this. But then again, you are also against deporting Muslims….

That is besides the fact Apostate Ali does not have any say in the ummah (Muslim nation) at all. So her attempting to categorize Muslims is just an exercise in futility. It reminds of when people who are new to this subject point out that there are Sunni and Shias. As if their differences effect us at all. They don’t. Both groups want to dominate non-Muslims.

Coming up next: Apostate Ali’s five point plan is shown to be nothing more than wishful thinking.



Logan’s Warning to Hirsi Ali: Waiting for Islam to Reform is a Death Sentence Pt. 1

Hirsi AliBefore I get to the heart of this article, I just want to make it clear that I have a world of respect for Hirsi Ali for finding the strength to leave Islam, her tireless work against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), and attempting to rescue others from the cult of hate.

But like many prominent names in this field, she has no real long term answers in order to win the war with Islam. She also seems to have some kind of emotional attachment to Islam as well. One that does not bode well for the West, and that is the reason I write articles like this. Because most of the so called leaders in this war, are taking us down the road to an Islamic hell.

When I first got the idea to write this article it was because of her call to reform Islam. But while doing my homework I disappointedly discovered that many of her other policies actually empower Islam.

1. As you will see in the following video, not only is she against banning Islam, she is also against banning the burqa. Which just leads to other aspects of Sharia seeping into non-Islamic communities.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Banning the Burqa Misses the… by FORAtv

Besides taking a stand for the burqa, she approves of Muslims praying five times a day. Even though the Islamic prayer itself preaches hatred against Christians and Jews.

She even called the birthplace of Islam beautiful.

Reason: In Infidel, you point out many positive religious experiences you had as a Muslim. For instance, you describe Mecca’s Grand Mosque as a place of vastness and beauty. You praise the kindness that you experienced there, a sense of community, a lack of prejudice. Are there times when you miss that aspect of being a practicing believer?

Hirsi Ali: I’d love to go and visit the Mosque in Mecca again, just for the sheer beauty of it, not for God—much the way a non-Catholic might go to Vatican City because of the beauty of the buildings and the artifacts. There’s a sense of calm in such places that’s wonderful, and there’s the awe you feel because of what humanity can accomplish.

Lack of prejudice?


As if all of that is not bad enough, she adds the following:

CONAN: Thank you, Miriam. Here’s an email from Brenda in Berkeley: Don’t you think that persons from traditional Muslim societies are not a good cultural fit for the West, particularly America, and should not be admitted as immigrants? Not all diversity is desirable. And she gives us examples of FGM, which by – I assume she means female genital mutilation, and polygamy.

Ms. ALI: You know, I don’t – I really don’t think that we – by excluding people or by kicking people out of the country, that that is where we should look for solutions. The United States is a highly moral country. Most Americans go out of their way to help people who are underprivileged, whether it’s in the United States or outside of the U.S.

Hirsi went on to say that those who call for Sharia should be turned away. What if they lie? What about the hordes of Muslim invaders who are destroying Europe from within?

Now I take you to her latest article that was published by the Wall Street Journal, among other online news sites. An article that follows the same suicidal pattern of the West ever since 911. Pinning our hopes on “good Islam” saving us from “bad Islam”. An article that is a promotion of her new book, “Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now.”

Why Islam Needs a Reformation

To defeat the extremists for good, Muslims must reject those aspects of their tradition that prompt some believers to resort to oppression and holy war

“Islam’s borders are bloody,” wrote the late political scientist Samuel Huntington in 1996, “and so are its innards.” Nearly 20 years later, Huntington looks more right than ever before. According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, at least 70% of all the fatalities in armed conflicts around the world last year were in wars involving Muslims. In 2013, there were nearly 12,000 terrorist attacks world-wide. The lion’s share were in Muslim-majority countries, and many of the others were carried out by Muslims. By far the most numerous victims of Muslim violence—including executions and lynchings not captured in these statistics—are Muslims themselves.

Not all of this violence is explicitly motivated by religion, but a great deal of it is. I believe that it is foolish to insist, as Western leaders habitually do, that the violent acts committed in the name of Islam can somehow be divorced from the religion itself. For more than a decade, my message has been simple: Islam is not a religion of peace.

Unfortunately Hirsi is being hypocritical here. Because by implying Islam can reform is exactly what she is condemning.


As it turns out, the West has some experience with this sort of reformist project. It is precisely what took place in Judaism and Christianity over the centuries, as both traditions gradually consigned the violent passages of their own sacred texts to the past. Many parts of the Bible and the Talmud reflect patriarchal norms, and both also contain many stories of harsh human and divine retribution. As President Barack Obama said in remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast last month, “Remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ.”

Christianity was able to reform because its central figure, Jesus, was a man of peace. The polar opposite of Mohammad.

For instance, Mohammad ordered people to be brutally stoned to death.

untitled (6)
Bukhari Volume 8, Book 82, Number 813:

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:

When Ma’iz bin Malik came to the Prophet (in order to confess), the Prophet said to him, “Probably you have only kissed (the lady), or winked, or looked at her?” He said, “No, O Allah’s Apostle!” The Prophet said, using no euphemism, “Did you have sexual intercourse with her?” The narrator added: At that, (i.e. after his confession) the Prophet [Muhammad] ordered that he be stoned (to death).

While Jesus saved a woman from being pelted to death.

untitled (7)

“Jesus Forgives an Adulterous Woman”

John 8:1-30:

VERSE 7: “And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.”

VERSES 8-9: “And once more he bent down and wrote on the ground. But when they heard it, they went away one by one, beginning with the older ones, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him.”

Jesus spoke out against lying.

John 8:

42: Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me.

43: Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.

44: You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

45: Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!

On the other side, Mohammad instructed Muslims to lie.

imagesCA8G35HY (2)

Sahih Muslim Book 032, Number 6303:

Humaid b. ‘Abd al-Rahman b. ‘Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of ‘Uqba b. Abu Mu’ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him), as saying that she heard Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).

As for the Crusades, apparently she does not know that they were the result of 100’s of years of Muslim aggression.

Truth about Crusades

Coming up next Part II…Hirsi follows the failed policy of trying to categorize Muslims.



Wall of Shame #3 ~ NY’s Muslima Activist Debbie Almontaser

Debbie A in suit jacketToday I take you back to the Wall of Shame segment of Logan’s Warning, in order to introduce member #3. My old “friend”, NY’s Muslima activist and interfaith Queen, Debbie Almontaser.

Over the past few years I have had more than one conversation with Debbie, and the results were basically the same. When questioned on Islam she called for reinforcements and then pulled a Muslim Houdini on me.

This time the conversation started out with me pointing out that Islam preaches hatred against all Jews and Christians.

Koran 9:30:


As you will see, Debbie the so called rights activist does not condemn the verse. Instead she stoops to smear tactics in an attempt to get the focus off of Islam. A tactic frequently used by Muslim propagandists.

Debbie A 1

From there, I brought up some of the other deplorable actions the Muslim war manual calls for. Such as child marriages, lashings, and sex slavery.

Debbie A 2

Debbie A 3

Now wouldn’t any legit right’s activist proudly condemn those actions? Of course they would. But Debbie never did condemn those actions, or even attempt to mislead me by saying Islam did not allow them. Instead she did was she does best when questioned on Islam. Pull a Muslim Houdini.

Since then I recenlty asked her how she can be for equal rights, and still be a Muslim?

Koran 9:29:

{ قَاتِلُواْ ٱلَّذِينَ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَلاَ بِٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلآخِرِ وَلاَ يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ وَلاَ يَدِينُونَ دِينَ ٱلْحَقِّ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ ٱلْكِتَابَ حَتَّىٰ يُعْطُواْ ٱلْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَاغِرُونَ }

Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam — from among of those who (min, ‘from’, explains [the previous] alladhīna, ‘those who’) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (‘an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, ‘compliantly’, or ‘by their own hands’, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam.

Her response?

Blocked by 3 Debbie Almontaser

Debbie Almontaser, another Muslim propagandist exposed by Logan’s Warning.

Debbie A in headscarf

TONIGHT! Logan’s Warning & Radio Jihad’s Vito “Mamma Mia NO Sharia” Esposito!

No ShariaHello friends! In an effort to further help educate the public to the threat of Islam, I will be joining the one-and-only, hard hitting, Vito “Mamma Mia, NO Sharia” Esposito, of Radio Jihad tonight!

Tonights guest will be Mr. Christopher Logan of Logan’s Warning and President at North American Infidels (NAI). Chris has been one of the most ardent educators on the Islamic movement in the United States of America. Mr. Logan does not back down from a challenge nor is he afraid to take Islamic apologists head on and back up his claims with verses from the Quran, Hadith and other revered Islamic text.

You can find Chris at his website – Logan’s Warning or on Facebook and Twitter. He personifies Radio Jihad Network’s goal: “We strive to educate America”! Chris Logan educates America! Sadly to some in the United States of the Offended, he’s not too “Politically Correct”, so you might be offended, in fact you will be offended by the content of this weeks show!

Please join us Monday evening from 6pm to 8pm EST. It will be a candid discussion with Chris on the subject of Islam, it’s impact on our Republic, Moderate vs Radical Muslims, the sanitizing of Islam in the U.S. by the Administration including the POTUS, Freedom of Speech and much more!

Mama Mia NO Sharia!

Other segments will include:

1. The “possibility” of an Islamic reformation as promoted by Team Frank Gaffney, and numerous other prominent names in “this field”.

2.  How interfaith dialogue with Muslims is empowering Islam.

The show which starts at 6PM EST, can be found by clicking HERE, and the call in number is (347) 857-1380. We strongly encourage Muslims to call in and defend their “religion”. See you later!